ipl-logo

The Folly Of Humanity In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

681 Words3 Pages

There are numerous moments throughout the play Julius Caesar that illustrates the folly of humanity. Without it, none of the play would have even been possible. From getting Brutus on the conspirators side, to Cassius’ original plot to kill Caesar, this nature is what made the foundation for the story. From the human urge to seek revenge, to the mind’s tendency to change its opinion on a matter, these traits are the two that set the stage for the fall of Caesar.

Throughout the course of the play, Julius Caesar, we are introduced to many instances of the folly of humanity. One of which is revenge. Revenge is ugly and messy, it has no bounds of where it’ll stop. After the assassination of Julius Caesar, his right hand man, Mark Antony, speaks …show more content…

Then burst his mighty heart, And in his mantle muffling up his face, Even at the base of Pompey's statue, Which all the while ran blood, great Caesar fell. O, what a fall was there, my countrymen! Then I, and you, and all of us fell down, Whilst bloody treason flourished over us. O, now you weep, and I perceive you feel The dint of pity — these are gracious drops. Kind souls, what weep you when you but behold Our Caesar's vesture wounded? Look you here! Here is himself, marred as you see with traitors” (Shakespeare 3.2.178-193). Mark Antony completely turned the people against the conspirators. To the people, they were nothing more than murderers. They had killed Caesar and deserved to be punished. Mark manipulated the people into doing his dirty work for him. As the people were parading the streets, marching towards Brutus’ house, with torches and Caesar’s body, Mark Antony said, “Now let it work! Mischief, thou art afoot, Take thou what course thou wilt” (Shakespeare 3.2.253-254a). We saw his true intentions in this line, Mark Antony overall had used the situation to his advantage. That cunningness, that ambition for revenge, is what made not only him, but the mob human as well. But what made the mob work in his favor was their ability to be easily swayed and …show more content…

The shock of Caesar’s demise was what ultimately led to the mob. The mob was human because of their emotions and their ability to be easily swayed in either direction. When Brutus had finished his speech, originally, the plebeians were saying things like he should be the new Caesar or to give him a statue. The mob saw Brutus as such an honorable man, one who should be trusted. But as soon as they saw Caesar and heard Mark Antony’s speech, they were so easily swayed that they were going to burn down Brutus’ home. “Revenge! About! Seek! Burn! Fire! Kill! Slay! Let not a traitor live!” (Shakespeare 3.2.198-199a). The crowd instantly became enraged, not believing such an atrocity could have ever happened. They all immediately took the body and went to destroy Brutus’ home. They were human because just a moment ago they were praising Brutus, but now they all were in favor of killing him. They were easily swayed and without this human trait, Mark’s plan would have failed. Overall, only their humanity made this entire plan possible, from their ability to seek revenge, to their tendency to be easily swayed, that’s the true genius behind this

Show More
Related
1035 Words | 5 Pages

However, they were not alone- with Mark Antony rising in fury for justice to Caesar. Each opposer gave a speech at the funeral of Caesar for their cause. Brutus in formality, attempted to convey his reasoning in executing the murder, as a representative of the conspirators. Using many rhetorical devices including pathos and logos, the crowd is swooned with his perception. Brutus's victory is short lived, because as soon as Mark Antony steps up, his tactics of persuasion,

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

Julius Caesar was ambushed by his own people. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Caesar is killed by his own people. After he is killed, Brutus and Antony address the crowd growing outside of the Capitol. In Mark Antony’s confrontational speech to the mourners, he establishes his argument that there was no real reason to kill Caesar by convincing the crowd that Caesar is ambitious; he then develops his argument by using pathos, ethos, and logos to change the mob’s stance and ultimately ends his speech by convincing the crowd that Brutus is to blame for Caesar’s death. The first way Antony persuades the audience is through his use of pathos.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

When Mark Antony sees Caesar dead he plans to rebel against Brutus and cause a riot. He goes up to the people of Rome and proves to them that Caesar had no intention of turning his back on them. Mark Antony uses pathos, logos and ethos to convince the people of Rome that Caesar did not deserve to be killed. Mark Antony uses pathos effectively in his speech to persuade the people of Rome to rebel against Brutus. Antony’s speech was meant to give strong emotion towards the audience

