ipl-logo

The Debate Over Voluntary Euthanasia

1100 Words5 Pages

Should euthanasia be allowed or not? It has become a very controversial issue nowadays.Velleman and Hooker have different perspectives of euthanasia whether there should be a law permitting voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia. I would strongly agree with Hooker's argument that there should be a law permitting voluntary euthanasia when it's for the good of the own person and they should be able to make their own decisions. Brad Hooker believes that according to Rule-Utilitarianism we ought to have a law permitting voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia. Types of euthanasia, he addresses are, Voluntary euthanasia is when a person is killed or dies for his own good and asked to die; Non-Voluntary euthanasia is when a person is unconscious or …show more content…

He believes that having an option or given an option can be harmful even if we don’t exercise it. “ A person can be harmed by having a choice, even if he chooses what’s best for him” (Velleman 95). Just given that option can force critically ill patients whether they want to live or die. And how theres is also a difference when we think that our life is tiresome versus others thinking so. He also believes that a person might justify why they would still like to live, but while there explaining why they choose to live they might feel pressured by family members to choose to die. For example, let's say someone had a really bad diagnosis and was in really bad pain, but they thought that they should still live because there might be a cure or a treatment, but there family makes them feel unwanted and that there too much too take care off so, then they re think and might want to die so they won't be a burden. Velleman also argues that “autonomy is probably not increased by being given the choice to die”. What he is saying is that the person needs to have full reasoning capacity to make any decisions. “ If a significant number of patients were both competent and morally entitled to chose euthanasia, then we might be obligated to make that option available” (Velleman 97).Velleman is comfortable allowing euthanasia when it’s by default because there might be some people that would like that option of euthanasia and we might be obligated to give it to them and that the best policy of euthanasia is no policy at

Show More
Related
1953 Words | 8 Pages

Gill responds to this objection in many ways. He claims that allowing a person to choose to take their own life is one of the biggest decisions that they can make on their own. He believes that if a terminally

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

Euthanasia Rough Draft Euthanasia has been a big topic of conversation around the United States for the past decade. There are those who are against death by medicine, and those who are for dying with dignity. Right off the back, the words death by medicine and dying with dignity sound a lot different. Those who are pro Euthanasia look at it as ending a persons suffering, and giving them a choice. People against Euthanasia look at it as either suicide or murder, and find it inhumane.

Read More
1347 Words | 6 Pages

’s turn to die. I don’t believe that we should have the power to decide one’s fate. An important part to recognize that is not talked a lot about in this topic is that if euthanasia and assisted suicide is illegal, then doctors won’t have the pressure and burden of having to take someone’s life, even if the person wanted it. These people are educated to be doctors, not killers. They are meant to use everything in their power to save patients, not take away their life.

Read More
267 Words | 2 Pages

Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia has been one of the most debated subjects in the past years. There are resilient advocates on both sides of the debate for and against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Advocates of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide believe it is a person ’s right to die when faced with terminal illness rather than suffer through to an unpleasant demise. Whereas, opponents contend that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is not only equivalent of murder, but it is ethically and morally incorrect.

Read More
2030 Words | 9 Pages

”(Velleman,607).These two principles boil down to the statement “...a person has the right to live and die, in particular, by his own convictions about which life would be better for him.”(Velleman,607). Velleman rejects the first principle and accepts the second principle, the rejection of the first principle is on the basis that it sanctions the suicide of a person for a particular reason whether that reason be to avoid harm or to simply obtain benefit(s).

Read More
406 Words | 2 Pages

World War 1 is one of the most historical wars that ever occurred not only in the United States but the whole world. Even though the U.S. has been involved in many wars throughout the world. This war stands out to a lot of people, including myself. I will talk about what caused the U.S. to enter war, how this war is considered a “great war,” and how World War 1 impacted the U.S.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

Everybody has a right to make a choice. When a person goes to a restaurant, that person has the right to make choice of which entree to eat. However, sometimes a person might not be able to make a decision, such in case of person who is bed bound or a person with a terminal illness. I believe that Physician-assisted suicide should be available as an option for those who can and can’t make decisions for the following reasons cost and ending deterring quality of life.

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

In this case, healthcare professionals actively participate in the patient death. According to ethical principles, healthcare professionals should do good and do no harm for patients. Therefore, assisting in her death violates the principle of nonmaleficence. In addition, active euthanasia defines as an intentional act of ending patients lives, whether or not the dying patients request. Four states, Oregon, Washington, Vermont, and Montana have approved laws of the practice of physician-assisted suicide.

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

This euthanasia law was and has been used for people who for animals in the pound, violent people in jail, There are 2 main types of euthanasia, Active and Passive. Active Euthanasia is when all medical supply that you need to survive an illness is cut off . Passive Euthanasia is given or is injected with a drug that will instantly

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

A very controversial topic lately is that of euthanasia. Physician assisted suicide is a very debatable ethical issue because people have different morals. I argue that in some cases it is ethical and others it is not. I believe that if someone is going to die, that there is absolutely no cure available that if they want to die via physician assisted suicide that is their choice. One of the main reasons that people chose to die via PAS is because they are in pain and don’t want their families to see them miserable.

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

Death by Doctor Tony Nicklinson suffered from locked-in syndrome for seven years, caused by a stroke in 2005. He was unable to speak, to eat, or move, but remained fully conscious. “Imagine if you can, your worst nightmare. Then make it worse-and you’re nowhere near it”

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

This prolonging of life brings about many ethical dilemmas in the field of medicine. One of the issues is patient autonomy. The practice of euthanasia has been established to put the choice back into the hands of the patient. To better understand euthanasia, there are five different types.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

A controversial practice that invokes a debate over how beneficial its intentions are is the use of euthanasia. The argument switches between whether or not putting terminally ill patients to death with the assistance of a physician is justifiable and right. Legalizing the practice of euthanasia is a significant topic among many people in society, including doctors and nurses in the medical field, as it forces people to decide where to draw the line between relieving pain and simply killing. While some people see euthanasia as a way to helping a patient by eliminating their pain, it is completely rejected by others who see it as a method of killing.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

Euthanasia can be interpreted in different ways depending on the person/point of view. Euthanasia is another word for mercy-killing, those who are in great pain and their treatments show no sign of progress can choose euthanasia as an option to die mercifully and with dignity. When a person goes through euthanasia, they consume a euthanasia solution through a vein or by drinking it. Then, they rest as the solution kills them. There have been many controversies on whether euthanasia should be legalized.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION Euthanasia alludes to the act of deliberately close a life keeping in mind the end goal to assuage torment and enduring. There are different euthanasia laws in each country. The British House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering".[1] In the Netherlands, euthanasia is understood as "termination of life by a doctor at the request of a patient"". Euthanasia is sorted in diverse ways, which incorporate voluntary, non-voluntary, or automatic.

Read More

More about The Debate Over Voluntary Euthanasia

Related Topics

Open Document