ipl-logo

Argument Against Euthanasia In The Film Sea Inside

537 Words3 Pages

Euthanasia has been one of the subjects that had been intensively debated with different views whether is right or wrong. As on the movie Sea Inside, where Ramon who was quadriplegic decided to kill himself in dignity but the government and church opposed since it is believed death should be avoided. People have the right to choose over their life, Euthanasia should be a way of supporting freedom for those who want to live and those who don’t, that have no capacity of living a fully life of their own.

‘Living’ and being ‘alive’ are two different things. Eudaimonia describes life of flourishing, a life in which a person is constantly striving for self-improvement, to be more virtuous, more wise, more thoughtful and self-aware and better (Aristotle). In the film, Ramon feels life is not worth it and stands up to his choice of killing himself. He quotes “People can not identify …show more content…

Although, permitting this humane option should have strict limits on those who can access the laws ensuring that an individual is competent and protected against any coercion. Two or more doctor should be required to examine the patient review the medical file and ensure that that individual is fully informed and acting voluntarily. Euthanasia is like a compassionate end-of-life health care options that should be available to critically ill individuals. There are principles, like compassion and respect, that deeply matter to those with serious medical conditions, even those who are not. No one should be forced to suffer a cruel death. When all else fails when medical treatments, pain management, comfort care, hospice care are no longer able to relieve extreme suffering should have the option to die peacefully with compassion. Laws are meant to prolong life and save lives not end up killing people. Although, in cases of death

Show More
Related
636 Words | 3 Pages

However, the wording of this ethic has left room for interpretation. Many argue that prolonging the life of terminally-ill patients suffering pain constitutes doing harm and that ending the patient’s life would be the correct course of action. My personal view on euthanasia is that although it is a difficult choice, in principle a terminally ill patient has the choice to end his life in a timely and peaceful manner. However, the legislation required to write it into law must be drafted very carefully in a way that protects terminally ill patients from pressure and involuntary euthanasia, and must properly define the boundary between sick and terminally ill patients.

Read More
892 Words | 4 Pages

In euthanasia cases, the focus is not by any means solely on the patient as other people like the family and friends may be affected by the patient’s decision. Even if the patient’s decision would be in his or her best interest, it may be considered inappropriate due to the negative effect it might have on the family and friends of the patient. Utilitarianism would recommend euthanasia if they support the patient’s decision

Read More
1920 Words | 8 Pages

Advocates, such as myself see the fight for physician assisted suicide as moral, just as well as necessary. From a legal, religious and human rights standpoint the legalization of physician assisted suicide is justified for terminally ill patients. Physician assisted suicide is defined as a process in which a physician is allowed to prescribe and deliver lethal doses of medication to a terminally ill patient with the request to die. Euthanasia is

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Patients also must be mentally competent about what they are doing. " Two doctors must confirm the diagnosis and determine that patients are capable of making their own health decisions" ( 'Death with Dignity ' Laws Offer Compassionate Option). Death with dignity should be legal in every state. It is merciful and should be the choice of no one other than the patient.

Read More
996 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia should not be legal for everyone. People shouldn’t be able to be euthanized just because they are depressed. Reasonable restrictions and compromises can be made to keep both sides of this dilemma content. Compromise doesn’t always work well, but one may be put in place that will work out for both sides. Physician’s assisted suicide should be legal, but only for terminally ill people that are unable to cope with life.

Read More
231 Words | 1 Pages

The right to assisted suicide is a compelling issue that concerns people all over the world. Should patients who are terminally ill have the right to doctor-assisted suicide is the major question that have been discussed many years but still, no one can provide an accurate answer. Some are opposed to it because of moral reasons or religious reasons. They think that life is given by parents and a person 's dying actually involves many people, not only their personal things. Others are agree with it because of their respect for the dying.

