ipl-logo

The Iran-Contra Affair By The Reagan Administration

1641 Words7 Pages

The deception and secrecy of the Iran-Contra affair by the Reagan Administration illustrated the hypocrisy in U.S. Foreign policy. Beginning in the early 1980’s, the Reagan Administration orchestrated an elaborate plan to illegally fund a right-wing militant group in Nicaragua. Also during this period, the U.S. was entangled in a hostage crisis in Lebanon. As a result, of these two issues, Reagan and his administration would set up secret relations with Iran. Iran was publicly seen as one of America’s biggest enemies, but privately Iran would become a key trading partner. The Iran-Contra affair was one of the biggest political scandals of the 20th century, the illicit deals made with the Iranians and various others involving arms, money, and …show more content…

The affair originated from the U.S.’s aim to overthrow a Socialist Government in Nicaragua. The U.S. planned to support a rebel group called the Contras who opposed the government. The Reagan Administration encountered a major problem in helping the Contras. Congress had made it nearly impossible for the United States to fund the Contras either militarily or financially due to the Boland Amendment. The Boland Amendment according to The New York Times stated, “No funds available to the CIA, the Department of Defense or any other agency of the U.S. involved in intelligence activities may be obligated for the purpose of supporting, directly or indirectly, military or paramilitary operations in Nicaragua by any nation, group, organization, movement, or individual” (New York Times, 1987). As a result of this amendment, the Reagan Administration needed to find other ways to support the …show more content…

needed a way to transfer the arms to Iran. So as a result, a plan was developed to send the arms via Israel to Iran. Israel and Iran have been bitter rivals since the birth of the Israeli state in 1948. Ultimately their rivalry was not a deal breaker and Israel went along as a middleman between the United States and Iran. According to The Secret War with Iran by Ronen Bergman, “Israel helped the United States by selling Iran $75 Million worth of Israeli military equipment including anti-tank guns, tank parts and aircraft parts” (Bergman, 2008). During a meeting on December 7th, 1985 a closed group of Presidential officials and cabinet members met with President Reagan to discuss the shipment of arms to Iran. Caspar Weinberger witnessed this as he wrote multiple notes that would be released to the National Security Archive. In these notes, Weinberger writes that “President Reagan would like to free the hostages and thinks the arms would help the moderate Iranian Army and could possibly overthrow the theocracy in Iran” ( Handwritten notes of meeting in White House Family Quarters, December 7, 1985). In the discussion, The President, George Shultz, Weinberger, and other top aides discussed the legality of selling arms to Iran via Israel. Schultz and Weinberger were against the operation of trading hostages for arms and saw it as illegal since the United States declared Iran as a sponsor of terrorism. As mentioned in the

Show More
Related
635 Words | 3 Pages

Domestically, Farber discusses the crisis in terms of the associations with Jimmy Carter and the dominating negative view Americans had on the political life in the United States during the hostage crisis. During this time Jimmy Carter was viewed very negatively because Carter and his administration did not resolve the crisis soon enough and let the situation linger on. Ultimately, the Iranian Hostage Crisis is what fated Carter’s presidency in Farber’s

Read More
1872 Words | 8 Pages

The role that Reagan’s actions played in ending the Cold War has been a controversial topic ever since the war came to a close. This investigation will show that, to a good extent, Reagan’s actions

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

President Reagan believed that by doing this it would benefit the economy by making it grow. This all transferred to his domestic policy which

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

William Hudson's book American Democracy in Peril, has given several challenges facing democracy in American. Hudson's seventh challenge to America's democracy is the national security state. Starts the chapter off talking about Ronald Reagan's administration and their involvement in Central America. He talks about two important people that were involved in it such as CIA director William Casey who created the contra to prevent the Saninistas from supplying the rebels in El Salvador. Hudson also talks the Oliver North and John Poindexter and the Iran-contra and how they with the support of Casey created a hidden government inside the government that used government resources to achieve their own political agenda (Hudson).

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

The first was the Iran hostage situation in 1979. The United States had long supported Shah Reza Pahlavi as the leader in Iran. However, an internal revolution by Islamic fundamentalists dethroned Pahlavi; eventually he sought asylum in the United States. That refuge came with a price, as several revolutionary Iranians claimed 66 American hostages at the United States embassy in Teheran. The Iranians demanded Pahlavi in return for the hostages.

