ipl-logo

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Elie Wiesel

787 Words4 Pages

Elie Wiesel strives for peace in a tormented world and atonement for human dignity as he implores Ronald Reagan to reconsider his decision to visit a Bitburg cemetery, a site where graves of Hitler's Waffen SS were found. Wiesel, Jewish political activist and Holocaust witness, begins his address to President Reagan by setting his medal as a symbol inclusive of “all those who remember what SS killers have done”. Using an anecdote of his own personal experience, and a rhetorical question, Wiesel uses humour and an understatement to claim he learned “small things” over the last forty years; however, “the perils of language and those of silence” are anything but. This emphasizes the magnitude of their importance. His deliberate diction is evident …show more content…

Wiesel does not simply request or ask Reagan not to go (diction), but rather he implores, he begs the President not to associate with the Waffen SS; "[his] place is with the victims of the SS". Although there are "political and strategic reasons" to justify Reagan's decision or, rather, indecision, the matter of millions of Jews being tortured and slaughtered transcends politics and calls into question the morals of nations (concession/refutation). It is not a war simply of countries against countries; it is a challenge of morals. Initially, Reagan was unaware of the SS graves, but now that is he aware, this issue is no longer a matter of political relations; his decisions are predicated on morality, the judgement of right and wrong. Should Reagan continue his insensitive actions with his new-found knowledge of the "terror, fear, isolation, torture, [and] gas chambers" (exemplification/catalogue), he would deserve no forgiveness, "for [he] knew what [he] did" – a parallel to Abe Rosenthal's ironic twist of Jesus' last words on forgiveness. Ronald Reagan's presidency almost seems trivial as Wiesel suggests that it is his moral judgement defining this issue. Being president, it is expected of him to make sound, political decisions; it would be political suicide, however, to engage in war. Wiesel

Show More
Related

Summary Of Figurative Language In Night By Elie Wiesel

186 Words | 1 Pages

In pages eight-five to one hundred-three, several events happened. There was another selection. This time, Eliezer and his father were split up, Eliezer in the healthy line, and Father in the not healthy line. Luckily, Eliezer case enough comotion to get Father to his line. After this, all of the healthy people were put into cattle cars with no roof.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis For Night By Elie Wiesel

686 Words | 3 Pages

Hannah Noel Mrs. Beaupre English 1 Honors 23 September 2016 Dialecticals 3-4 One passage that I think is interesting is, “No. Two steps from the pit we were ordered to turn to the left and made to go into the barracks” (Wiesel 25). With this quote the first thing that popped into my head was that these officers were petrifying the prisoners and making them think they were going to die and then at the last second turn them around. The fact that they did that is barbaric.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech

646 Words | 3 Pages

In 1945, Wiesel’s family was deported to an Auschwitz extermination camp for slave labor. Wiesel’s speech was set in the white house as part of the new millennium lecture. He starts off by directing his speech to the President, Mrs. Clinton, the members of congress, Ambassador of Holbrook, and excellences. However, the speech was intended to educate any listeners or readers about the perils of indifference.

Read More

A God Who Remember By Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Analysis

867 Words | 4 Pages

Elie Wiesel is a Holocaust survivor who strongly believes that people need to share their stories about the Holocaust with others. Elie Wiesel was in concentration camps for about half of his teen years along with his father. After being the only member of his family to survive the Holocaust he resolved to make what really happened more well-known. Elie Wiesel wrote dozens of books and submitted an essay titled “A God Who Remembers” to the book This I Believe. The essay focused on Elie Wiesel’s belief that those who have survived the Holocaust should not suppress their experiences but must share them so history will not repeat itself.

Read More

Elie Wiesel Encountered Many Forms Of Nonfiction

549 Words | 3 Pages

The purpose in Elie Wiesel’s acceptance speech is to tell the people that they must not forget the atrocities of the holocaust, lest we repeat them. This is revealed when he remarks: “And I tell him that I have tried. That I have tried to keep the memory alive, that I have tried to fight those who would forget. Because if we forget, we are guilty, we are accomplices.” 5.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Night By Elie Wiesel

439 Words | 2 Pages

Finally, the author expresses the dangers in ignorance and forgetfulness, “Because if we forget who the guilty are, we are accomplices” (Wiesel). He also conveys how if we forget the guilty, we do not care about what crimes they put forth. We cannot be ignorant to the oppressors, for the effect is the same as to side with them. In conclusion, Elie Wiesel persuades the audience and expresses his bias on neutrality during World War II by using his authority and personal

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Night By Elie Wiesel

759 Words | 4 Pages

Kamalpreet Kaur 10/25/2015 2nd period English 11 Final Draft Essay Night by Elie Wiesel is a Holocaust memoir about his experience with his father in the Nazi German concentration camps in Auschwitz and Buchenwald in 1944–1945. Elie Wiesel was born in Sighet, Transylvania on September 30th, 1928. On December 10, 1986, in the Oslo City Hall, Norway, Elie Wiesel delivered The Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech. Elie Wiesel is a messenger to a variety of mankind survivors from The Holocaust talked about their experiences in the camps and their struggle with faith through the

Read More

Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis

609 Words | 3 Pages

In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.