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

There are different classifications for euthanasia. There is the voluntary euthanasia, which is the one conducted with the patients consent and the only king of euthanasia there should be, there is the non-voluntary euthanasia which is the one were the consent of the patient is unavailable given different circumstances, the involuntary euthanasia is the one conducted against the patients will, this kind of euthanasia shouldn’t really be name euthanasia as much as murder or homicide, this kind of practices, deciding whether to live or not should always have the consent of the patient or in some cases when id unavailable the person that is in charge of the patient, there are also the passive and active euthanasia, passive euthanasia entails the retaining of necessary treatment or medications for the endurance of life. Euthanasia is the decision that every person has over his own life and should be respect by love ones as hard as it may be. Is time for society to accept and respect each persons decision regarding their own life and what they want to do with it, in order to make the society that we actually live in a better place, with acceptance and respect

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

Since patients themselves are the ones who make the decision and the ones who request euthanasia doctors are only there to assist them through the process. This disproves the claim that legalizing euthanasia would grant doctors too much power over patients. Others who also choose to argue against euthanasia claim that if the practice of euthanasia becomes more common the value of human life would be lowered. However, euthanasia does the contrary. Giving ill patients a safe, painless, and peaceful way out of their life is regarded as important.

Read More
1746 Words | 7 Pages

For many years, people’s opinions on euthanasia have been influenced greatly by law or religion, but these two areas often leave people torn with their decision. This leads people to draw upon what is considered, “ethically right”, to guide their decision making. The morals and beliefs of someone who is strictly religious, is very different when compared to someone who believes firmly in the law, which is why ethics helps us to decide what is best for the majority of people. Euthanasia is the deliberate act of ending a person’s life, in order to relive them from unbearable suffering. There are several forms of euthanasia, including assisted suicide, and voluntary, involuntary and non-voluntary euthanasia.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

“Only a morally bankrupt society would not allow euthanasia.” Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient that suffers from an incurable and painful disease or an irreversible coma. Euthanasia can also be considered as mercy killing and assisted suicide. While it may be true that many patients that are in severe pain may request for euthanasia towards their suffering life, the real point to consider is doctors oath to be heroes not murders, patient’s mindset, religious beliefs, and grasping hope of life. Doctors in the medical field believe that euthanasia should not be law because it goes against everything they believe in.

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

Euthanasia is a hugely controversial subject, as many call it is assisted suicide. The word itself, ‘Euthanasia’, comes from Greek language, ‘eu’ meaning ‘goodly well,’ and ‘thanatos’ meaning ‘death.’ This basically means ‘good death’ or ‘easy death.’ There

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY Summary Euthanasia has constantly been a heated debate amongst commentators, such as the likes of legal academics, medical practitioners and legislators for many years. Hence, the task of this essay is to discuss the different faces minted on both sides of the coin – should physicians and/or loved ones have the right to participate in active euthanasia? In order to do so, the essay will need to explore the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, specifically active euthanasia and subsequently provide a stand on whether or not it should be an accepted practice.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

A controversial practice that invokes a debate over how beneficial its intentions are is the use of euthanasia. The argument switches between whether or not putting terminally ill patients to death with the assistance of a physician is justifiable and right. Legalizing the practice of euthanasia is a significant topic among many people in society, including doctors and nurses in the medical field, as it forces people to decide where to draw the line between relieving pain and simply killing. While some people see euthanasia as a way to helping a patient by eliminating their pain, it is completely rejected by others who see it as a method of killing.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

The act of euthanasia, whether active or passive, is heavily obstructed in the medical field. Through medical ethics, the act of passive euthanasia is condoned by withholding treatment and thus, allowing the patient to die. Without any direct contact with the patient, the doctor is not considered as the cause of death. Thus, the medical field views passive euthanasia as of lesser and more permissible value in comparison to active euthanasia. In the statement made by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association, they perceive this as contrary to mercy killing, as it is, the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family.

Read More

More about Argument Against Euthanasia In The Film Sea Inside

Related Topics

Open Document