This is the highest professional rating that Martindale-Hubbell offers to practicing US lawyers. Michael Ira Asen embarked on his career as a federal defender with United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, handling a number of cases that involved accusations of white-collar and organized crime. For the past 14 years, he has represented a large number of consumer goods merchants in the areas of civil recovery and employee restitutions after incidences of retail theft. Currently licensed to practice before six different federal courts in New York and New Jersey, Mr. Asen operates his own private practice in Greenvale, New York. In addition to maintaining this practice, he is a founder of the Sound Shore Symphony Orchestra and a lecturer for the National Business Institute.
Portrait two discusses the Ryan Haight Act of 2008 and how it came about. Back in the year of 2001 there was a young man by the name of Ryan Haight. He was a well-known athlete as well as an A student from La Mesa, California. At the age of 18 Ryan died from an overdose due to high usage of Vicodin that he received from the Internet. He had no intentions of abusing the drug and was only taking the medication in order to relief his back pain.
In the past few years, the United States has seen a huge spike in the money spent in federal elections (See Appendix 4.B). Not only have candidates been making greater efforts to communicate their ideas to the American public, but super PACs have also been displaying their support for candidates and their political policies; they do so by using their right to accept unlimited donations from the public and later, use that money to promote certain candidates, or to sway voters in a desired direction. The immense power that super PACs have to sway voters has come under harsh criticism, spurring the creation of new laws and limits on the super PACs in an attempt to keep them in check and to avoid possible corruption. These limits on super
Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health What is the value of a life? Do family members always have the patients’ best interest in mind when making medical decisions? Who should ultimately make the decision of life or death for patients that will never leave a permanent vegetative state? Lester and Joyce Cruzan faced an issue no parent ever wants to face after their daughter, Nancy was in a horrific car accident that left her in a persistent vegetative state.
Supporters of this decision argued that money does not corrupt, while critics believe that it is basically bribery (Montana). In 2011, the state of Montana tried to challenge the US Supreme Court decision by arguing that outside money caused corruption. Montana wanted to uphold their 1912 Corrupt Law, which banned corporations from giving money to campaigns and also acquired disclosure on who gave money to campaigns (Big Sky). The state did not want outside groups manipulating the message and ads of their elections or influencing voters. When it came to the court decision, the court made a 5-to-2 vote, stating that the state of Montana “cannot ignore the Citizens United decision” (Montana).
Stark Law was created with the purpose of forbidding providers from self-referring Medicare patients to others Medicare payable facilities for designed health services (DHS), where providers or one of their immediate family members has the direct or indirect financial relationship (Cleverly & Cleverly, 2017, p. 108). The law states that providers cannot bill Medicare or Medicaid for services provided under the disallow referrals and Medicare and Medicaid will not pay for those services. Violation of the law can results in the civil fines of up to $15000 per claim plus the double amount of reimbursements and $100000 for deliberately sidestep the law. Therefore, violation of the law by sending claims for small amounts of money to Medicare and
Ashley Smith CRJU 1400 LU 7 Review Questions Review Questions for Learning Unit Seven What governs the ethical conduct of lawyers? Discuss the pros and cons of plea bargaining. What has the U.S. Supreme Court held in regards to the professional misconduct of prosecutors? (in terms of punishment) How do forfeiture laws help to deter the conduct of mob lawyers?
Kids ranging from 8-15 years are tried as a juvenile and to transfer the case into adult court, they would fill out an application to do so. Kids committing crimes such as armed robbery, rape, or even murder should be tried as an adult. This type of allegation will not go unseen just because he/ she is a child. Even though these criminals are children, they will not or should not be exempt from the law or juvenile justice system.
Many officeholders, legislators, and members of Academia argue that the supreme court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission has single-handedly destroyed American democracy as we know it. This case is one of many that, in essence, allows legalized bribery to occur within the American political system, with most large money contributions to politicians coming from sizably influential corporations. Although many elected officials believe corporate money in politics strengthens democracy, it contrarily damages democracy and is the reason campaign finance reform is the greatest issue facing American politics. Since 1976, the US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of cases like Buckley v. Valeo and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, which claims corporations are considered people; and based on First Amendment rights, people are allowed to spend their money within the political arena. Citizens United v. FEC is the supreme court decision that has led to further corruption within the American campaign finance system, while halting efforts to minimize money in politics.
In conclusion, the Sherman antitrust has made the economy better, by avoiding prices going up and products being inferior, the government promotes competition among companies as a form of an antitrust law. The act is enforced as an intervention to the invisible hand to develop progress, jobs, technologies, and fair competition.
Introduction: Mark Bittman, a food journalist, published the article “Who Protects the Animals?” in New York Times. In this article, he coined the term “ag-gag” law. It is a term to describe the law to prohibit whistleblower who takes photograph and film scenes related to animal abuse problems on industrial farm. It even prohibits anyone who distrubate it, whichs means a anayoums submit the evident of animal abuse.
Congress’s processes for reviewing and debating proposed legislation may be streamlined because, with the executive branch, the constituents, and the interest groups, it can help the process run smoothly. It should be streamlined because the executive branch aims at improving the function of the departments or agencies that Congress already has created as the constituents make telephone calls, respond to public opinion polls, and send faxes to keep in reach with their elected officials. Individuals and groups seek to influence members of Congress and legislation through lobbying, which they have to be well informed, knowledgeable, organized, and cooperative in order to convey others. The values that are served by streamlining is it helps to
The Drug Enforcement Administration has been investigated in the past year. Agents were found to be a frequent patron of prostitutes, soliciting sex from undercover police officers, engaging in sex parties thrown by drug cartels, and accepting gifts from drug cartels. The agents who did not resign from their position received relatively minor punishments. The case was opened September 18, 2014 (Full Senate Committee, 2014). The investigation is opened in order to decide if there is a need to make adjustments to the administration.
Let 's say a pharmaceutical company pays for a congressman 's campaign. Once a bill comes that would drop drug prices that elected congressman would vote against it (Secular talk). This has been happening for awhile now but i think that it 's time to get money out of
There is no one name for the case of Frank Abagnale. He was tried in France, Sweden, Italy, and then finally the United States. Therefore, it is reasonable to call the case The United States versus Frank Abagnale. He was accused of bank fraud, identity fraud, and professional con artist. A great criminal always starts young.
