ipl-logo

The Importance Of Hannibal's Victory In The Punic Wars

455 Words2 Pages

Both Carthage and Rome fought long and hard for the victories of the Punic Wars. . The Punic Wars were an example of Rome's great wealth and size, and Cartridges leaders, strategies and government. Hannibal strategies, bravery and determination led him to be very successful in the first Punic War, but because of his lack of support from the council and small army, gave rome a great leg up, leading them to victory. If Rome's wealth and size was removed they would not have had conquered Carthage. Hannibal was not only a strong leader, but also had the knowledge of warfare that Romans could not dream of. Hannibal grew up being taught the art of war by his father who wanted to conquer Rome. Hannibal took an oath to dedicate his life to destroy rome.Once his father had been killed he stepped up and decided to fill his father's shoes. Hannibal's war tactics that were passed on through his father lead him through the first Punic Wars With flying colors. But when the third war rolled around the council denied him help and support, so his army was much smaller than the one that Rome had built. If the council had supported him and provided him with a bigger army, he would have without a doubt won against Rome. His knowledge was more than double of Sco. If Rome's wealth and size were irrelevant, Hannibal and Carthage would have …show more content…

Unfortunately these two things were things that Carthage lacked. The Roman army was much larger than the Carthage army which gave them an immediate advantage over carthage. Rome's lack of knowledge and strategies were apparent when Carthage beat them in the first punic wars easily, but their army size and growth of knowledge led them to victory in the third. If the two armies were the same size, the Carthage army would destroy the Roman army because even with the Roman improvement they would not even come close to the knowledge and strategies that Hannibal had studied all of his

Show More
Related
1182 Words | 5 Pages

But the Romans did not have any planning and that is why the empire grew weaker and weaker. The soldiers did not know how to fight anymore and were badly injured because of the decision to not wear armor. The Roman military was no match to some other armies but most importantly the Huns, a group that exceeded the rate of which they conquered everything in their path. They are very tough and will not back down without a challenge. Document D describes the Huns, ”Fired with an overwhelming desire for seizing the properties of others, the Swift moving and ungovernable people make their destructive way amid the pillage and slaughter of those who live around them” The fall of Rome is Attributed to invasions and Military break down because of this very purpose, there was finally a group that could overtake and overpower the army.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

War would be Rome’s primary tool for expansion, they learned swiftly to be defiant in the face of danger. Near the end of the trouble with Carthage they refused to surrender and in so doing they chose an uncertain future. History shows Rome triumphed in the end, Rome’s army was able to adapt to virtually every situation. “For while the Carthaginians entrust the preservation of their liberty to the care of venal troops; the Romans place all their confidence in their own bravery, and in the assistance of their allies. From hence it happens, that the Romans, though at first defeated, are always able to renew the war; […].”

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman empire was one of the most powerful to ever exist and influenced all of Europe with their designs and battle strategies, even today Their impact is evident. The Romans changed European first century warfare forever with their superior army and tactics. The Romans were powerful due to the sheer number of soldiers they possessed, the equipment given to each soldier, and the training each member received to prepare for battle. Of course the Romans had innovations of their own but it was not above them to borrow techniques and styles from other cultures, like the Greeks for instance. The Romans also took equipment types from other European cultures as well, like plate armor.

Read More
351 Words | 2 Pages

Rome also wanted to cut into the Mediterranean trade, Carthage was very upset when they found out these things about Rome. Rome is mostly seen as the complete aggressor in the Punic War. Rome also wanted to absorb sicilly, which was partially owned by Carthage. All of Rome’s aggressive actions really bothered Carthage.

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

In 61 CE, the Romans were able to defeat and conquer Britain. However, in the Battle of Cannae in 216 BCE, they were heavily defeated and somewhat humiliated. This was due to change of tactics and rulers. Rome had a military system that proved to not be successful. They would have a different military leader every day and those leaders were not that well trained nor did not have a vast knowledge of warfare.

