Wikipedia Essays

The concept behind Wikipedia is that it’s an encyclopedia that presents information from consensus.  This is a phenomenal concept, very typical of the way we think about the world today, that is, inclusive:  YouTube, allows you to perform your own show, even have your own channel; Facebook, allows you to publish “news” about yourself.  Wikipedia joins this social revolution and allows you to join the conversation and create knowledge. However, none of these platforms are considered to be scholarly

work, teachers instruct the students not to use each sources that is available. From personal experiences, Wikipedia was the sources that was not true nor reliable each times used. Wikipedia is a well-known open online encyclopedia that is open for public distribution of information. Dennis Baron, an English professor and the author of “Wikipedia: Write First, Ask Questions Later,” said “Wikipedia is also the online sources whose reliability we most often question or ridicule” (705). Given such a vast

controversy surrounding it, Wikipedia has become one of the largest storehouses of accessible information. Wikipedia boasts over 3.2 million articles in English concerning domains ranging from science, the arts, humanities, pop culture and virtually every other aspect of humanity. It is essentially an online encyclopedia which anyone can edit. This statement does have some caveats, such as protected controversial articles; however the main premise is that Wikipedia is written collaboratively by

1. Introduction One of the biggest free online knowledge bases is Wikipedia which is growing constantly. Wikipedia is a project which was founded in 2001, to create a free online encyclopaedia. Due to the fact that everybody can contribute to Wikipedia, by creating or editing articles, Wikipedia grew fast to the largest and most popular work on the internet [Wika]. Just the English version has more than 5 million di erent articles. Even though everybody can create articles, the quality of the content

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia accessible for anyone. The website is written collaboratively by anonymous sources; an abundant amount of people contributes to Wikipedia, which causes many people are constantly correcting Wikipedia’s information. Due to the nature of Wikipedia’s writing, Wikipedia should not be used for scholarly evidence, because there is an issue of credibility. A fundamental aspect of a scholar is to examine the reliability and credibility of any information source. Thus,

contribute materials.(Online encyclopedia) Among all online encyclopedias, Wikipedia, a free encyclopedia that allows its users to edit almost any article accessible, is usually considering as the represent of the highest level of online encyclopedia. (Wikipedia)The popularity and size of it are extremely amazing. Every month, More than 18 billion page views on average and nearly 500 million unique visitors make Wikipedia list on one of the most visited websites in the world (Anderson, Hitlin and

In discussing the subject on Wikipedia and defamation I believe it is important to highlight how little I knew about this subject before this weeks lesson. In hindsight, I believe it is important to know how sources can be manipulated, especially Wikipedia, which in turn could lead to question in credibility. As someone who relies on Wikipedia for a base in any research I do, in watching the video from Tech News Today, I was dumbfounded to how simple edits can lead to "trans phobic" ideals and misconceptions

According to University of Delaware (2008), Wikipedia is a web page that enable anybody to edit the content. Originally, the intention for creating Wikipedia is to enable any web user to read and at the same time write in the web page for knowledge sharing. Wikipedia also has a huge amount of user and audience. It also stated that Wikipedia has no authorship and using simplified markup language. Wikipedia content is owned by the community meaning that any one that sharing something in the web page

The author of the passage Charms of Wikipedia, Nicholson Baker, talks about how far Wikipedia has come with an interesting concept. In this passage, he points out that Wikipedia is a dangerous place to rely on information where anyone can go in and edit, and essential put whatever they want, but that is what has made it thrive and grow even more to this day. However, he does so in a comedic and knowledgeable manner. Baker makes it known, and even obvious, that he has a lot of knowledge and credibility

Wikipedia is an easily accessible online encyclopedia. Derived from the word wiki which means quick and encyclopedia. Wikipedia is essentially a collaborative group effort to be as detailed and accurate as possible about a subject. It is written mostly by anonymous users who volunteer to write for free, in most cases anyone can edit a page and add to it. Wikipedia operates on the five pillars, or five fundamental principles, to ensure postings are factual and then are reviewed by other users to siphon

