ipl-logo

The Controversial Issue Of Euthanasia Among Medical Professionals And Ordinary People

584 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Legal and Ethical Issues Involving Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia is a widely discussed issue among medical professionals and ordinary people. The big question is, why is it that doctors who end suffering while also keeping patients alive are applauded, yet those who respect terminally ill patients’ request to end their suffering lives, are often punished?

Freedom of choice regarding the issue of euthanasia is one of the major debates. Patients should have control over their own body and should be able to choose whether they would like to be euthanized or not. However, patients may end up choosing euthanasia not for themselves, but for others. They may feel guilty for putting their friends and family members through this and die from guilt.

Regarding a patient’s own decisions, they may also give up early and choose to be euthanized when staying alive for longer may result in recovering. Though not losing hope allows a better chance of recovery, most of the time, patients will end up dying after suffering for longer than needed to. …show more content…

Other factors can be eliminated with help and a patient can then decide if they want to be euthanized.

While euthanasia debates can depend on patients making the right or wrong decision, there are also many factors depending on other’s decisions. Non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia are the main reasons that people worry about legalizing euthanasia. While voluntary euthanasia can be legalized without non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia not being legalized, there can be cases where patients are left suffering for they cannot give consent themselves, but it is obvious that they should be euthanized.

In fact, the main reason that euthanasia is illegal in most countries is that it can be easily mistaken for murder or an excuse for murder. If euthanasia is legalized, then how is it proved that a certain case is or is not

Show More
Related
992 Words | 4 Pages

Keown speaks about the doctrine of the Quality of life, a doctrine that considers both the value of treatment as well as the value of the patient’s life. Especially, while treatments may improve and help stabilize patients to regular health, the prospect of a normal life usually fades when attached to life support. Thus, the practice of euthanasia should be available to those under life support as while the treatment does keep patients alive, the quality of their mental and physical lives will likely not be the same as before medical assistance. In addition, Euthanasia is a practice that not only considers a patient’s quality of life, but also their sensibility and clarity to make such a decision. Patients who remain conscious reserve the ability to make decisions to their own body regardless of intent.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

The legalization of physician assisted suicide is a very polarizing topic with many advocates for each opposing position. Despite the position that physician assisted suicide should be illegal there are still many valid arguments for its legalization. One of the more popular arguments in favor physician assisted suicide is that it ends the suffering of patients who are experiencing intolerable pain. Most jurisdictions in which, have legalized physician assisted suicide to terminally ill patients, have done so on the belief that it presents a more “merciful death”. As physician assisted suicide does bring a more painless alternative most patients do not request the practice for the purposes of pain.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Some suffer more than others, people experience death differently due to different causes of death. Moreover, in health care, physicians experience difficult situations that require ethical decisions. Patients at the end of life process do not always have the capability to make decisions for themselves. The burden to make medical decisions is left to families and physician’s. Some cases are so intense, because patients voluntarily request assisted suicide.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Religions and morals come into careful consideration, yet society promptly presumes assisted-suicide patients get the “unnatural, easy way out,” while assisting-physicians benefit from performing a “quick and painless” death as they move on to their next patients. A mass number of people sense that since the performance is illegal in some states, the self-destructing act should remain illegal. Also, people against euthanization agree all parties must fight, instead of performing a “simple solution,” especially if the sicks’ probability to live is slowly elevating. On the contrary, “physician-assisted suicide is not a guaranteed quick and painless death, and there are tremendous consequences for those who have complications” (Wise). Even with advanced medicine and technology, physicians, patients, and patients’ family and friends deliberate whether the life-ending action will benefit patients’ overall health.

