How successful was the League in the 1920? Discuss
The League Of Nations had some problems and defects by the 1920 's. But that doesn 't mean the League wasn 't successful. She also did things that improved the situation of the people and some countries at that time.
On the one hand, The League had a lot of failures by the 1920 's. to start with, I will explain two conflicts between some countries that the League of Nation couldn 't solve.
One of them is a problem between Poland and Lithuania.
Poland took Lithuania capital called Vilna, so Lithuania presented the problem to the League, as it must be, but the League did not solve the conflict as she should do. In the end, Poland kept with Vilna.
Now, I am going to develop another conflict that the League couldn 't solve. This problem was between Italy and Greece and it started when Tellini, an Italian general had to supervise the sorting out the borders between Greece and Albania. This General was killed in the middle of the borders so the murderer could be Italian or Greek. The Italian leader, called Mussolini got very angry and blamed the Greek government for the murder. He demanded them to pay a compensation and to execute the murderers. In the meantime, he bombed and invaded Corfu.
The greeks didn 't have any idea of who the murder was, so they asked the League for help. The League of Nations proposed to condemned Mussolini’s actions, but also made Greeks pay compensation and the money to be held by the League
After the formation of the Hellenic League which successfully repelled Persia from Greece, the alliance broke up into two major forces. Thucydides claims “at the head of the one stood Athens, at the head of the other Lacedaemon, one the first naval, the other the first military power in Hellas.” (1.18) Athens and allies became the Delian League, which continued fighting in Asia Minor in order to conquer and liberate Persian controlled Greek states, and Sparta and allies formed the Peloponnesian League. However, once peace had been established with Persia in 449, the Delian League was reformed and Athens held hegemony over the allies and utilized them as tribute paying subjects.
So in an attempt to avoid future conflict of the same scale, the Allies allowed the Central Powers no participation in the treaty’s negotiations, stripped Germany of many of its territories, blamed it for the war, and imposed substantial reparation payments. However, although the Allies were hopeful that these measures would ensure peace in the future, the Versailles Treaty has been cited as a
Precisely, as stated by Irreconcilable William Borah in a speech to the Senate in 1918, the League of Nations in particular stands no chance at imposition, and certainly does not stand on its own, for it clearly, contradictorily advocates for the very measures that it seemingly goes against: “The first proposition connected with the proposed league is that of a tribunal to settle the matters of controversy which may arise between the different nations. Will anyone advocate that those matters which are of vital importance to our people shall be submitted to a tribunal created other than by our own people and give it an international army subject to its direction and control to enforce its decrees? I doubt if anyone will advocate that … if you do not do so, Mr. President, what will your league amount to? … In its last analysis the proposition is force to destroy force, conflict to prevent conflict, militarism to destroy militarism, war to prevent war. In its last analysis it must be that if it has any sanction behind its judgment at all.
Because of that point, American senators were iffy about ratifying the treaty. They saw the League of Nations as a trap. Basically America would be pulled into all kinds of wars even if they were not the ones directly attacked. If America had decided to ratify it, all of the Americans would be at risk because who is to say a nation not in the
World War I, at its time, was the most violent and destructive war in human history. Afterwards, the Allies convened at the Paris Peace Conference to ensure that such total and utter demolition and loss of human life would never happen again. At this conference, they created the Treaty of Versailles, a peace treaty which dictated the terms of Germany’s surrender. America’s greatest concern with this treaty was Article X, a clause which stated the terms of the League of Nations. This was incredibly controversial, as it dictated that the nations who ratified the treaty would be required to involve themselves in conflicts which may not necessarily pertain to them.
Though they had differing views, they managed to agree on some key terms and produce what is known as the Treaty of Versailles. This treaty was meant to end
Explain the reasons for U.S. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. How did ideas about neutrality change during the period from the end of World War I to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act? Be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response.
One of the main reasons that the U.S. was practicing neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s was because they no longer wished to be involved in Foreign wars, such as WW1. They were hoping to "return to normalcy" under the taking of office from Harding.
He believed that only a strong leader like himself could defeat conflicts caused by other political parties (especially communists/socialists) and post-war problems (World War I). Mussolini’s first call to action was creating a group called the “Blackshirts” that would carry out beatings against communist leaders and throwing them out of office. People of all different backgrounds joined including teachers, business people, and store owners (Document 5). Mussolini constantly told his people that he was going to restore Italy back to its glorious Roman Empire era. He backed up his sayings by invading Ethiopia.
In 1920, the United States was celebrating the “Roaring Twenties”. It was a time of great prosperity, but not for all of Europe. We were celebrating relief from World War I and the money we received from it. We were getting back to normalcy. We were almost solely an isolated country, but our foreign policy was going to change within the next ten years.
The reasons the U.S called neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s is because they no longer wanted to be involved with wars, for example World War 1, and they had enough going on the inner parts of the U.S, such as women gaining the right to vote. As things went on the United States realized that tings weren’t staying as neutral as they planned, for instance African Americans were gaining in dependence. Ideas about neutrality changed change during the period from the end of World War I to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act in ways like, for instance when we sent help to China or Britain, so ideas were becoming less neutral and more team related in a way.
In my opinion, the point at which U.S actions were no longer neutral is when the United
World War I transformed the country from it’s old traditional ways to a new influential era known as the 1920’s or the “Roaring 20’s”. It changed the way society viewed women, African Americans, and immigrants. The 1920’s also placed a distinctive line between Americans, especially Americans for and against prohibition.
By the 1920’s “Flappers” became the new face of women all over the nation.
Many portray the 1920s as a time of lighthearted leisure and prosperity. When in fact this period consisted of significant economic , social and cultural conflicts. Technological innovations sparked the economy and life post war was significantly different with the introduction to what we know as the “New women” the new women also sparked many social conflicts. Along with the New women tension between religion and science also sparked many important conflicts during the time we know as the Jazz Age.
America experienced a sudden disregard of Victorian values following World War I, causing the generation of the 1920s to dramatically contrast the previous. This severe degree of change produced three major manifestations of the contradictions in the twenties. There were massive conflicts to the Jazz Age, technological advancements, and Black Migration. The contradictions of the 1920s reflect America’s conflicted state between advancement and convention, as the cultural and technological developments of the era coincide with the inability of individuals to stray from traditional norms and racist attitudes.
Famous abolitionist and activist Sojourner Truth said, “You have been having our rights so long, that you think, like a slave-holder, that you own us. I know that it is hard for one who has held the reins for so long to give up; it cuts like a knife. It will feel all the better when it closes up again.” This quote is a part of the many speeches that she delivered for the abolitionist movement and slave rights. But what exactly is the abolitionist movement, and what did they do?
The two nations could not come to a decision as to who should control the islands, and both of them were threatening to fight for them. In 1921, they appealed to the League. The League decided that the Åland Islands should remain under Finnish control, but it should be a demilitarized zone. Sweden accepted the League’s decision and consequently, peace was maintained and war was prevented.
Another example
