ipl-logo

The Failure Of Wikipedia's Credibility

1091 Words5 Pages

Wikipedia, as a resource, is undoubtedly useful. It contains many tertiary sources that are useful to users that are searching for general knowledge. One of Wikipedia's core goals is to gather information from users worldwide in order to create a platform for a collaborative creation of knowledge . This goal is theoretically achieved when all articles are of high and accurate quality. However useful Wikipedia is as an informational source, its existence as a platform of collaborative knowledge is hindered by Wikipedia's very own policies and regulations. It relies on users to contribute to, maintain, regulate, and police the content of the entire site. Furthermore, Wikipedia grants freedom to any user who visits to edit, add to, or remove the content of its …show more content…

As well, Wikipedia responds to vandalism on its articles by relying on its users to police the site, giving no other incentive to do so . Users are also responsible to verify the sources that other users reference. Lastly, Wikipedia's policies on editing articles result in users favouring quantity over quality, as the interface of Wikipedia's editing history pages gives an illusion that adding more information is positive, while removing information is detrimental. As a culmination of all these reasons, Wikipedia is failing at the goal of becoming a platform of collaborative knowledge because its very own processes hinder this goal. Wikipedia's primary fault is that it relies on users and bots to edit and maintain its articles. Fundamentally, the sheer size of Wikipedia makes it hard for all articles to be maintained. Wikipedia has approximately 4,000,000 articles, so hiring enough staff to scour through such a mountain of information to edit them is a physical impossibility.

Show More
Related

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

167 Words | 1 Pages

Nicholas Carr "Is Google Making Us Stupid," describes the results of using Google makes people less critical thinks. At first he finds the internet as a wonderful place for writers and such for the ability to search for certain material quickly. Yet after some time he finds that he is unable to read long articles without simply skimming them. He discusses this with his friends his predicament, and finds his friends and such have the same predicament.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

651 Words | 3 Pages

In Nicholas Carr’s article called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr talks about the many issues he believes are stemming from using online search engines and Google in general. This article was written back in 2016 and published into The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings. Carr discusses his view on the whole idea of online readings and most of the information available to the world being viewed online through a search engine like Google. He also goes into thorough detail explaining how he believes that technology is becoming more advanced and smarter than its creators. In Carr’s article, he will explain all that he believes is wrong with technology in today’s society and how dumbed down it has made us.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

804 Words | 4 Pages

Analytical Review of “Is Google Making Us Stupid” As society advances into the technological era, innovations have served society as a catalyst to become more efficient, more technologically sound, and most importantly more in tuned with the rapid changes that are presented to us every day. Yet, there are some, that like to stay “old school.” There are some arguments that state these technological advancements are receding society’s intellectual advancement. Nonetheless, it should be apparent that the subject on society’s advancement has many view points and approaches. In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr approaches the common issues of common availability of information through the internet; most importantly how it effects our ability to search and retain information.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

1562 Words | 7 Pages

With just a few keystrokes and a press of the enter key, Google connects users to the information they’re looking for. Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” explores the phenomenon that people will skim through articles and leave from one site to another. In addition, adds in anecdotes of some of history's greatest inventions and how they similarly relate to the Web. Although the Internet has transformed the way we receive and send information, I feel as if the responsibilities of reading are simply left to us to find out because we take the information for granted. “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, is a 2008 article that delves into the strange finding that people seem to skip through articles without actually understanding the

Read More

How Facts Backfire

1091 Words | 5 Pages

Humanity is in a perpetual state of trying to make living in the world an easier place. In just a few seconds, people can access information at their disposal, instead of having to look through different books to find what you need. But the question arises; does this boundless place for information honestly make us more informed than before we had the internet? Joe Keohane, the author of the article “How Facts Backfire,” is a political journalist who has also written articles on technology and culture.  

Read More

Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

243 Words | 1 Pages

In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid? ” , Nicholas Carr talks about how the internet has affected the way most people process the information that they could found online. The title of the article is the most obvious clue for the argument that he is trying to make. He also points out how internet is our primary source to find the information that we are looking for, but the side effect is affecting our basic ability to read long pieces of information such as books. Google is a well-known website that allows to anyone instant access to kind of information, which can be really helpful if the user knows how to use and manipulate it.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

