ipl-logo

The Iran-Contra Affair: A Political Scandal In The Late 1980s

1383 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Economic policy changes by reagan

The Iran-Contra affair was a political scandal that rocked the United States in the late 1980s. It involved a secret and illegal scheme by the Reagan administration to sell weapons to Iran, which was under an arms embargo, and use the proceeds to fund the Contras, a rebel group fighting against the socialist government of Nicaragua. The affair exposed the abuse of power and the deception of the executive branch, and raised serious questions about the role of Congress and the public in overseeing foreign policy. The background of the affair can be traced back to two major events in the early 1980s: the Iranian Revolution and the Nicaraguan Revolution. In 1979, a popular uprising overthrew the pro-Western Shah of Iran and established an Islamic …show more content…

Congress launched several investigations into the affair, as did an independent counsel appointed by a special court. The investigations revealed that the affair involved a web of lies, cover-ups, illegal activities, and constitutional violations by various members of the Reagan administration. They also exposed the flaws and loopholes in the system of checks and balances that was supposed to prevent such abuses of power. The investigations resulted in several indictments and convictions of some of the key players in the affair, such as North, Poindexter, Secord, Hakim, and others. However, most of them were later pardoned by President George H.W. Bush in 1992. Reagan himself was never formally charged with any wrongdoing, but his reputation and credibility were severely damaged by the scandal. He apologized to the American people for his mistakes and accepted full responsibility for his actions. The Iran-Contra affair was one of the most controversial and complex scandals in American history. It raised important questions about the role and limits of presidential power, congressional oversight, public accountability, foreign policy objectives, national security interests, human rights principles, and moral values. It also demonstrated how secrecy and deception can undermine democracy and erode trust between leaders and

Show More
Related
479 Words | 2 Pages

In 1980, the Shah died and the militants wanted the hostage deal of Shah standing trial and taking the punishment for his crimes in exchange for the release of the hostages. So now with the Shah passing it was impossible for the Shah to stand trial and be convicted for the said crimes. Leaving the hostages useless to the militants. So its time for a new deal to be made. In exchange for the hostages, the United States would unfreeze the accounts of the Iranian

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

The Watergate Scandal eventually led to President Nixon’s resignation from office. Before his re-election, a group aptly coined CREEP, illegally broke into the Democratic National Committee office to steal information to use in the upcoming election. Nixon tried to cover up the incident by denying his involvement in the crime. His top aides, including his Vice President Spiro Agnew, resigned to avoid giving anything away that would connect Nixon to the Watergate Scandal. The only piece of evidence seemed to be Nixon’s recordings of all conversations had by him in the White House; however, Nixon refused to give up the tapes, claiming Executive Privilege.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

Gary Webb, the CIA, the Contra war, and the United States government involvement in the trafficking and smuggling of cocaine in and out of Central America until this day, still remains highly controversial. This was an event that had been going on for quite some time which no one had any idea at all that it was happening. However, until finally a news reporter from the San Jose Mercury News stumbles upon this controversial and problematic story, strictly by coincidence. The involvement of the CIA in trafficking drugs in Nicaragua was to simply fund the Contra war in Nicaragua during the Ronald Reagan administration. The Ronald Reagan administration was formulated under the theory of saying no to drugs and they were against it entirely.

Read More
1925 Words | 8 Pages

There are so many unanswered questions left-over from this scandal that it really makes it hard to say that it was resolved and even harder to decide whether or not it was resolved in a positive or negative manner. This is also not to say that there weren’t ways in which the crisis was resolved in positive ways. The more positive ways that this predicament was resolved in are still able to be seen today as after all of this happened Congress passed various laws in regards to government ethics, campaign financing, and freedom of information. Although there were many, many

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

Ronald Reagan would win the election of 1980 and one of his major campaign platforms was the promise to end the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The Ayatollah’s supporters were then elected to the Iranian parliament. This meant that there was no reason to hold the hostages, having the Ayatollah in power with his supports in parliament meant that they effectively controlled all aspects of Iranian society. Then Iraq and Iran would become involved in a war. Iranian assets which had been frozen in the United States, were now needed more than ever if they wished to have access to their foreign currencies, without which they risked losing the war and then their country.

