ipl-logo

Cruelty In Machiavelli's The Prince

800 Words4 Pages

In the book “The Prince” there was an advice that was one of the important factors that a prince should have in his knowledge. That was “cruelty and compassion; and whether it is better to be loved than feared” (Machiavelli 1916). It is better to have loved more, or vice versa, the book is a good example of the accuracy of its problems psychological in their early stages is one of the best parts of the mission. The gestation period for cruelty to replace the feeling of a prince, but he likes his subjects united and better, he should not worry loyal. Whether face criticism for his cruelty to his prince for a long time, or reverse. The answer is there should be one or two; it is better to be feared, it is much more difficult if cannot combine …show more content…

A second example is given of Scipio who, because of his mercy, allowed the disease and the lack of discipline among the soldiers. Machiavelli effectively sums up the chapter by saying: So, the question to be loved or feared, my conclusion is that because some men love what they want, but the fear when the prince wants a wise prince should trust that control, not in what it cannot control. Therefore relationships based on fear are reliable, although based on love are, in one case, the prince has control and the other has none. Alexander apprehended Gaza previous afterwards passed going on interested in Egypt, where he remained respond to by means of a captor. Through these achievements, he safeguarded controller of the Mediterranean coastline. In 332 Alexandria the city, which far along developed the commercial center, literary, and scientific of the Greek world. While capturing Alexandria, alexander the great was not heated by the people due to his powerful strategies. The people had respect for him and could not disagree him or stand against him but thou they did not see cruelty from

Show More
Related
340 Words | 2 Pages

Around 330 BC, Alexander the Great while on his conquest of the Persian Empire took areas in today’s Egypt. Here he founded a new city Alexandria which was to become the capital city of the area. The city of Alexandria was to be a major hub of Greek trade throughout the area, and the newly gain wealth

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

He was determined to uphold his fathers dream and take control of Persia. Alexander was considered strategic in his battles and wasn’t scared to go first before his army into war. His appreciation and sympathy for religion and his troops is what makes him such a heroic leader. By these

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Without their trust, Alexander would not have achieved as much as he did. These examples show that Alexander was great because they provided insight into what Alexander achieved. He had to work hard to gain the people’s trust. It all paid off when he was able to say that he was the greatest leader of his time. Today, everyone wants a trustworthy leader.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the Great was a great leader and conquered most of the mediterranean. Alexander the Great has some astonishing accomplishments during the time of his rule and his whole life. Alexander “never lost a battle” in over a decade of conflicts (“8 surprising facts”).

Read More
312 Words | 2 Pages

Referring to the works of Niccolo Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu in succession highlight how truly at opposition the messages are. In spite of the fact that both works aim to create a model of a good leadership , «Tao-te Ching» by Lao-Tzu discusses peace, straightforwardness, and giving the universe a chance to work its will, while «The Qualities of the Prince» by Machiavelli emphasizes the significance of war, and the common depravity of men. There are no specific reasons that these two methods of reasoning ought to be in agreement, one written in the sixth century, and the other the sixteenth, however they are comparable in that they are very honored among society and the quotes taken from the content are frequently cited and considered insightful,

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the Great is still revered today for his large-scale conquer of the known world, this success can be linked to his most important trait. Alexander’s determination was what allowed him to be so successful both on and off the battlefield. The event that prompted Alexander’s world conquer was when he became king of Macedonia in the year 336 BC. Alexander’s starting point was the empire that his father had built up before his death. By using both similar strategies as his father and his own determination, Alexander expanded the already successful empire.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

(“Alexander”)During the final battle in July 332 B.C., eight thousand Phoenicians were reportedly killed, and thirty thousand were taken as slaves. (“Alexander”)The Egyptians welcomed him as a liberator from the hated Persians; they also proclaimed him the son of Amon-Ra, the supreme Egyptian god. Historians think this may be one reason Alexander considered himself divine. To truly understand Alexander the Great, one must understand his later life. He founded the city of Alexandria on the site of the old Greek trading port of Naucratis.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Alexandria is considered to be the best example of ALexander's successful spreading of Greek Culture. Alexander may have been somewhat known as a big-headed, narcissistic leader, so much so as to going as far as to say that he was the son of Zeus, the King of the Gods. But Alexander truly did deserve the title of “The Great”. To be great in history is not to be a nice, sweet person who is kind to everyone, but to be a smart ruler who knows what he wants and gets what he wants. To be great in history is a title that comes with a lot of speculation, but

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

At the age of 20, he inherited the kingdom of Macedonia and had set out on his first mission: conquering Persia. Alexander was given the nickname “Alexander the Great”, due to his success in his Greek empire. However, after taking a closer look at how Alexander maintained his empire and treated his troops, it is evident that he was vain, cruel, and disloyal, which proves that Alexander the Great was not truly great.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

The conquests of Alexander the Great during the 4th century BC undoubtedly transformed the ancient world, bringing people of foreign lands into contact with Greek ideals and customs that spawned a unique Hellenistic period of both decaying and generative traditions. Despite the historical dramatization of Alexander, emphasizing his charisma and intellect as being the driving forces in creating an empire of a size that had never been imagined before, the contexts of cultural tension between Greek and Persian societies, a fractious Greek political state, and civil strife from an overpopulated Greek world greatly supplemented Alexander’s inherent traits in clearing a path for him to rise and embark on a path of conquest in the pursuit of eternal

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the Great is one of the most fascinating and remarkable figures in history. As a military commander, he conquered vast territories and created one of the largest empires the world has ever seen. But what makes Alexander even more interesting is his unique personality, his strategic thinking, and his determination to achieve his goals. In this essay, I will explore the reasons why Alexander the Great is an intriguing figure in history, what makes him unique, and what others have said about him.

Read More
1068 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander’s father triggered the start of his lifelong love of learning and openness to foreign cultures by introducing his son to an ancient Greek philosopher. “Philip II hired Aristotle to tutor Alexander at age 14 in Greek, Hebrew, Babylonian and Latin, rhetoric and justice.” Aristotle taught young Alexander to accept all religions and educated him about the world. Joshua Mark claims, “...as Alexander traveled, he spread Greek thought and culture in his wake, thus "hellenizing" (to make `Greek’ in culture and civilization) those he conquered.” While Alexander fought in battles, he left his knowledge and beliefs of the Greek culture in the areas he fought.

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander’s arrival to Egypt provided benefits for both the Greeks and Egyptians, embracing the religion of the area, and paved the way for what would later be the Egyptian Empire. One of the most significant and most prosperous generals in all of history was Alexander the Great. He was described as a” scintillating, patient and often devious man that struck with careful planning. ”1 Alexander made decisions with great agility and took exceptional risks, his prosperity was resolved by his show of precipitous force and his will to overcome.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

In the old ages, when men leaded they had to do things that would insure the safety of the empire, but sometimes men go over the top and can become ruthless. Alexander the Great had to face things that were caused by his father’s ruling, but it counted against him. I believe Alexander was “great” because of his conquest to unite Greece and to him conquering Persia. He controlled his kingdom with an iron fist and that is needed when you have uprisings. When coming into power, Alexander was faced with one of the hardest obstacles, he had been having revolts in Macedonia, his homeland, but then Thebes declared Independence from Alexander.

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Machiavelli believed that men will follow a ruler as long as the ruler serves their interests, and a quick to turn against the ruler unless they fear great punishment. Machiavelli would say that it is best to be feared rather than loved as long as the fear does not cause hate, which he believed to be perfectly possible.

Read More

More about Cruelty In Machiavelli's The Prince

Related Topics

Open Document