1464 Words | 6 Pages

From his analysis, it appears that, Carr, in order to convince public opinion or its readers, uses ethos to make credible its sources on the fact that everything that says about the Web is true. Using his personal experience, he will soon realize that he was not the only one to feel these negative effects of Google when he said: “I’m not the only one” (Carr). He cites an example of bloggers like him defending the same causes like Scott Karp who said: “I was a lit major in college, and used to be [a] voracious book reader.” Karp wrote:” What happened?” (Karp), and speculates on the answer: “What if I do all my reading on the web not so much because the way I read has changed, i.e. I’m just seeking convenience, but because the way I THINK has changed?”(Karp), and Bruce Friedman who said, “I now have almost totally lost the ability to read and absorb a longish article on the web or in print.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

1454 Words | 6 Pages

This question is something that is prominent throughout Nicholas Carr’s essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, which he discusses in detail the accounts he, as well as other scholars have encountered. Carr argues that the method of skimming through articles for important information is leading us to do the same with books, or other longer texts. Although there may be a level of disconnect due to the method used on online articles, Clive Thompson, author of “Smarter Than You Think”, words it well with “We tolerate their cognitive hassles and distractions for the enormous upside of being connected, in new ways, to other people” (Thompson 356-357). The “their” he is referring to in that quote is our digital environments. This simply means that you must deal with the hardships that come with the Internet to enjoy what it has to offer.

Read More

Summary Of Danah Boyd's 'Wikipedia As A Site Of Knowledge Production'

708 Words | 3 Pages

I agree with everything that Danah Boyd has to say in “Wikipedia as a Site of Knowledge Production.” Her work is relatable, humorous, and casual, while being compelling. The subject is easy to understand because I often use Wikipedia. She makes it relatable by including the inputs of real students. It appears that she has done a lot of research and interviews on this subject, which gives the reader more real-time information to think about.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid

2024 Words | 9 Pages

I have to disagree; the Internet is changing us in many different ways. We have online classes, library databases, and it has enhanced our abilities for creative input and thinking. Google is a really big resource to search whatever we need. The internet brings numerous advantages to its users. It connects networks.

Read More

Analysis Of Wikipedia, A Professor's Best Friend By Dariusz Jemielniak

759 Words | 4 Pages

Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is a tool that people just can’t seem to agree on whether or not to trust as a real source of information. Many state that the site is full of incorrect information because “just anyone can put something on there.” However, others point out that the process to post an article on Wikipedia is actually quite difficult. Two articles address this issue.

Read More

Is Google Making USupid Nicholas Carr Analysis

1713 Words | 7 Pages

With the Internet being available for everyone, we can find the solution easily on the web. We obtain the information that the internet provides us rather than analyzing the topic and think critically on our own. Instead of reading the long article or book, we look for a summary or response on the internet. We aren’t able to read a long article because we can find a short version on the internet. Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” he mentions Bruce Friedman admitted that he lost the ability to read the long passage, he just skims them.

Read More

Does The Internet Make You Smarter Analysis

358 Words | 2 Pages

Clay Shirky, the author of “Does the internet make you smarter?” wrote about how ignorance has poisoned the internet with incorrect information. Not only does technology has its flaws, but so do books and novels dating back to the Protestant Reformation. Even though many people are against the internet Shirky reassures that if used correctly and appropriately, then it can become a very useful tool that can “tap our cognitive surplus”. The increased collaboration of technology is important to society for the reason that the internet is full of valuable knowledge that can be claimed very quickly and easily. Increased collaboration is absolutely a benefit.

Read More

Analysis Of Tom Nichols Ten Ways To Tell If Your Mole

1553 Words | 7 Pages

Experts Are Not a Thing of the Past There is a dominant assumption that the Internet has changed humanity for the better by allowing people to search for a wide array of information in the matter of seconds. However, Tom Nichols, the author of Death of Expertise, which “Let Me Google that for You” is a chapter, believes because people are exposed to so much information on the internet, they think they are on the same level as an expert, therefore eliminating the need and respect for experts in contemporary society. Even though critics like Nichols assume that the internet is ruining expertise culture, experts, such as Scott Galloway, are able to use digital platforms to convey their expertise and accreditation in a way that maintains and spreads

Read More

How Is Google Ruining Our Memory

1025 Words | 5 Pages

We ask Google a lot of simple questions like, “when is Abraham Lincolns birthday?”, and Google provides us with an easy and quick answer, however; when we are looking for a more complex answer, Google isn’t always our best bet. We are better off going to a person who can tell us. When you search a less obvious question on Google, 9/10 times Wikipedia will show up, and you know what Wikipedia means… pages and pages of information. All of these words make it hard to find what you are looking for. This is why some of us tend to use our peers more often, because it is easier, faster, and they are more likely to get right to the point.

Read More

More about The Failure Of Wikipedia's Credibility

Related Topics

Open Document