RESEARCH PAPER The President William Clinton and Monica Lewinsky Scandal Revisited Monica Torain HIST- 410 Professor Bruce Franklin Devry University On January 7, 1999 the United States Senate began the second presidential impeachment trial in the history of the United States, since the trial of President Andrew Johnson in 1868 (History- President Clinton impeached, 2014). According to The Clinton Impeachment, a Basic Chronology, in June 1995, President William Clinton sparked a steamy affair with 21-year-old White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, which lasted a little over a year, with plentiful erotic meetings.
Based on his campaign visits, it is no surprise that Bill Clinton won the Election of 1996. Despite the events of Whitewater, Bill Clinton succeeded in his re-election campaign for the Presidency of the United States. In terms of campaigning, it appears that Bill Clinton was born to campaign. Overall, audience members of his campaigns visits responded positively right after the visit of the President on his re-election campaign. In one event early on in the campaign in 1995, Clinton visited the University of Texas at Austin were observers described Clinton as “to be in his element occupying the limelight and looking presidential”.
The Survivor Bill Clinton in the White House Book Summary The book, The Survivor Bill Clinton in the White House, starts by telling how Bill Clinton ran for president in 1992 against the incumbent, President George H. W. Bush and won. When Bill Clinton was inaugurated, he started working on the budget and one of his campaign promises, which was to cut the federal deficit down to half of what it was by the end of his first term in 1997 (Harris 23). In order to reduce the deficit, Clinton took the advice of Vice President Gore, which was to increase taxes (Harris 25). When the economic plan was finished and ready to be shown to the nation, it had for every one new dollar spent, a two dollar reduction of the deficit (Harris 29). Also early in
Bill Clinton was also an American politician who had served as the 42nd President of the United States. He had served his time from 1993 to 2001 and throughout his time in office, he had both aided yet negatively impacted the United States, which can be seen through many acts and bills he had signed, both domestic and foreign. Domestic accomplishments of President Clinton firstly included cutting the tax, similar to what Reagan had done. Clinton had signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, cutting taxes for millions of low-income families. He had also cut tax for almost 100% of small businesses and raised the tax on the wealthiest taxpayers.
Option 1 Bill Clinton was 46 years old when he went into office, making him the youngest President since John F. Kennedy. He was also the second U.S. President to be impeached; however, not just bad things happened during his time in office. Clinton was President from 1993 to 2001, and he accomplished many things for the United States during that time. For example, he was able to create more jobs and drop the unemployment rate significantly. He also played close attention to issues in the education system.
Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the
The Prince and the Discourses, by Machiavelli as a gift to the prince. Because it was the best thing that Niccolo Machiavelli could give to him. He was trying to teach the prince ways to stay in power. Machiavelli even stated it himself “I can consider of this subject, discussing what a principality is, the variety of such states, how they are won, how they are held, and how they are lost” (Machiavelli xxiv). The main focus of his work was with monarchies because he did not care for republics.
“Machiavelli was forced to withdraw from politics, but he continued to evaluate the meaning of his fifteen years of political experiences and their relationship to the solution of contemporary problems and to the universal flow of history,” (Ruffo-Fiore). Niccolò Machiavelli wrote The Prince in response to his political career coming to an end. In this he inserted many ideas about man, politics, leadership, thought, and much more, each and every concept still be grasped by the modern day man. Furthermore, he inserted his largely ideas about what a good political leader is. This is important, as this was not the only work of this time that discusses political leadership.
One aspect of Machiavelli’s theory which significantly contributes to his reputation as the “philosopher of evil,” is his advice to the prince on keeping their word to the public. In chapter eighteen, Machiavelli states, “a wise ruler cannot, and should not, keep his word when doing so is to his disadvantage, and when the reasons that led him to promise to do so no longer apply” (pg. 37). To simplify, Machiavelli says princes are obligated to lie in certain circumstances. He also states that while it is unnecessary for the prince to have positive qualities, such as honesty, trustworthiness, sympathy, compassion, or be religious, it is essential for the prince to be viewed so by the public (pg. 37). While many people argue that Machiavelli’s legitimization of lying and deception in politics is immoral, I argue the opposite.
And even more so, its a warning to the people of Italy about the power of governments. If read straightforward The Prince is manual for ambitious men on how to become a tyrant, however, if one takes the context in which it was written, The Prince reads very different. Machiavelli was a long time diplomat, having spent time in various courts, and thus had much experience and understanding of politics. He writes, “I depart from the orders of others … it has appeared to me more convenient to go after the effective truth of the thing rather then
Bill Clinton is known as one of the most powerful speakers in the United States, and he impresses his audience by his speeches and the rhetorical devices that he includes in his speeches and addresses. For example, he effectively delivers his inaugural address with a convincing tone and some of the rhetorical devices such as allusions and strong diction. In his 1993 inaugural address, Clinton discussed the issues that America faced in the 20th century such as health care costs and low wages. He mentioned that these issues are not solved because America has not “made changes” and made progress to solve the conflicts and restore the economy. Because of this, Clinton knew it was important to ensure that all of the nation was behind him, and if
Niccolò Machiavelli is definitely a very interesting, and undoubtedly controversial figure in not just philosophy and history over all, but also in reference to political and governmental aspects of society today. The question as to whether The Prince serves an accurate depiction of how politics occurs in modern states appears to me, in a sense, to be a loaded/complex question. I say this based on the notion that from a surface perspective, many of his suggested techniques for government if blatantly applied today would still be viewed as downright tyrannical, villainous, hateful, cruel, diabolical, and treacherous as they have been for over 500 years. However, upon closer inspection and unmasked breakdown of how politics operate in the modern states, his depictions look quite valid, and somewhat accurate, being employed in some form or fashion despite popular belief.
According to Machiavelli, ideal prince is a risk-taker who puts a military on action, as the people respect the warrior. An ideal prince thinks for himself rather than relying on others, knows how to read characters, and does not surround himself with flatterers. He lives in reality, not fantasy. He works hard, utilizes his own mind, and makes survival of his guide. The ideal leader is neither loved nor hated, but respected.
Probably one of the most infamous and controversial ideologies of the 16th century, the prince by Machiavelli has been a reference for many great leaders and academicians since it was published. The book provides historically tested and proven principles of leadership. The prince has been described as a manual for those who want to win and retain power. While some may argue that leadership is an inherent trait in human, leaders are made, not born. Making a great leader out of a person is not just a matter of identifying the leadership traits, skill and talents of the individual, but harnessing the traits, develop them and eventually mastering how to be leader.
I. Machiavelli In his famous work the Prince Niccolo Machiavelli exposes what it takes to be a good prince and how only this good price and keep control over his state. There are many different qualities that make a man a good ruler but there are some that are more essential than others. In this work Machiavelli stresses the importance of being a warrior prince, a wise prince, and knowing how to navigate the duality of virtù and vices. Without these attributes there was no way that a prince could hold together their state and their people.
