In her essay titled “Is ‘Screen Time’ Dangerous for Children?” Alison Gopnik addresses many parents’ concerns about how modern technology affects children. She combats their apprehension through her own personal anecdotes and a light, humorous tone. She starts off her argument with a touching short story involving her grandson, Augie, and her learning about how bees make honey. By telling the story in first person perspective, she not only connects with the reader, but she also establishes her credibility on the topic—since this event happened to her, she is in turn very knowledgeable about how it occured.
Children who grow up in poverty are faced with a series of issues which impact their education and social atmosphere. In both the school and home setting these children lack the proper resources which they need to succeed academically. Across the country, people have begun creating programs which aim to help children in poverty succeed, despite their socioeconomic status. These programs range from after-school reading, tutoring services, charter schools, and free summer programs. All of these programs provide children with extra academic help which they may not be receiving in school or at home.
Instead a program should be created to help students change their ways and their knowledge to it’s full
Lauren Hale, professor in the department of family, population, and preventative health at Stony Brook University, collaborated with her team at Stony Brook University to study the effects of screen time in children. This study focused on exploring the differences between passive and interactive screen time. However, the study showed no significant differences between the effects of interactive versus passive screen time. Thus, the article concludes that all forms of screen time should be limited. This article will be helpful in supporting the thesis, because it denies one of the common fallacies that screen time can be categorized into positive and negative types of screen time, arguing instead that all forms of screen time should be limited and treated with caution.
The advanced technology in the home is to blame for the parent’s deaths because the technology was addicting and dangerous. In “The Veldt” by Ray Bradbury, George and Lydia decide to buy a house with advanced technology. Their kids, Wendy and Peter play in a virtual reality room called the nursery. One day, the parents notice that the kids were playing with lions in the nursery. They decide that playing with lions can be dangerous and come to the conclusion that they need a break from the technology.
This is also a great benefit for them, because the school can provide that for them. Not to mention teachers and staff too. Better literacy materials and technology for the teachers can give a better learning experience for the
Screen limitations should be set for children. They are spending more and more time in front of a screen instead of face to face with other people. Children are having a hard time completing simple tasks given. Spending several hours in front of a screen lowers a childs' abiltity to pay attention. As a result they have less communication skills and have hard times holding a conversation with an adult.
AAP is the Pediatrics Official Journal Of The American Academy Of Pediatrics, When a new AAP article is made, the facts/statements in the article are agreed among all pediatricians and doctors in the subject. AAP states “Limit the amount of total entertainment screen time to <1 to 2 hours per day” (AAP) which is pretty reasonable screen time not including homework, throughout the years of iPad and iPhone and things, more and more people are getting these devices so more and more people have everyday screen time and most are 2 hours and above. Even though the internet can give you good effects but I can give you really bad effects as well. The internet can affect our health, and even affect the development of your brain and eyes.
Does anyone else think that life would be easier if phone screen time and just phones in general were limited? Phones these past years have been getting better and better, but in reality they are getting worse and worse. It’s getting worse for so many reasons, so therefore phones screen time should be limited. This much phone time is really affecting you physically. Also we are being affected in the health area too.
The screen time of your children might be scaring and frustrating you, but if this is the case of a good parenting you can convert this annoying screen time into a positive one. Although the digital devices might consist of many dangers or risks in the present era but on
Should Online Time be Limited for Teens? Teenagers are spending so many hours a week online, it is affecting us in multiple ways. It results in us getting less of things we need most. There can be deeper problems within us by using too much social media. Lastly we do not know how to manage our time we spent too much time on social media.
As a person who has grown up watching tv, playing video games, and also enjoying the outdoors i can understand both sides of this arguement. However, i agree more with the second passage in the sense that screen time isnt the main cause of the issues these people have. Now-a-days everyone is linked into some type of technology whether it be a smartphone, laptop, or videogame. In addition, as a person who excels better with a visual or physical example rather than reading text from a book, I see technology as a way to better learn new things. Screen time isn't the issue, I feel it's more how you choose to use it.
Screen time should be limited to two hours because screen time creates distractions and can foster negative behaviors. Screen time creates distractions in many ways. Screen time has been dragging us away from conversations. According to Connected but Alone by Sherry Turkles she states, “We sacrifice conversations for more connections.” This shows how technology can distract adolescents and not be able to develop face to face conversations.
I do not believe there is one answer to whether or not parents should limit their children’s time on the computer. There are many factors that can influence whether children should or shouldn’t be regulated, but the main ones are age, maturity, and social circles. I think that as children get older, they require less and less regulation and supervision from parents (in most circumstances). This is a generally accepted opinion, so it makes sense to also apply it to computers as well. Specifically, children should be heavily regulated in their screen time, teens less so but still monitored, and young adults little to no regulation.
Today, technology and interactive media have become a magic to make education for children more fascinating and fun. What is technology and interactive media? National Association for the Education of Young Children (2012), says that technology refers to a broad range of digital devices and interactive media refers to digital and analog materials. Some examples of technology are computers, tablets, multitouch screens, interactive whiteboards, mobile devices, cameras, audio recorders, electronic toys, games and e-book readers. Some examples of interactive media are software programs, applications (apps) and the Internet.
