More handpicked essays just for you.
Cause of the downfall of Roman Empire
Cause of the downfall of Roman Empire
Cause of the downfall of Roman Empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rome flourished in every way possible, excelling in peace, prosperity, and order. However, during the third century, the empire almost collapsed, a consequence of poor leadership, weak military, numerous invasions, and overexpansion. Poor leadership
In Rome, there were 22 different emperors in only a 50-year time period from 235-285 CE (Doc A). Another way that the Roman government was failing, according to Document B, is because the emperor allowed his soldiers to stop wearing armor and he didn’t enforce the draft. Similarly, Document E says that the Roman people believed that their government was ruining the state and that they lived better under the rule of the Huns. The Roman Empire having 33 different leaders was a sign that it had a weak government because of the inconsistency.
Many Roman emperors only lasted about a year as rulers which led to the Roman people not truly making a connection/bond with the emperor who served which led to
During the Pax Romana the Roman Empire grew and prospered. Before this time period of great rulers Rome had a lot of corrupt rulers. There were five incredible emperors known as Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius, and Marcus Aurelius (Spielvogel 292). Trajan was known as the best ruler. He was a successful and powerful leader.
The fall of the Roman Empire, where every leader gets murdered along with the military. Rome was the most powerful empire in the ancient world until it fell. The three primary reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire are weakened military and invasions, too much territory to govern, and faulty leadership. One of the primary reasons why Rome fell was that it suffered from a weakened military and invasions.
Emperor Nero was a very crazed insane Emperor lacking many things during his rule over Rome. The first thing he lacked was sanity. Nero was so crazy that when Rome was burning down to ashes he ran away to play the lyre instead of helping the people escape. Nero also lacked selflessness he was way more selfish than selfless and the reason why is because after the fire in Rome burned down he decided to take everybody's money and spend it on an
In contrast to Caligula’s reason of madness in the case of Nero there was no sign of reason only that he as well suffered from a mental ailment in more ways than one the illness was a family trait since, yet Nero’s actions were to differ from Caligula in persecution of Christians, the endless depraved sexual encounters with both gender and lastly the way he governed showed that he loved the arts, and the theater thus giving the history some art works as well for coins. Covering the way his rule was not his own but his mother’s and tutors when they were gone, and he was clear to rule he killed or divorced his wives, but his actions always effected the Roman empire. In particular in 64 A.D, the Great Fire that set Rome ablaze for six days a historian Tacitus the saw four districts of the city burn in stating, “The city four were undamaged, three were destroyed and in the seven
Some flaws can make you a good or a bad leader, depending on how they are used or directed. One of these such traits is ambition. Marc Antony was very ambitious, which could have been very good for him as leader, but he was so ambitious that he killed his own family members. This is very important, because he does this to not anger his fellow rulers of Rome. If someone is willing to kill off their own family, then how can one know they will not kill others to stay in power?
To lead means to “be in charge or command of”. To run a large city like Rome, the citizens need someone like Brutus to “take charge” or “command”. To be a good leader means to have courage, integrity, and kindness. Brutus was the most pleasing leader of all the men. He showed great acts of leadership throughout the duration of his life and thought of others rather than himself.
People have a natural urge to want power, and when there are opportunities to seize power, people take them. Throughout history there have been countless civilizations and societies governed by poor and unqualified leaders, that have detrimentally affected the people and the society. It is because of poor leaders that leads to the downfalls of cultures and the loss of countless people. This is exactly what occurred during the French Revolution, many poor leaders lead to the loss of thousands of lives. The weak and insufficient leadership of the french people lead to the reign of terror and more radical actions.
The first emperor to ever rule Rome was Augustus. Next came the Julio-Claudian Emperors and they ruled after Augustus. Also the emperors were never succeeded by their biological sons or their heirs. Next came the Good Emperors and according to study.com it said “The Five Good Emperors brought relative peace, stability, and prosperity to Rome.” And according to study.com they said “The reign of the Five Good Emperors was characterized by the adopting of one’s heir to the throne, rather than the crown simply going to a biological son or whoever was strong enough to take it.”
For example, “ In a city so great and so corrupt Catiline found it a very easy matter to surround himself, as by a bodyguard, with troops of criminals and reprobates of every kind.” This just shows that even though citizens owed Rome loyalty and honesty it was just too corrupt that people had to turn on it. The strength of Rome's relationship with its citizens suffered leaving some of its not so great people to actually side with Catiline only hurting it
Imagine what it would be like to be betrayed by the people you trust most. Imagine literally being “stabbed in the back” by your closest friends. In Shakespeare’s infamous play Julius Caesar, this indeed does happen; a man by the name of Julius Caesar is assassinated by some of his closest companions. Julius Caesar was a well-renowned leader in real life and in the play. Any ideal leader has key qualities such as being very intelligent, takes charge whenever possible, and is passionate for their country.
Unlike conventional rulers, Nero came from a humble background. He himself was not responsible for becoming a ruler, but his complex familial ties, notably that of his mother, propelled him into political circumstances. Once in power, Nero was initially characterised by generosity, competence, and a seemingly liberal stance, but this quickly declined as his true nature surfaced. From this point onwards, Nero would be remembered for his sheer tyranny, bloodthirst, and corruption. His megalomania can even be compared to dictators centuries later, such as Saddam
In Document A, it shows 19 Roman Emperors in the 50 years of 235-285 CE. Thirteen of the nineteen leaders were assassinated or possibly assassinated. This perhaps is because of weak leadership or only wanting the power for themselves. Citizens were also upset with how the government was not “not possessing the spirit of former generations” and because of this, it was “ruining the state.” (Doc E)