Academics in Sydney, Australia are starting to take a more serious look at Wikipedia. They've learned that students in higher education are simply not interested in the traditional way of learning and have embarked on an adventure to let their university students write and edit article on Wikipedia. This is a learning experience for the students and the lecturers at the University of Sydney. Students write articles and they look at the feedback presented by others that read their articles. This is

Adam T. Miller Dr. Baker English 10 31 January 2023 For years English and History teachers everywhere have told their students that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, but are they right about that? Brett Potash recites a common mantra that encapsulates the credibility of Wikipedia, "It only works in practice. In theory, it can never work". When one thinks about the concept of a website anyone can edit, the immediate assumption is that chaos will ensue, vandals will put blatantly false information

There's nothing more convenient than Wikipedia if you're looking for some quick information, and when the stakes are low (you need a piece of information to settle a bet with your roommate, or you want to get a basic sense of what something means before starting more in-depth research), you may get what you need from Wikipedia. In fact, some instructors may advise their students to read entries for scientific concepts on Wikipedia as a way to begin understanding those concepts. Nevertheless, when

Significance of the Study: The controlling purpose of this paper is to prove that reading Wikipedia articles has a positive impact so as to further intensify the program. This paper makes a stand that reading Wikipedia can help a lot to comprehend the point of the intensified program. Rationale: The stand of this paper is that reading Wikipedia is an efficient tool for learning. This further explains that it improves the student’s capability to be globally competitive because it requires them

Wikipedia is a great place to share your information and add to your writing credentials online. However, the site has strict rules and guideline to follow. It is important for new writers on Wikipedia to take some time to study the rules an learn to follow the guidelines very carefully. The rules are concise and should be followed. In this piece we break down the top 3 things for the new contributor to know about writing for Wikipedia. Let's take a closer look. Register It is to your advantage

Efficiently Using Wikipedia When there is a murder case, there are normally many suspects involved in this case. Quite frequently, people who are close to the one murdered are looked into. But, if someone is wrongly reported as being accused, it can damage one’s whole life. This happened to John Seigenthaler. He was wrongly accused on Wikipedia of being a murder suspect. This begs the question: is Wikipedia a reliable source? It is banned from some schools, even though that might be the wrong approach

Wikipedia is a site that most people take advantage of on a regular basis. Generally, the site is thought a great resource for researching subjects or just to learn about special topics. However, Wikipedia has a pronounced gender bias. Most of the writers and contributors are male. Studies show that nearly 90 percent of the contributors are male. Recently, a group met in Brooklyn. They devised an edit-a-thon to discuss the Wikipedia gender gap. Their hope was to cover more women in the arts. The

During high school and college, whenever I was assigned to write a research paper, my professors always emphasize, “Do not use Wikipedia as your source.” I followed this rule pretty well, but I have never thought deeply into the reasons behind why shouldn’t Wikipedia be cited as a source in research papers. After today’s reading, I gained a sense about what Wikipedia is, how it operates, and more importantly why it is an invalid citation for research papers. Wikipedia’s lack of defined authorship

The 15-Year Journey of Wikipedia Everyone, that means almost 100% of internet users, is familiar with Wikipedia. First of all, it is the only encyclopedia people know of and keep visiting online. Despite the dull and solely text-laden layout, it still managed to be on the seventh spot of globally searched website according to Alexa ranking. It is primarily a source of knowledge and has earned its long and hard effort to serve the users. On the 15th of January, Wikipedia celebrated its 15th birthday

I agree with everything that Danah Boyd has to say in “Wikipedia as a Site of Knowledge Production.” Her work is relatable, humorous, and casual, while being compelling. The subject is easy to understand because I often use Wikipedia. She makes it relatable by including the inputs of real students. It appears that she has done a lot of research and interviews on this subject, which gives the reader more real-time information to think about. Boyd tells a personal story within the article, and this