ipl-logo

The Destruction Of Democracy In The Late Roman Republic

868 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Democracy in ancient rome

Lord Acton once said, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”. This politician of the 19th century would have fit well with the late Roman republic. The political leaders of the Roman republic were so greedy for control of it that they ended up destroying the famous democracy. The extent of their violence included placing severed heads onto spears and posting them in the forum.This conflict was the ricochet of the refuse to compromise. Conflict is the manipulating of others to get gain, or the refusal to be manipulated, although in many cases, a refuse to compromise. Compromise is an agreement on a matter, often temporary in Rome. The lack of political compromise between Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelius Sulla, influential leaders of the Roman …show more content…

It gave the aristocrats more power than they should. Because the government is ruled by optimates, Marius’s rise to power causes political conflict with many with many powerful politicians. Anyone could run for offices, but is was so expensive that usually only the optimates could afford. This prevents almost all of the populars from running for offices. Plebeians were also disallowed from marrying into aristocratic rank. Although the plebeians were allowed to be in the assembly of centuries, the wealthy had more power in it. This was the body that the plebeians wanted to be governing. The plebeians also wanted a single ruler who followed the majority(Mcgill). New leaders find that they can use the plebeians’ wants for support, and in turn, for …show more content…

Marius first served as a soldier under Scipio Africanus, a military leader. He was a soldier and he presented his bravery many times. Once when asked, Scipio suggested that they would find a leader in Marius after he was not to lead them anymore(Macgregor). This brought Marius great confidence. He became a quaestor in 123 B.C.(Heaton). Quaestors were subordinates of consuls that administered finance to the public(Mcgill). Marius became the tribune of plebes in 119 B.C. The tribune of plebes was a chief officer in the Assembly of Tribes who could veto any public act at any time(Mcgill). Marius attempts to pass a law that would forbid powerful candidates from intimidating the voters(Heaton). This would not only give him more of a chance, but it was a popular choice with the plebeians, giving him more support. It also started political conflict with powerful political figures. Marius became a praetor in 115 B.C.(Heaton). Praetors were subordinates of consuls that oversaw justice(Mcgill). He was assigned proprietorship in further Spain. He put down many long standing revolts(Heaton). Marius put back running for consul because there was too much political conflict with most powerful politicians. Marius ran for consul in 107 B.C. with new momentum from the Jugurthine war. He was elected because of his military experience(Heaton). Marius was a poor public speaker but a revolutionary military leader,

Show More
Related
690 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.

Read More
1226 Words | 5 Pages

Tiberius Gracchus was a tribune who lived in Rome in the early-mid 1st century BC. Frank Herbert, an American author commented that “The stakes in conflict do not change. Battle determines who will control the wealth or its equivalent”. The actions of Tiberius Gracchus do support the statement by Herbert as the direct challenge to the authority of the Senate he made provoked the Senate to act in an extreme way to maintain power. Tiberius Gracchus was motivated by the people and his position to introduce the reforms and by doing this he threatens the peace in the Roman society.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Polybius goes on to say, “no one can say for sure whether the constitution is an aristocracy or democracy or despotism” in Document A. He then explains how the Roman Republic was each of them, an aristocracy, a democracy, and a despotism, for various reasons. One of these reasons was that, at times, the consuls, or the magistrates, and the Senate had more power than the Assemblies, but in different situations, it was the opposite. This shows that even Polybius, a man who was actually alive during the Roman Republic, didn’t know how to label

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

By this time, it took more effort to vote since people were coming from all over to vote. Rome started to add limits, “How easily a small number of urban residents registered in a rural tribe could determine the vote of that tribe is clear from the small percentage of citizens who actually voted.” (Document C) This shows how little the number of people voted that were actually Roman citizens. The Roman Republic started to become an aristocracy whenever a lot more of the wealthy people came into power.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The citizens would elect Praetors, these were judges that ruled in the judicial branch and would be voted for each year(AR). Usually only the wealthy Praetors would be elected leaving out the middle and lower class citizens of Rome(AR).Today in The U.S., people can vote on issues that are addressed within America and are also able to vote on who is elected as the president no matter what financial state they are in. In Rome, the lower class citizens also known as the plebeians, were forced into the army and were furious at the fact that

Read More
1369 Words | 6 Pages

Once Sylla died, he Caesar returned to Rome and set out to start to make a name for himself amongst social circles. He went and studied rhetoric to become one of the greatest lawyers. As a lawyer he had many successes dealing with high profile former governors who were known to be corrupt and take

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

Faced with these two choices, Caesar chose the consulship over the triumph. In 59BC, Caesar won as consul, which was one of the chief magistrates of the Roman Republic. Caesar was already in Crassus' political debt, but he also made overtures to the General Pompey. Pompey and Crassus had been at odds for decades, leading to Caesar trying to reconcile them. This was a way of dominating Roman politics through alliance, enough wealth and political influence to control public business.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

Pompey was viewed as a fantastic and fair leader and repaid the people with the goodwill that they had shown him. Senators, equestrians and tribuni aerarii were made equal and 64 new Senators were enrolled, all in Pompey’s debt. All these laws replaced those that had been established by Sulla and virtually restored the earlier Republican system. Interestingly,

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Along with this, the excerpt shows how these conceited men saw the less wealthy people with a prejudiced view, assuming that not being rich was equivalent to being unwise. Another instance in which the patrician’s supremacy is clearly displayed is in a letter to the Senate talking about changing rules of citizenship, saying “fear not the changes being proposed to increase citizenship as it will have no bearing on your power or status… I assure you this will not negatively impact any of us and will keep our role as primary lawmakers intact,” (Flavius 1). This demonstrates the patrician concern of their authority over the plebians, as the letter is obviously trying to reassure the readers the patrician position in government is secure. Along with this, it is shown in the excerpt in the simplest of terms that only the patricians are in charge of the government.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

Gaius Marius is best known for his great ability to wage war and control the powerful army of Rome. He began his reign of power as a soldier and in 119 BCE he was elected Tribune of the People. He continued to gain more and more power until 115 BCE when he became praetor, one of the two most important people in the government behind the consul. Around this time he also married a woman from the wealthy Julian family, making him a relative of Julius Caesar. In the following years he served in the military in the wars against Jugurtha in Africa.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
1608 Words | 7 Pages

Lucius Cornelius Sulla was a prominent figure in the late republic of Ancient Rome, rising to power through establishing allies and his military accomplishments. As a member of the patrician class Sulla rose to power through the Roman political ladder (Cursus Honourum). Sulla was the victor of the social war, conducted war against the Mithridates and headed the first civil war in Roman history against Marius. Through his military accomplishments, he gained support from the senate and was later elected consul and then transitioned into dictatorship. He became a well-known dictator in 82 BC where he established a series of governmental reforms altering Rome’s political system.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

The magistrates and tribunes… were the only ones who could place legislation before the voters.” The small percent of citizens that actually did vote in Ancient Rome were spoon-fed their candidates by higher ups like the magistrates in

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More

More about The Destruction Of Democracy In The Late Roman Republic

Related Topics

Open Document