ipl-logo

The Great Dilemma In Aristotle And Rubik's The Great Dilemma

815 Words4 Pages

The Great Dilemma
Introduction:
It is a very difficult task to find an individual, who has never ever heard about the dilemma of chicken and egg. Traditionally, this debate is originating from very old times. It is considered that several Greek philosophers, such as Aristotle and Plutarch [1], analyzed and set the question among one of the first people in the history. Although this problem was set in faraway Ancient Greece, its topicality is still on a very high level. Briefly, this antinomy discusses the question of chicken and egg’s primacy. On the one hand, if chicken has originated first, it should have been coming from some egg. On the other hand, while thinking that egg was the precedent, one might imply that egg itself was the product of some chicken. People use this particular paradox whenever there is a reference to questions with …show more content…

Firstly, it is the question of people’s professional interest. Actually, many thinkers and scientists are scratching their heads in order to find an exact answer on this dilemma. Perhaps one can imagine gratification they get, when someone finds the solution and it is finally over - it is like solving the Rubik’s Cube. Secondly, chicken or egg dilemma could help in understanding a right direction of development and expanding the general knowledge. If people discover that scientific theory is the right one and egg is the winner, then biological dissidents, not believing in evolutionary theory, might change their minds to confirm their mistakenness. Until somebody does not find an exact answer to the problem of chicken and egg, it will captivate the interest of people and make them think a bit about theoretical solutions. As thinking has never harmed anyone, only contributed to overall development- one might eventually come up with idea that the paradox of chicken and egg has good effects for our

Show More
Related
98 Words | 1 Pages

I personally feel Pollan’s dilemma in the order he states it. The question “What should I have for dinner?” is a relevant statement in my everyday life. This essentially is the omnivore 's dilemma. Since humans are indeed omnivores, we can eat whatever we want. The dilemma surfaces when what we are consuming has repercussions.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

“Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat”, is a famous quote by the well known philosopher Socrates, who believed this is the perspective we should take when we are eating food. Unfortunately, the times have changed and so has the way we eat. We no longer have to go hunting for our food, or grow crops to receive all of our fruits and vegetables. Because we have become a society that has grown into the new world of technology, there would be no need to rely on ourselves for what we need-- we can simply gather our resources from other people. In the book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma”, written by Michael Pollan, takes us on a journey full of concerns of the “Food Industrial Complex”.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Assignment 5 In the Politics, Aristotle describes three basic sorts of people, known as the beast, the citizen, and the god. Gods and beasts are both barbaric to Aristotle, because their ends are needs, not virtue. This is illustrated on page 109 when he says, “He who is without a polis, by reason of his own nature and not of some accident, is either a poor sort of being, or a being higher than man” (Aristotle, 1996, pg. 109.) This means that man is either a beast or a god if he chooses to be apart from the polis.

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

Ambar Delacruz Essay 1: The Omnivore’s Dilemma. Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma addresses a variety of concerns about food production and consumption. One might ask what exactly is the omnivore’s dilemma? And the basic answer to this question is “what should we eat for dinner”?

Read More
1118 Words | 5 Pages

In this paper I will argue that Socrates’s argument at 50a-b of the Crito would be not harming his fellow citizens by breaking the laws. Based on the readings from Plato’s The Five Dialogues, I will go over the reasoning of Socrates’ view on the good life. I will then discuss the three arguments Crito has for Socrates regarding his evasion of the death sentence including the selfish, the practicality, and the moral arguments. I will deliberate an objection to the argument and reply to the objections made in the paper and conclude with final thoughts. Socrates argues in the Crito that he should not escape or disobey the law because it is unethical.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

What does the phrase, “the omnivore 's dilemma,” mean? Well, we can start off by describing an omnivore . From our class notes, an omnivore is defined as, “an animal, person, or organism that is able to eat both plants, animals, and fungi” . A dilemma is a challenging or difficult situation or problem in which you have to make a choice. The omnivore’s dilemma is a problem considered when omnivores need to choose what to

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

Socrates’ Arguments in the Crito In The Crito, Socrates argues that he should not escape prison because it would be morally incorrect. He says that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Therefore, by escaping prison, not only will he suffer the consequences but also his family, his friends, and the city of Athens. Socrates argues that the city of Athens would be affected if he escapes from prison.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics begins by exploring ‘the good’. Book I argues that, unlike other goods, “happiness appears to be something complete and self-sufficient, and is, therefore, the end of actions” (10:1097b20-21). In other words, happiness is the ultimate good. But how does one achieve happiness? Aristotle formulates this in the context of work, since for all things, from artists to horses, “the good and the doing it well seem to be in the work” (10:1097b27-28).

Read More
1060 Words | 5 Pages

In order to establish my thesis, I will start by stating and explaining the argument that Socrates presents, I will

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Pojman asserts that this question highlights the question whether or not morality and religion are intertwined. Moreover, Socrates’ comments and critiques of Euthyphro’s claims provide readers a powerful model for what true dialectic thus promoting the development of a strong intellectual spine and the true core of

Read More
2363 Words | 10 Pages

1. Explain Aristotle’s defense of real change and real difference against Parmenides. The Argument of Parmenides originated as a Pre Socratic Philosopher on the question of the day. “What is the nature of reality?

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

Many classical philosophers have given their voice to the nature of human life and what entails its climax. The very nature of human beings has been investigated, broadly, to establish a comprehensive understanding often pegged on morality. Yet, such thoughts have prompted diverse viewpoints with accompanying grounds or reasons. Happiness is an unending topic of discussion in philosophy. This paper explores the similarities and differences in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism to coin a position in whether or not happiness is the ultimate end that human society aspires to acquire.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

Parallels between Aristotle’s Poetics and Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman Aristotle wrote Poetics in 335BC and in that discourse he defined the elements of a tragedy and compared it to other plays like an Epic. Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, which was written over two thousand years after Aristotle’s Poetics, can easily be considered a modern Aristotelian tragedy. Thereby, a study of Death of a Salesman can help us to understand Aristotle’s Poetics. First off, Aristotle defines a tragedy as “an imitation of an action that is serious and also, as having magnitude, complete in itself; in appropriate and pleasurable language;… in a dramatic rather than narrative form; with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish a

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

A disadvantage of artificial selection is stated on, “Lee County Students”, saying that “However, genetic modification is highly controversial.” This is a disadvantage because artificial selection is not fully proven to work, and there are not many studies that show it works easily. Another disadvantage of artificial selection is an unexpected result. There are many different outcomes of artificial selection and can be a surprise to the organism and owner, stated on “Pros and Cons of Artificial Selection”. A final disadvantage of artificial selection is shortened life.

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

If Plato had portrayed an Ideal State in hid republic which could be built in heaven only, Aristotle came down to earth while drawing the outline of his ideal state. Like a true scientist he does not attempt any impossible scheme in formulating his theory if Ideal State. His ideal state is attainable on his earth. We must first consider not only what is ideal but also what is the best attainable in actual practice. The only difference between a monarchy and an aristocracy is that in the first case virtue is centered in one person.

Read More

More about The Great Dilemma In Aristotle And Rubik's The Great Dilemma

Related Topics

Open Document