Read More
1475 Words | 6 Pages

One is also left with the impression that the Romans made every attempt to maintain past treaties with Carthage but that the Carthaginians and Hannibal in particular were set on war. This is exactly what Livy intended when writing on the Second Punic War. The problem is that Livy seems to be writing propaganda more than history. His purpose is to thrust the blame for the war solely on Carthage and Hannibal and leave Rome blameless in the eyes of potential readers. Whether or not this was what Livy actually believed is impossible to know for

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

Carthage. It consisted mostly of Italian mercenaries and leftover mercenaries from the beginning of the campaign. Hannibal had around eighteen-thousand men yet when he reached Carthage he had an additional twenty five-thousand inexperienced levies from allies and the city’s garrison. Once ready they rallied out of Carthage to fight the Romans one last time on October 19th, 202 BC. Scipio Africanus was down by ten-thousand however, Scipio had the upper advantage.

Read More
235 Words | 1 Pages

Rome 's success was basically due to skillful diplomacy and to its loyal, well-trained army. Another way they were successful is by the build up of their army. Those who were defeated were recruited. Those

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

The Romans, more experienced at sea battles now and had, won a series of decisive victories over Carthage in 241B.C. E the Carthaginians sued for peace"(J. Mark). The Roman military

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Fabius couldn't beat Hannibal if he tried fighting on Carthaginian terms, and him dragging out the war was hurting Hannibal more than it was him. Sun Tzu advises against keeping an army in action in enemy lands because “There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare,” and for every day Hannibal sat in Rome waiting for an opportunity to attack, he wasted more resources and money.7 Had Fabius stayed in control of the Roman army, there's no doubt he would have triumphed over Hannibal. Although the Carthaginians successfully defeated Flaminius, they were not able to counter a general who actually knew not to fall for their tactical tricks. In Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars: Book 2, Caesar writes about the Gauls rebelling against the Romans.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

According to Machievelli Scipio “was limited in the range of actions he could take… because it could damage his reputation which was seen as spotless among his soldiers” (Eudaimonia). One of the only things that backfired on Hannibal was that with the respect from soldiers, and fear from Romans “the Carthaginian Senate repeatedly refused Hanibal’s requests for aid and supplies'' which may have been from their own selfishness, or because they feared Hannibal would become too powerful and take over Carthage (Mark). Instilling fear into the Romans which caused his men, and later even the Romans, to respect him was a good thing since fear always stays with people, while love is hard to maintain. As Machiavelli says,“ love is held by a bond of obligation which, since men are shabby, is broken for their own utility upon every occasion;but timorousness is secured by fear of punishment which never lets you go” (Machiavelli). Even after eventually losing the war, and after his passing, Hannibal was still respected, and the Romans even built a statue of him to show their ability to beat such a great nemesis which just proves how influential

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

Introduction Rome and Carthage were almost equal in strength and resources. From the early days of the Republic, Rome and Carthage maintained a friendly relationship and even signed a treaty against Pyrrhus, king of Epirus, who was a threat to both states. Comparison Ancient Carthage was a wealthy state with a small population, it employed foreigners to do the unwanted jobs and relied on foreign mercenaries rather than citizens to do her fighting. The mercenaries did not have a sense of belonging to the Carthaginian nation.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

He was always courageous and persistent in battle, which made many individuals admire him. Similarly, Julius Caesar was a leader of Ancient Rome. In the beginning of Caesar’s reign, he

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

So because of the Roman soldier being replaced by German mercenaries and the stoppage of expansion the Roman military lost its power. When the invasions of the western tribes came and destroyed Rome, there was nothing they could

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

The Comparable power it is showed during the second Punic war and shaken the power of Romans. At the end declines from the war and finally lost seriously, and the war ended forever by Roman declaration. The Second Punic War finally placed in an end to Carthage’s empire in the western Mediterranean, give a chance to Rome in control of Spain and letting Carthage hold and keep only its territory in North Africa. The Carthage also required this time to give up its belief and pay the plentiful fine to the Romans in silver (Morey, 1901).The bottom line is the war over with the Roman

Read More

More about The Importance Of Hannibal's Victory In The Punic Wars

Related Topics

Open Document