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

Over the years, the United States government has been obligated to face different scandals, some of which have raised concerns as to whether or not government is in fact working in the interest of the people and being respectful of the rights and sovereignty of other nations around the world. Two scandals that shook the foundations of Washington to its core were Watergate and the Iran-Contra Scandal. Looking into the specifics of the methods, i.e. the illegal actions and deceptions, which government officials used in each case to further their agendas, it is possible to see that there was a marked difference. The similarity between both cases, however, was that Congress was deliberately deceived and circumvented by an executive branch that

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

Conclusion Sixty-nine political aides from President Nixon’s administration were charged with federal crimes such as obstruction of justice and abuse of power, just to name a few. Forty-eight of these individuals were found guilty. It was not until Gerald Ford was sworn in as the 38th President of the United States that Richard Nixon was granted a “full, free and absolute pardon” (The Washington Post) for any and all of his crimes that violated the Constitution of America. This granted pardon was the most controversial component of the Watergate scandal.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

Watergate, Clinton’s Impeachment, and the Iran-Contra Scandals all could have been avoided if people had just told the truth. This is an all-around good rule to follow. No one is above the law, especially the president. Watergate, Clinton’s Impeachment, and the Iran-Contra Scandals were all caused by the illegal actions of the president and members of his staff.

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

Watergate Scandal” A scandal erupted during Nixon's Presidency known as the Watergate, Nixon Scandal. To attain information about the Democratic Party's campaign plans for the next term, Nixon had sent plumbers to insert bugs in the Democratic National Committee headquarters, which would end up causing a scandal that would affect the American public. At first, Nixon refused to give in tapes of his conversations, but printed versions of the rephrased tapes were later disclosed by Nixon, although filled with deceptions. Important evidence was found after the Supreme Court said that Nixon must surrender his genuine tapes.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

Ronald Reagan could have definitely been impeached by the standards used on the governors governors (malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance) mainly because of the many things that he had done during his presidency. There were were reports from Beirut that the Reagan administration approached Iran with an arms for hostage deal but President Ronald Reagan denied it. Days later he did admit that arms had been shipped to Iran to forge a better relationship but denied they were arms for hostages. He negotiated with terrosists!If that does not scream impeachment then I do not know what does.

Read More
1856 Words | 8 Pages

Regarding the former, a popular misconception is that the president “can achieve any political or policy objective if only he tries hard enough or uses the right tactics,” a belief known as the Green Lantern Theory of politics. By the Founding Fathers’ design, the “[p]resident has little formal power to make Congress do anything”—a “combination of public speeches and private wheedling” is not enough to force Congressional action. This is further complicated by elections’ incentives structures. “When the president takes a position on an issue[,] the opposing party becomes far more likely to take the opposite position” because “elections are zero-sum affairs.” Cooperating with the President’s platform translates into an appearance that the president is successful.

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout American history, there have been many different political scandals that have caused political distrust and reform. Two notable examples are the Watergate scandal and the Whiskey Ring Scandal. The Watergate scandal occurred on June 17, 1972, when five men were arrested in the Watergate complex after they tried to bug the Democratic Party's headquarters electronically. This event was a significant political controversy from 1972 to 1974 during Richard Nixon's presidency, eventually leading to his resignation. There have been many different presidential political scandals that have affected their presidency.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Nicaragua and Iran were the two countries that came together and formed a scandal known as the Iran- Contra in the early 1980’s. But how did it all start? The group that started it is known as the Contras, that’s short for “counterrevolutionaries”. That is the label given to them as the terrorist rebel group that were effective from 1979 all the way to the early 1990’s. On the opposing side of the Contras, there was an antagonist group called the Sandinistas, a democratic socialist political party in Nicaragua.

Read More
2176 Words | 9 Pages

It is a new world, and we should help to shape it. It is a new world that calls for a new American foreign policy--a policy based on constant decency in its values and on optimism in our historical vision.” Carter began aiding counties to protect individuals from arbitrary powers by giving out money aid, and imposing economic sanctions on countries the violate human rights. However Carters foreign policy quickly changed with the 1997 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Which had been the most serious threat to peace since World War 2, and the 1980 Iranian hostage crisis 50 American hostages where taken by Iranian terrorist supporting Iran’s revolution that were protesting the admission of Shah into the United States for medical

Read More
1453 Words | 6 Pages

Left office on good terms with the people. Failures Iran-Contra Scandal Throughout Reagan’s Presidency he had a good attitude and set the prosperous tone of the country, but slipped up at the Iran-Contra Scandal. He wanted to bring back “the great, confident roar of American progress and growth and optimism.” This positive attitude that America was heading in the right direction was contagious, and Americans everywhere felt the same way. They trusted him, and backed up most of his decisions.

Read More

More about The Iran-Contra Affair: A Political Scandal In The Late 1980s

Related Topics

Open Document