ipl-logo

The Importance Of Hate Speech In Canada

1337 Words6 Pages

In Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott [2013] the Supreme Court looks at a case of potential hate speech and defines what constitutes as hate speech. I agree with the court finding the pamphlets a form of hate speech and plan to argue that they should not be protected. To begin this essay, I will consider the facts of the case and discuss the outcome. Second, I will look at the case of R v Butler and analyze how they are similar in nature. Next, I will argue that the court made the right choice in deciding the pamphlets constitute as hate speech, and should not be protected under section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott [2013] Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) …show more content…

“The courts... [determined] as best they [could] what the community would tolerate others being exposed to on the basis of the degree of harm that may flow from such exposure.” (R. v. Butler, 1992, p. 15) The public did not tolerate the material in either case and it was considered by the public to be offensive and disrespectful. Public perception and opinion of a case is important in these cases and the public is being affected by the material involved. Although not everyone was directly given a flyer in the Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott [2013] case, the entire LGBTQ community would be affected as it changes the attitudes and perceptions people have towards one particular group of people. Although a similar case, the outcome was quite different. Butler “was charged with 173 counts in the first indictment;” (R. v. Butler, 1992, p. 1) This included: possessing obscene material for the purpose of sale, possessing obscene material for the purpose of distribution and exposing obscene material to public view. Perhaps Butler had a harsher outcome than Whatcott due to the fact that a larger group of people was offended by his actions, or the time in which these cases …show more content…

Through the case of Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott [2013], the court was able to define hate speech and determined that the flyers William Whatcott created and distributed were not protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The information on the flyers were inaccurate, and caused both social and direct harm to the individuals it targeted. This case is similar in nature to the R v Butler [1992] case as it focuses on freedom of expression and involves material that the public found offensive. Although similar, we are able to see through the outcome how society has progressed and changed throughout the years. The pamphlets in Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott [2013] do not display the level of tolerance of diversity and acceptance that our society should strive to

Show More
Related
1582 Words | 7 Pages

Nabozny v. Podlesny (1996) was a case heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit regarding the protection of a school student in Ashland, Wisconsin, who had been harassed and bullied by classmates because of his sexual orientation. The plaintiff in the case—Jamie Nabozny—sought damages from school officials for their failure to protect him from the bullying. A jury found that this failure violated Nabozny's constitutional rights and awarded him $962,000 in damages.[1][2] Contents [hide] 1 Background 2 The case 3 Reception and significance 4 References 5 External links Background[edit] Jamie Nabozny (born October 1975) went to the local public middle school in the small Wisconsin town of Ashland, where his parents

Read More
1141 Words | 5 Pages

As the leader of the foundation, Greg Lukianoff has witnessed and fought many legal occasions of trigger warnings and microaggressions resulting in the masking of the freedom of speech. Coauthor Jonathan Haidt is a professor at New York University’s

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

In her article, “Censorship 101,” West crafts her text through numerous court case experience and skill in rhetorical devices as her background expertise is used to her advantage. Sonja West begins her argument with the use of exemplification in a previous court case. The scene is set in 1962, and West garments the introduction with excessive details and biased language as readers quickly root for the victory of the Tinker case and share the celebratory state of their

Read More
103 Words | 1 Pages

People have the tendency to take the First Amendment for granted, but some tend to use it to their favor. Stanley Fish presents his main argument about how people misuse this amendment for all their conflicts involving from racial issues to current political affairs in his article, Free-Speech Follies. His article involves those who misinterpret the First Amendment as their own works or constantly use it as an excuse to express their attitudes and desires about a certain subject matter. He expresses his personal opinions against those who consistently use the First Amendment as a weapon to defend themselves from harm of criticism.

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

In Derek Bok’s, Protecting Freedom of Expression On The Campus, he brings light to the issue of censorship in universities. He states that students at Harvard University got offended after a few students displayed the confederate flag. There have been many cases in which people have tried to censor offensive material however; the Supreme Court preferred to conserve the freedom of expression. He believes that if censorship starts to take place, it will be difficult to know when to cross the line. In addition, it will not fix the initial problem since the offenders will continue to abuse others using different means.

