Alexander v. Prince Philip th ag Alexander the Great was the ruler of macedonia after his father and is considered one of the greatest military leaders of all time. Prince Philip married queen Elizabeth in 1947 and served in the navy throughout world war two, the navy and combat planes are still part of his life. Although both Alexander the Great and Prince Philip were good leaders, Alexander had far more astonishing accomplishments then Prince Philip did in a much shorter time span. Alexander the Great was a great leader and conquered most of the mediterranean. Alexander the Great has some astonishing accomplishments during the time of his rule and his whole life. Alexander “never lost a battle” in over a decade of conflicts (“8 surprising facts”). …show more content…
All together Prince Philip was a good naval leader and had many accomplishments during his life. Alexander the Great was a better leader than Prince Philip because of the mass size of what he did for his people in such a short time. Alexander the Great and his accomplishments can not be expressed enough, he tried his hardest to be the best he could for his people. Alexander “went on to conquer Persia and Egypt”(Alexander the Great). In the year of 330 “he is called Lord of Asia”(Alexander the Great). Everything Alexander the Great had done that was already amazing was enhanced by the time span it was done in. Alexander “had reigned for 12 years and 8 months”(Alexander the Great / Biography). Alexander “conquered Persia and Egypt” in only 12 years (Alexander the Great). Although Prince Philip was a great naval leader he was not anything like the king of Greece. Prince Philip served in the navy during “the second world war”(Prince Philip Biography). Prince Philip wanted to conserve wildlife making him “uk president of the world wildlife fund”(Prince Philip Biography). All and all Alexander the Great is far more superior to Prince