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

Peter Schweizer’s chapter in Living in the Eighties he discusses the Iran-Contra scandal and how President Reagan’s policy was a “great success” (148), because his actions led to the eventual downfall of the Soviet Union. Schweizer sates that “The arms sales [the] Iranians demanded did not free the hostages but did generate secret profits that were funneled to the Nicaraguan contras to contravene congressional restrictions on American funding for the contras” (149) so even though America looked weak and Reagan was painted as contradictory there is no foul here because of success in the long run. If that was a sentiment actually echoed by Schewizer, Sean Wilentz would wholeheartedly disagree with Schweizer’s perception of the situation. In Wilentz’s book The Age of Reagan he dedicates an entire chapter

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

Ronald Reagan would win the election of 1980 and one of his major campaign platforms was the promise to end the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The Ayatollah’s supporters were then elected to the Iranian parliament. This meant that there was no reason to hold the hostages, having the Ayatollah in power with his supports in parliament meant that they effectively controlled all aspects of Iranian society. Then Iraq and Iran would become involved in a war. Iranian assets which had been frozen in the United States, were now needed more than ever if they wished to have access to their foreign currencies, without which they risked losing the war and then their country.

Read More
1841 Words | 8 Pages

Although Clancy does not mention his name, the president, takes strict positions against the Russians when addressing the Soviet Ambassador. Especially when the U.S. discovers a Soviet submarine extremely close to its shores, a violation of a stated agreement (Clancy 537). This fearlessness in regarding the Soviets comes from the increased freedom to do so. In conjunction, this drives powerful parallels between Clancy’s U.S. and the Reagan Administration. As regarded in the article Tom Clancy: “[T]he novel [Hunt for Red October] captured the spirit of the Cold War politics typical of the administration of President Ronald Reagan” (“Tom Clancy” 308).

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Ronald Reagan's presidency almost seems trivial as Wiesel suggests that it is his moral judgement defining this issue. Being president, it is expected of him to make sound, political decisions; it would be political suicide, however, to engage in war. Wiesel

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

At the same time, Reagan was deeply worried about the accepted national policy that had come out since the Soviets acquired atomic weapons of "mutual assured destruction. " This said that the Soviet Union and United Sates would not attack each other out of fear. This, said Reagan, was "a truly mad policy." He believed that it was wrong to destroy the civilian population of another country in an attack.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

At the time, Ronald Reagan was president. He saw the Contras as anti-communists and wanted to find a way to support them. Reagan funded the Contras in Nicaragua because they were fighting a government that was immensely shaped by the communists. Reagan’s beliefs came from the Reagan Doctrine, which explains that it’s a strategy that is believed that is you support

Read More
1896 Words | 8 Pages

This essay first evaluates Reagan’s disposition, character and personal philosophy to establish whether or not his character was consistent with that of a neo-conservative. It then examines the extent to which the neo-conservatives around him influenced his foreign policy, particularly during the Cold War. Lastly, it applies the ‘pragmatic libertarian’ label to discover its relevance in comparison to neo-conservatism. Reagan was not the ‘hawk’ that he has been eagerly portrayed to be by contemporary neo-conservatives. There is a distinction to be made between Ronald Reagan’s character and the application of a neo-conservatism label to his foreign policy (Husan, 2011; Thompson, 2011) and a disparity between theory and action practise (Halper

Read More
2176 Words | 9 Pages

It is a new world, and we should help to shape it. It is a new world that calls for a new American foreign policy--a policy based on constant decency in its values and on optimism in our historical vision.” Carter began aiding counties to protect individuals from arbitrary powers by giving out money aid, and imposing economic sanctions on countries the violate human rights. However Carters foreign policy quickly changed with the 1997 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Which had been the most serious threat to peace since World War 2, and the 1980 Iranian hostage crisis 50 American hostages where taken by Iranian terrorist supporting Iran’s revolution that were protesting the admission of Shah into the United States for medical

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

The Watergate Scandal and Impeachment of Richard Nixon Scandals throughout history have had an increased effect on our society. Thousands of people have been caught in their own. Scandals can most accurately be described as a situation or issue that causes great public outrage or interest. It is mostly that of one that is illegal or wrong by moral standards. One of the most well known scandals, is the Watergate scandal, which affected dozens of Americans.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

The rapid growth in developing countries like Ghana is mostly accompanied by the expansion of health facilities with critical care units (CCUs) being in focus. The expansion of the critical care services is often faced with challenges in expertise in critical care nursing. Newman 2003, stated that the experience of critical care nursing cannot be separated from the world in which they thrive. Thus, being up to the task of delivering optimal care should be coupled with expanding our knowledge in the critical care nursing.

Read More

More about The Iran-Contra Affair By The Reagan Administration

Related Topics

Open Document