Read More
1491 Words | 6 Pages

Euthanasia: Ethical Dilemmas and Possible Solutions Euthanasia is defined by The Merriam-Webster dictionary as, “the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering (n.d.). This is a very controversial topic as ethical dilemmas are present when the possible contemplation of euthanasia exists. There are ethical dilemmas involved with a decision that involves allowing someone else to die. Ethical problems usually do not have a simple answer or often lead to an indisputable solution. Different views on the matter may provide potentially different outcomes.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Although, permitting this humane option should have strict limits on those who can access the laws ensuring that an individual is competent and protected against any coercion. Two or more doctor should be required to examine the patient review the medical file and ensure that that individual is fully informed and acting voluntarily. Euthanasia is like a compassionate end-of-life health care options that should be available to critically ill individuals. There are principles, like compassion and respect, that deeply matter to those with serious medical conditions, even those who are not. No one should be forced to suffer a cruel death.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

The possible legalization of euthanasia can cause a great disturbance in how people view life and death and the simplicity of how they would treat it. "There are many fairly severely handicapped people for whom a simple, affectionate life is possible." (Foot, p. 94) As demonstrated, the decision of terminating a person 's life is a very fragile and difficult one, emotionally and mentally. Nevertheless, it’s a choice we can make if it is passive euthanasia being expressed.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

According to what I know about the practice of euthanasia, not everyone who has a disease requires death, physicians will accept it. Physicians always look at the patient's medical history carefully whether the condition is not a cure and what the patient's condition is like before making the decision. They usually need to require an inquiry a discussion of the medical term and the doctor is treating the patient to determine is permitted to do euthanasia or not. After that, they will ask the patient or their family to sign the consent form and then report this case to the municipal pathologist. Obviously, practicing euthanasia for doctors is a hard work, because when we look at it in some aspects, many people will assume that this practice is not ethical regarding acceptance.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

The practice is carried out by one of two methods: standard euthanasia, assisted death carried out by the doctor, and assisted suicide, where the doctor can prescribe the deadly dose, but the patient must take the dose themselves (“Euthanasia Law”). In either case, the patient has full control of the decision which can give the patient the opportunity to change his or her mind at the last moment if they choose to do so. This control should not be withheld simply because some do not see it as ethical, especially if there are patients who would opt for this choice. In a U.K. study published by the Journal of Medical Ethics, it was shown that most terminally ill patients believed that the choice to receive euthanasia was a right, and believed that a change in the law was necessary (Chapple). As patients have an active role in making and planning their plan of care throughout their lives, they should also be free to have an active role in their death as well.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

Euthanasia is a universal subject even if someone is not personally considering assisted suicide. Dr. Fenigsen writes, “We are equal in our ability to suffer, fear, and hope, and equal in our final necessity to face death and die” (Fenigsen, 100). Foremost, this decision affects the patient and their families. This is exhausting, emotionally, physically and financially. Furthermore, Dr. Fenigsen continues, “Many of us strongly feel that every human being's life, beginning with our own, has inestimable value” (Fenigsen,

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

This prolonging of life brings about many ethical dilemmas in the field of medicine. One of the issues is patient autonomy. The practice of euthanasia has been established to put the choice back into the hands of the patient. To better understand euthanasia, there are five different types.

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

Because active euthanasia is a deliberate act that intends to end the life of a human being, it is still considered a form of murder in the eyes of the law of many countries

Read More
1321 Words | 6 Pages

The Right to Die has been taking effect in many states and is rapidly spreading around the world. Patients who have life threatening conditions usually choose to die quickly with the help of their physicians. Many people question this right because of its inhumane authority. Euthanasia or assisted suicide are done by physicians to end the lives of their patients only in Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana, New Mexico and soon California that have the Right to Die so that patients don’t have to live with depression, cancer and immobility would rather die quick in peace.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION Euthanasia alludes to the act of deliberately close a life keeping in mind the end goal to assuage torment and enduring. There are different euthanasia laws in each country. The British House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering".[1] In the Netherlands, euthanasia is understood as "termination of life by a doctor at the request of a patient"". Euthanasia is sorted in diverse ways, which incorporate voluntary, non-voluntary, or automatic.

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

The act of euthanasia, whether active or passive, is heavily obstructed in the medical field. Through medical ethics, the act of passive euthanasia is condoned by withholding treatment and thus, allowing the patient to die. Without any direct contact with the patient, the doctor is not considered as the cause of death. Thus, the medical field views passive euthanasia as of lesser and more permissible value in comparison to active euthanasia. In the statement made by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association, they perceive this as contrary to mercy killing, as it is, the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family.

Read More

More about The Controversial Issue Of Euthanasia Among Medical Professionals And Ordinary People

Related Topics

Open Document