Read More
61 Words | 1 Pages

The Bethel School District had suspended the respondent, Matthew N. Fraser for the span of three school days as well as the school decided to revoke his name from a roster of potential speaking at special ceremonies such as graduation. The respondent’s parent reciprocated action by bringing their child’s infraction of his first Amendment right. This includes his freedom of speech.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

First Amendment rights are guaranteed to all American citizens, but current free speech issues are testing Constitutional boundaries. Where must the line be drawn between free speech and infringement upon others’ rights? Is there some speech so cruel and so appalling that it does not merit protection? These issues have been raised by the recent activities of the Westboro Baptist Church. Based out of Topeka, Kansas[1], this small group of radicals is marked by their hateful views and their contempt for homosexuality. The Westboro Baptist Church has gained notoriety and sparked national outrage with their offensive acts, particularly by protesting the funerals of fallen soldiers.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

Ellie Reynolds advances a rhetorically effective argument on why government should not have regulatory control over offensive Native American mascots in schools across the country. She believes this control is more of a detriment to society than a service. Her article published on the DenverPost.com, “Native Americans Have Become a Political Pawn,” offers a compelling point of view on this controversial issue because Reynolds is a member of the Oglala Sioux tribe herself (Reynolds 659). Along with her strong view against government involvement on this issue, which she considers censorship by political correctness, Reynolds uses her personal experience, historical context, and the negative effects of political correctness to convey her effective

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution Act of 1982 was imperative in addressing the above concerns with the Canadian Bill of Rights, since it is a part of the constitution that provides solid, expansive grounds to the protection of individual rights. This was received with both excitement and trepidation. According to the Constitution Act of 1982, our Charter of Rights and

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

This case clashes with freedom of speech, but it is also about freedom to

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

A speech code is any university policy that forbids the use of hateful or contemptuous expressions towards any social group, particularly those categorized based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, etc. In this essay, I will explain why such regulations are justifiable for the reasons that Charles R. Lawrence Ⅲ states in Racist Speech as the Functional Equivalent of Fighting Words. He argues that speech codes “[do] nothing more than prohibit intentional face-to-face insults”(pg 175), and that “racial insults are undeserving of First Amendment protection because the perpetrator’s intention is not to discover truth or initiate dialogue, but to injure the victim.”(pg 175) A prime reason for many universities

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article discusses how these are not crimes that are being committed, rather, these are crimes that are only being discussed. This raises the question of whether or not the United States is overcriminilizing speech. The article argues that in order for these crimes to seriously be considered as a criminal offense, the government needs to create an objective way of qualifying what is and

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

How The Holocaust Affected Countries Countries have responded to one of the greatest mass killings in the world in many different ways. The Holocaust was a genocide that caused the deaths of over 11 million people, including 6 million Jews. This is something that everyone should be informed on regardless of where they live because the Holocaust left an impact on the world forever. The United States and Canada have been shaped positively over the years because they have allowed Holocaust survivors to immigrate there, anti-Semitism has decreased, and multiple programs have been launched to learn more about the Holocaust.

Read More
1460 Words | 6 Pages

The University of Winnipeg has approved a requirement that all undergraduate students complete one Indigenous studies course in order to graduate, which has left some asking whether the University of Manitoba should do the same. The goal of the requirement at the University of Winnipeg is to develop “mutual respect and understanding” (Narine, 2015) between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people. The approval came following an article in Maclean’s magazine stating that Winnipeg is where the country’s racism problem is at its worst (Macdonald, 2015) due to the preventable 2008 death of Brian Sinclair, who was left to wait for treatment in a Winnipeg emergency room for 34 hours, and was sparked by the 2014 death of 15-year-old Tina Fontaine, one

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

On the sidewalks of Rochester in the year 1942, Walter Chaplinsky was arrested for repeating ' You are a God damned racketeer' and 'a damned Fascist’ to a police officer. Chaplinsky’s statements violated a New Hampshire law prohibiting offensive, derisive, or annoying words or sounds said unto an individual or party in a public place. He appealed the decision of the District Court, and when it came to the Supreme Court, they came to a profound decision. Supreme Court Justice Murphy said there are certain words that could reasonably result in a fight or a breach of peace when uttered.

Read More

More about The Importance Of Hate Speech In Canada

Related Topics

Open Document