Autonomy is the key ethical aspect of euthanasia to proponents. This is simply a person’s freedom to lead their lives and have control over their own bodies as they wish, tying in with property of the body notions in a manner that conveys an ailing body should still be the property of an individual with a right to decide their own fate. The definitive disavowal of admiration for an individual is denying them appreciation for their perspectives. The respect is especially vital when it concerns personal and intimate matters, including when to die. Those who are against euthanasia argue that there are other principles that need to be weighed amongst it. For instance, a patient’s right to die must be balanced against the interests of the society, such as concerns that this may threaten the right to life of other ill patients who do not want to die. They also argue that it is highly improbable to make an informed autonomous choice as most patients are often unaware of the availability of rehabilitative care for people with disabilities and terminal illnesses. Others say autonomy should not be used to justify euthanasia. This is because autonomy gives a person free will to develop the life they want, whereas euthanasia ends a person’s life. The supporters of euthanasia likewise do not agree that anyone who wishes to die should be allowed to. Be that as it may, if they think that his or her decision is …show more content…
In euthanasia cases, the focus is not by any means solely on the patient as other people like the family and friends may be affected by the patient’s decision. Even if the patient’s decision would be in his or her best interest, it may be considered inappropriate due to the negative effect it might have on the family and friends of the patient. Utilitarianism would recommend euthanasia if they support the patient’s decision