ipl-logo

Rome: Did Romans Meet The Common Good

1445 Words6 Pages

Introduction Are the Romans meeting the common good? Common good is when everything is fair to everyone. They could either meet the common good, somewhat meet the common good, or not meet the common good. Lets see if the Romans did a good job meeting the common good. Promoting The Rule Of Law When it comes to promoting the rule of law, the Roman Republic should have worked harder. The grade that they deserve is a C. That is not a very good grade. The way that they set up their rules and laws were not fair to everyone. Most of the free men had a lot of rights, but slaves and women didn't have very many. Women, slaves, or non-citizens could not vote. Women also weren't allowed to plead in court.--But everyone else could! Now …show more content…

Women weren't allowed to do many jobs and weren't capable of doing many jobs so that wasn't really fair to them. Most people had slaves, and most people were farmers. This means there was a lot of slaves in Rome! Anyway, they grew an assortment of grains, olives, and grapes, and many other things. They didn't just grow these things to eat, they also grew them to trade with other people for different things. You see, they love to trade and traded all the time. Not just farmers traded, everyone traded. They were even willing to sail overseas to trade with people from North Africa, Spain, and many other far away places. The Romans traded a lot because their greatest concern was that they wouldn't have enough food to feed everybody. But everything turned out to be well. With too much food, and not enough money, the government had decided that it would be OK if the Romans paid ½ of their taxes in money and the other ½ in food. This actually helped because not as many people went to jail for not paying their taxes, and it also created a lot of food storage for the colder seasons when they couldn't grow as many crops. Supporting the economic system isn't just based on farming and trading. Jobs, and money also tie into supporting the economic system. For example, many rich people made businesses making clothes and tools in factories. But since most people …show more content…

One of the reasons (a quite good one) why they have earned an A on this topic is because they have created an aqueduct system. The aqueduct system is a waterway that flows the water easier, faster, and cleaner. After they built the waterway, everybody stopped getting sick as often because they were drinking cleaner water. As you can see, this was a very move. Good Job! In order for the water to get to Rome, they had to connect pipes underground to have a steady flow of water without ruining anything above ground. The pipes went through highlands, and valleys. Did you know that in Rome, more water flows per person than in New York today! Thanks to the smart brains of the Ancient Romans! Anyhow, after the Roman army won the war, they decided to build bridges, roads, and other helpful transportation devices. There once was a saying that Every road leads to Rome.” I am not quite sure what that means, but it sounds like a good

Show More
Related
418 Words | 2 Pages

The economy of Rome was failing because trade and business had begun to fade. As stated in document 1 “Commerce had largely disappeared owing to the lack of customers, to piracy on the seas, and to insecurity of the roads on land.” Due to the lack of customers and the dangers of the road and the sea, there

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

So the invaders can easily attack Rome without dying. The Romans were also getting lazier so they didn't protect their city.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

One of the main reasons that caused the Roman empire’s downfall was due to their financial strains. This can be shown in the text where it says, “There was a noticeable decline in trade and small industry, and the labor shortage caused by the plague affected both military recruiting and the economy. Armies were needed more than ever, but financial strains made it difficult to pay and enlist more soldiers. By the mid-third century, the state had to hire Germans to fight under Roman commanders.” (Document 1).

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

The Roman empire was based on slavery: slavery on a massive scale. Therefore The success and spoils of Roman wars meant that slaves were everywhere putting regular Roman citizens out of work. This solution was not ideal but no rich Romans (patricians) seemed willing to compromise and give up their slaves. Attempts were made to base taxes on the numbers of slaves owned but the rich simply freed their slaves to avoid taxation and then added on still to the numbers of unemployed.

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

Rome’s dominance of the Mediterranean lead to efficient and highly beneficial trade amongst Romans and surrounding countries. Finally, the Romans had one designated money system in which their entire empire used. The Roman coin represents intelligence, organization, unity, and the importance trade obtained in the Roman empire. The Romans traded with coins and all came together under one

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

The death of the sow in the Lord of the Flies is very similar to the death of the Apatosaurus herd in Jurassic World. In the movie, the Apatosaurus herd dies slow and inhumane deaths just like the sow in the book. As shown in the example, both Jack and the Indominus Rex were not killing to eat, but were killing for the fun of it. This can be concluded when Jack tries to stab the sow whenever he is given the opportunity whereas the Indominus Rex just leaves the Apatosaurs to die. When Jack and his tribe killed the sow, they were ecstatic and proud.

Read More
368 Words | 2 Pages

Romans grew wheat, barley, olives, grapes, apples, pears, figs onions, and celery. They also traded those for items. There were also other ways to make money and get items in Rome.

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

First, the amount of casualties in numerous wars, such as the Punic Wars in which 300,000 were estimated to have died, negatively impacted the number of Roman farmers. The farmers were known as the backbone of Rome at the time. Land reforms called latifundias started developing. These estates would buy out small farms and turn the free workers into slaves. These reforms became really popular because they

Read More
1097 Words | 5 Pages

This met the common good, because all the people of Rome could get clean after a hard day in the fields. The Romans also provided public services, because they had the aqueducts to deliver water from reservoirs, to the public baths, public fountains, and private villas. When the Romans provided public services, I believe that they met the common good, so I would give this an easy A. I believe that the Romans met the common good, when preparing a common defense. The Romans developed an army during the republic, and the army was used in times of trouble. Later, a permanent one was made.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

A decrease of working farmers forced government subsidization, which then caused a big blow to the Roman economy. The last reason for the ruination of the economic side of the Empire was the costs of military funding and the effects of trading. The spread of pacifistic beliefs throughout the Empire led to a decrease in the amount of willing legionnaires, pressuring the government to allow barbarian tribes to work for their military. As the two sides of the Empire drifted apart, they started to fight over valuable resources and made enemies with each other. The failing economy of the Roman Empire eventually grew to be the most significant cause of its monumental disintegration.

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

For example, if an invasion was occurring in Egypt. But the bulk of their armies were stationed in the city of Rome the general could load them into ships and send them by sea which is much faster than traveling by foot which any land-locked countries like Mongolia would have to do. Fully surrounding the Meditteranean was also very useful in creating trade routes between major cities throughout the empire. Eventually, the empire grew so big that it had to be split in two, the Western Roman Empire being controlled by Rome, and the Eastern by Constantinople.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

Democracy in Ancient Rome Ancient Rome is often portrayed as a highly democratic society for the ancient world. After all, the United States’ government is modeled after some parts of the Roman’s structure of government. But,was Rome as democratic as is is commonly thought to be? Contrary to what people may think Rome’s democracy wasn't exactly so democratic for all of its citizens. One example of Rome’s confusing concept of democracy can be found in The Histories, which was written by the Greek historian Polybius in 119 BCE.

Read More
1487 Words | 6 Pages

In Ancient Rome, slavery was an integral part of the Roman society and economy. Slaves were either conquered or purchased, and their various skills and labors greatly contributed to Rome’s success. Romans arguably invested so much energy into slave labor that they failed to nurture innovation. Slaves made up roughly 10- 15% of the Roman population.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

I don’t think Rome would have reached the level of success she did without their aid, the provinces enriched her with wealth. art, culture and trade. It seems to me that the Roman empire operated like an international trade organisation, however, with much easier access because she governed all of the provinces. References Ancient Roman Economy.

Read More

More about Rome: Did Romans Meet The Common Good

Related Topics

Open Document