Recommended: Lobbying in government
This is a follow-up email in reference to Sandra Anacker 's application for AARP Medicare Supplement. In review of the application questions answered on page 5 are indicating currently receiving medical assistance through the state 's Medicaid program other than the Medicaid payment toward the Part B Premium, as described on the letter received. If the client 's status with Medicaid is changing, a new application may be submitted for review with the questions answered
Unit 8 Assignment: Understanding Medicare Part D Tierra J. Neal Kaplan University Professor Eboni Green Health Policy May 2, 2016 Unit 8 Assignment: Understanding Medicare Part D In this paper I will provide information on the influences that helped stakeholders decide on the final outcome of Medicare Part D legislation. I will also list the different strategies and tools that were utilized to be most effective during the decision making of passing the legislation.
One of the well-known federal fraud and abuse statutes in the United States is the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which greatly influences business relationships in the pharmaceutical, healthcare and medical device sectors. This statute is an Anti-Corruption law, which is designed to protect beneficiaries of the federal health care program from money influence on various referral decisions. Thus, this law helps in guarding against an increase in costs, overutilization and poor quality services. However, this law needs some modifications to become more efficient to all the U.S citizens. The lawmakers in the country should take the initiative of amending this bill so as to ensure that they adequately represent the interests of those people who
In the excerpt from “The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform”, John Samples argues that the passing of the McCain-Feingold Act is no means for celebration. Samples argues that money and Freedom of Speech, as well as other rights enunciated in the Constitution, are intertwined. Samples begins by examining the purposes of the McCain-Feingold Act. Although the law itself explains little about its purposes and the “special interest” influences it tried to reduce, supporters of the Act expected the law to accomplish many purposes. These purposes include curbing special interests, such as stopping the use of soft money as a means of buying influence, ending the appearance of corruption, and reducing some kinds of political advertising, such as issue ads, which target particular candidates in an attempt to influence the outcome of an election.
The Disclose Act of 2010, was one of the most polarizing pieces of legislation to be debated during the 111th Congress controlled by Democrats. Regardless of its polarizing nature, the act was able to pass the House, where it then was halted in the Senate due to the filibuster. The failure to pass S.3628 the Disclosure Act of 2010 in the Senate displays how much polarization can inhibit Congress, as well as the severity of the institutional frameworks that protect minority parties in the Senate. The Disclose Act of 2010 were pieces of legislation introduced by Democrats into both the House and Senate after the decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310, which ruled that “under the First Amendment corporate funding
“Interest groups tend to be single-issue organizations (Levin –Waldman, 2012)”. “Interest groups also tends to pursue their goals by making policy-related appeals to government (Levin- Waldman, 2012)”. Interest groups also supports diversity of different people. “The activity of the interest groups is induced by their ability and desire to affect the final policy outcome in the legislature. ”(Epstein, Mealem, & Nitzan, 2013)
Judson Berger argues that “Whereas colonists back then were revolting against, among other things, unfair tax policies, the impetus now lies in federal spending and intervention that many fear will lead to a crushing tax burden”. Washington is filled with “Lobbyist” whom make use government officials for their best interest. Many Lobbyist, were previous government official, therefore they have great knowledge on how the government works and have personal connections in Washington. Career politicians must do whatever they can to
In conclusion, these authors have described a legislative process that we were not taught in school. They describe a legislature that uses unique means to get their policies passed instead of what we were told where the legislature compromises to get legislation passed. Representatives also use unique ways to exploit their offices to get elected/reelected. This includes how they present themselves to their constituents and what they say to them. But the authors also explain how representatives behave in Washington.
Recent years have seen a massive expansion in both federal government spending and also of interest group activity” (Sobel, J.R 528). According to the article, lobbying activities are speeding by 25 percent in Washington D.C. “Initial results support the party rules account of state decisions regarding Medicaid expansion” (Callaghan, Timothy, Lawrence 310). Works cited “Analysis: When a Disclosure is No Disclosure at All” www.texastribune.org/2017/04/05/analysis-when-disclosure-no-disclosure-all/. Rosemary Ramsey, 2015.
Representatives are elected from the United States citizenry to represent the people in Congress. Congressmen have to balance three things, national affairs, constituency matters, and party interests. Congress is influenced by money for campaigning, however normally this money comes from organizations and PAC's, for example the AARP. However the money does not come in the form of a bribe, with the AARP, instead they send out a questionnaire to candidates, and if they feel the candidate represents their interests, they will give them money for their campaign. PAC's are formed to combat individual donors and big businesses; they are essentially a pool of money, which represents certain interests.
“The Revolving Door of Washington” is a long-standing trope of American politics by which legislators become lobbyists and vice versa. Whether it is Obama’s appointment of ex-Comcast lobbyist Tom Wheeler to chairmanship of the Federal Communcations Commission, or the immediate lucrative hire of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor by an investment bank that he had been regulating on the House Financial Services Committee, the symbiotic relationship of government and interest groups is not simply the result of a single 2010 court case. These findings are indicative that congressmen will not always do right by their district, and that many congressmen hold ulterior motives in their office, which points to the fact that the job performance of a federal legislator is not independent of interest groups or the manner in which lawmakers are elected. In this case, the manner in which the legislator is elected does play a role in how they legislate. If candidates were not burdened by the fundraising process, and were not permitted to take any money (directly or via Super- PAC) from interest groups, the focus of the election would dramatically switch.
Because AMAC is challenging AARP by saying that people shouldn’t chose because of its political positions, AARP supports “abortion’s (pro-life), taxes (wants them to be cut), budgeting issues (Constitutional balanced budget amendments)
This is especially evident in parties, which don’t accept corporate contributions, for instance the green party. The disproportionate sums of money from corporate donations greatly overwhelm what the average individual can provide. This, in turn, shifts focus and marginalizes the speech of other groups, which distorts public debates. Barack Obama summed this up by saying that the decision, “gives the special interests and their lobbyists even more power in Washington—while undermining the influence of average Americans who make small contributions to
Do you ever run into roadblocks and challenges? Do you ever wonder what this challenge will uncover as you begin to face it? Some challenges are not meant to be solved, but there is a reason behind that. However, in terms of our government as a whole, we need to face issues together. Our biggest challenge facing our new president will be getting our congress to agree and work with our President.
The part of interest groups in dealing with Medicare in any aspect is primarily negative. It all goes back to the initial implementation of Medicare. This changed over time as the interest for the necessities of the elderly changed. Medicare Part D fundamentally altered the interest groups that sustained and struggled with it. The most insightful result was the political depiction of the older generation.