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Many people sacrifice their lives and die in the play Julius Caesar. Many of those who did not,were willing to die for their convictions. This essay will examine every catastrophe, including suicides and homicides. "Cowards die many times before their deaths; The valiant never taste death but once. "

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

The commoners begin to sympathize with Antony during his dramatic pause. To compound upon their pity, Antony graphically describes the stabbings the conspirators inflicted upon Caesar. While the Romans are gathered around Caesar’s body, Antony uses dramatic irony, “This was the most unkindest cut of all;/ For when the noble Caesar saw him stab,/ Ingratitude, more strong than the traitors’ arms,/ Quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart;” (3.2. 183-186). Antony’s rage against the conspirators incites anger and grief within the mourning crowd.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar a play by William Shakespeare depicting the tragedy of the historic death of the famous ruler of Rome which the work is named after. The author uses a combination of Logos, Pathos, and Ethos to capture the reader's attention and emotions throughout the story. However, these rhetorical references are most prevalent during the speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony to the commoners at Caesar’s funeral. The speakers use these strategies to attempt to gain the people's support their cause. The winner of this debate is Antony who draws a revolution together to battle the conspirators that killed his dear Caesar.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

Mark Antony's speech got the crowd feeling angry towards Caesar which made the forget that he had murdered

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, a Brutus plots the death of his friend Caesar, a successful leader, for the good of Rome. Mark Antony, Caesar’s loyal friend, plans revenge over the murder of Caesar. Although Mark Antony seems manipulative, impulsive, and unscrupulous, he is actually a gifted orator, and a shrewd and charismatic that made him an effective leader. Firstly, the Romans saw Antony as charismatic leader.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Blake Brennan F 9CP2 English Ms. Bradley March 23, 2023 Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay Having strong persuasive language will compel people to change their views about a topic. The play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, follows a group of conspirators and the aftermath of Julius Caesar's assassination. During Caesar's funeral, Brutus, a conspirator, makes a response that manipulates the plebeians' to rebel against Caesar. By saying this, Brutus persuades the plebeians to trust him and not Caesar. However, Caesar’s right-hand man, Mark Antony, does not like the conspirators nor Brutus, so he desires revenge.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Slay! Let not a traitor live!” (3.2.214). The citizens support Antony’s loyalty to Caesar and no longer like Brutus and the conspirators for being disloyal to Caesar. Mark Anthony’s true loyalty to Caesar is shown through his emotional response and actions.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

We all know the classic Shakespeare’s “Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. For decades, people have been hooked on the story’s incorporation of betrayal, power, and murder. However, one must look at the underlying factors that contribute to the plot itself. Ambition, political intrigue, and conspiracy plays a role on The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by enhancing the plot, capturing the audiences’ attention, and manifesting Shakespearean ideology.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

Yet Brutus says he was ambitious…” (Shakespeare 3.2.90-97.). Antony knows that if he gives the people reasons to love Caesar that they will turn on Brutus. The power his words have over them turn the plebeians on all Brutus has said and makes the people want to kill Brutus for taking away dear Caesar. The influence Antony’s words have brought the people to take action on Brutus and the conspirators, and this circumstance is just one example of how the power of words can bring about action.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Antonys Argument No one likes to be used or misled. Brutus seemed to be doing exactly that to his people, so, was he actually? Antony appeals to the people's emotions and uses them to his advantage bringing the truth to light. In William Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, we saw Caesar was seen as a noble, power-hungry, intelligent man who was betrayed by his fellow men whom he held so closely.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

However, by stopping Brutus’s plan to end tyranny, he became a tyrant himself in the future, once again defeating Brutus at the end of the play. The success of Antony in this one speech had a drastic effect on the outcome of the play. Upon the conclusion of the two speeches, the winner was decided quite easily by the crowd, demonstrating the power of rhetoric. Having the full support of his audience, Antony easily triumphed over his foes and became one of the leaders of Rome, which had not been his intention in the beginning either. At the end of the play, Mark Antony, as foreshadowed, triumphs over Brutus and the other conspirators, and becomes a tyrant of

Read More

More about The Folly Of Humanity In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document