Read More

Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech By Elie Wiesel

494 Words | 2 Pages

Building Up The Main Point Elie Wiesel’s Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech shows and involves many gratitudes towards the people in his life. He, being a proud Jew, receives this award because he has continued to show peace, and believe in peace, after the fact that he was humiliated during the Holocaust. His speech includes the struggles he faced throughout his life and how grateful he is for the honor of accepting the Nobel Peace Prize; although, he believes he does not deserve it. Throughout the speech he adds many rhetorical devices that build on and add to the main point. He also chooses a specific text structure, and word choices, that make the conclusion of the speech more dramatic and effective.

Read More

What Are The Victims Of Injustice In Elie Wiesel's Speech

729 Words | 3 Pages

On April 12th, 1999, a Holocaust survivor by the name of Elie Wiesel spoke at the White House in Washington, D.C., showing gratitude to the Clintons for taking action against tragedies which plagued the world at that time (American Rhetoric). Without detailing his own gruesome experience within concentration camps, Wiesel uses his familiarity with suffering to relate to lesser-known injustice within the world. Additionally, he thanks Hillary Clinton for her actions of making the issues of smaller countries visible (Wiesel) and contrasts her against President Roosevelt, who turned a blind eye to the ethnic cleansing of Jews in Germany during World War II. Because Roosevelt was a well-liked president, his controversial activity further exemplifies Mrs. Clinton’s actions of speaking on behalf of “the victims of injustice” (Wiesel). Wiesel’s speech is named for his analyzation of administrations’ indifference to suffering of

Read More

'The Perils Of Indifference' By Elie Wiesel

1129 Words | 5 Pages

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Read More

Hope Despair And Memory By Elie Wiesel Analysis

714 Words | 3 Pages

Memory Blessing or Curse Religious wars fought over beliefs were always fought between two sides and one is thought to have a winner and a loser victor and victim. In Elie Wiesel’s Noble speech “Hope, Despair, and Memory” he describes his experiences during a religious war that were more of an overpowering of people than a war no clash of metal, no hard fought fight, just the rounding up and killing of people with different beliefs that barely put up a fight. Elie Wiesel the author of the Noble lecture “Hope, Despair, and Memory” implores us to respond to the human suffering and injustice that happened in the concentration camps by remembering the past, so that the past cannot taint the future through his point of view, cultural experiences, as well as his use of rhetorical appeals. Wiesel uses his cultural experiences and point of view sot that he could prove he spent time and survived the concentration camps in order to communicate that the past must be remembered that way it cannot destroy the future, he spent time in a concentration camps and he

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Jamila Lyiscott

553 Words | 3 Pages

The United States is made up of some of the most diverse and interesting cultures in the world. Jamila Lyiscott proves this by showing her different dialects and how they are all equally important. Lyiscott believes that the way she speaks towards her parents, towards her friends, and towards her colleagues are all one in the same.  Throughout the entirety of her speech, Lyiscott changes up her vocal patterns and dialects so that the audience can understand first hand what each of these dialects are. When she talks about her father, Lyiscott uses her native tongue, when she talks to her fellow neighbors and close friends she switches it up to a more urbanized dialect, and when she is in school she masks the other two dialects with a professional sounding language.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech

552 Words | 3 Pages

Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices In Elie Wiesel's Speech

806 Words | 4 Pages

Elie Wiesel voiced his emotions and thoughts of the horrors done to Jewish people during World War II whilst developing his claim. Wiesel “remember[s] his bewilderment,” “his astonishment,” and “his anguish” when he saw they were dropped into the ghetto to become slaves and to be slaughtered. He repeats the words “I remember” because he and the world, especially those who suffered in the ghettos and camps, would never be able to forget how innocent suffered. Consequently, he emphasized that “no one” has the right to advocate for the dead. Like many other people in the world, he lost his family during the war.

Read More

More about A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Elie Wiesel

Related Topics

Open Document