ipl-logo

The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty

705 Words3 Pages

The Death Penalty is a very controversial topic for many people to talk about it. For many people think the death penalty may be just or unjust, as for many people they have a neutral opinion. They have a different kind of opinion when it comes to this penalty. As you keep on reading, this essay will show, all the cruel aspect of this punishment. At the same time this punishment, is also deserved in a way. There are many pros and cons to this act. The Death Penalty is right in some ways for people because some people are just too dangerous to be kept alive, or depending on what they did, or also it could be bad because a lot of people are falsely accused. Also, many criminals want it as way out of this world.
Some reasoning does have explanation …show more content…

With this death penalty, thousands of people have been falsely accused and have been killed. No justice system can give results which are 100% right all the time. Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testiment for proof. We should be observant to find and avoid such mistakes. Our justice system rightfully demands a stricter standard for death penalty situations. It is immoral in principle, and unfair and includes discrimination in practice. No one deserves to die. When the government looks for retaliation disguised as justice, it becomes complicit with killers in hurting human life and human pride. In a civil society, we neglect the principle of the painful doing to criminals, and we do what they did to their victims. We shouldn't punish the murderer with death. "There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment.”. Many think criminals should do their time so they are punished for what they have done. A lot don’t think they should be able to have the chance to leave this world so …show more content…

With what this essay has told you, hopefully it has explained thoroughly for the reader to enjoy it and be informed about this issue. Although they might not be the most detailed or explanatory. Either way for many, they don’t want criminals to be able to get away with illegal acts unpunished. Death isn’t the worst thing that can happen to a person. Many definitely think that imprisonment is a harsher punishment than death itself. Some criminals want the easy way out. My moral issues also influence my opinion on this penalty.
From what you have gathered and read from this paper are a lot of opinions from many people. Hopefully from what you have read, this has influenced you in a good way. Obviously their are pros and cons to this act. People feel like this topic will always be open to controversy. There will always be false accusations and people who will be tried for the wrong crimes. All in all, many don’t think the death penalty should be completely erased, but we could use it in extreme cases. Also, only if we are 100% correct that this is the right person. For many, they won’t have a definite opinion on this topic, but hopefully this helped you define

Show More
Related
677 Words | 3 Pages

While there are far more subjects to discuss regarding to this issue, I feel it necessary to state that I believe the death penalty should exist in a perfect society. I believe that certain crimes and certain situations warrant the punishment of death. However, the our society is not perfect. The justice system has failed to fairly use this punishment in far too many instances, and concludes that they cannot justly wield this

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

It seems hypocritical to kill someone for murdering someone else. Some people believe this penalty is helping our government and

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriage of justice, death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family, it deters crime, and you know the criminal will never hurt anyone again. Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice, Death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family. Family and friends of the victims should never have to worry about parole or a slight chance of that same criminal escaping. Knowing that that one person

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Currently, the death sentence is only applied to those who commit murder, however, in the past, it has also been used for rape and armed robbery. Arguing in favor it can seem justifiable to take the life of a person who unjustifiably took the life of someone else. And with murder being the only way to be sentenced to the death penalty it seems fitting. Along with that, it provides deterrence from committing murder for possibly many people. The deterrence that execution provides is a debated topic nested into another controversial topic.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

This article discusses individual cases and crimes and gives analysis of the arguments made against death penalty in real world. Firstly it discusses the deterrence argument while going through a number of cases. The conclusion is that it has no effect on reducing homicides but ironically it breeds violence as in some cases offenders committed a capital crime in a territory where execution still prevails while they could have easily avoided it. Second thing discussed is the cost, the research in article shows that it costs significantly more money to put a convict to death than to incarcerate him for life in a prison. Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that death penalty is considered to be a cruel and unusual punishment. In my opinion, a life is priceless and shouldn 't be taken away without their willingness. All men are created equal- no man was made better than the other and therefore should not bring death on their life. On the other hand, I think that there are more reasons why people would support the death penalty.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

Most people believe that it is fair punishment to be executed because there is no appeal from death and it is appropriate punishment that should equal the crime. Families of the victims feel like the component of execution is closure for them knowing they took their families life away. This system will teach people to treat others how they would want to be treated and will also help people learn from their lessons from the punishment

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

As a matter of fact, death penalty is socially wrong. The government thinks that it is giving revenge and reduces the value of human life. So forth, the justice system flawed is people could be wrong for who they convinced. Also the death penalty is in different states. However, people can take another person’s life then the person does not deserve to live.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The answer to this question is no, it is moral wrong, and does not follow the guidelines of the principle of utility. In all legal aspects of this process of the death penalty, it violates the principle consistently. From the realm of the cost aspect, the unfair representation of the prisoner, and the cruel and unusual execution methods, each creates clear and cohesive evidence that the death penalty cannot be ethically justified. If something does not inducing happiness and inflict pain to you, would you want it. No, this is the reasoning why we must cease using the death penalty, because it is not ethically

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Death penalty is like the ‘’tooth for a tooth – eye for an eye’’ theory. Instead of acting inhuman to our fellow beings we should find a better way to solve the mind of criminals. Making the problem vanish is not a good idea. We should do psychological researching instead! I, myself have a lot of faith in humanity.

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

Read More

More about The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document