Khadka 2
Asmita Khadka Professor S. 1 Sharifian GOVT 2306-73011 4th April 2017 Lobbyists and Interest Groups in Texas “Lobbyists are salespeople hired to persuade decision-makers in the Legislature and in the agencies of the executive branch”. A group of people drawn or acting together in support of a commoninterest or to voice a common concern as defined by dictionary.com. 2 “State law requires lobbyists to report what they spend on legislators and other state officials. But the loopholes are big: Less than 5 percent of the lobby's reported spending on food and beverage names the eaters and the drinkers” (Analysis: 3 When a Disclosure is No Disclosure at All, 2015). Lobbyist are supposed to be facilitating the people whereas, it’s found that
…show more content…
It is the responsibility of the government to clear those doubts because it is the hard money of every citizen not of the government. Lobbyist doesn’t have to provide any report of the money they are spending until they reach limit of 114$ per day. 3 “They are not necessarily interested in feeding and watering those officials, but in having enough time together to make a case for whatever notion they’re pushing” (Analysis: When a Disclosure is No Disclosure at All, 2015). Rather than spending the money in some beneficial scheme for the people, they are spending food and beverages. According to the article, they are spending $4.7 million on food and beverages whereas only $2.5 million on legislative branch employees. It is a critical case that such a huge amount of money is just spent on those simple …show more content…
Individual opinion is discarded when it comes to deal with egoistic interest group. It’s so obvious that group with huge money have greater probability of wining but necessarily not be right one. Here, individual voice which probably may be right and fair but is suppressed because of inferiority.
In the article interest group activity and government growth “The interest group theory of government holds that the activities of well-organized interest groups produce government spending and policies. Recent years have seen a massive expansion in both federal government spending and also of interest group activity” (Sobel, J.R 528). According to the article, lobbying activities are speeding by 25 percent in Washington D.C. “Initial results support the party rules account of state decisions regarding Medicaid expansion” (Callaghan, Timothy, Lawrence 310).
Works cited “Analysis: When a Disclosure is No Disclosure at All” www.texastribune.org/2017/04/05/analysis-when-disclosure-no-disclosure-all/. Rosemary Ramsey, 2015. Web. April 5
Nevertheless, while federal law dictates that political advertisers must file a disclosure report if contributions exceed $10,000, donors can easily maintain their identities nonetheless. Furthermore, donors can now easily transfer money through “intermediary nonprofits”, otherwise known as super PACs (Murray Digby Marziani 2-3). In 2010 and 2012, “70-80% of super PAC finances directly supported or opposed federal candidates, and in 2012, super PACs spent a total of $620.9 million supporting or opposing House, Senate, and presidential candidates (United States Cong. Congressional Research Service 1-3). As a result, individuals have been left unaware of the influences corporations and other groups have had on federal
According to information provided by The Sunlight Foundation, a non-partisan non-profit organization whose goal is increasing transparency and accountability in the United States Congress, political action committees, employees and their family members of interests in the three sectors have contributed more than $51 million over the years to lawmakers either on committees overseeing the reform process or closely involved with crafting
Lee H. Hamilton, a former congressman in the House of Representatives, wrote, The Case for Congress, to share some of the criticisms he has heard over the years and to explain the effects of such opinions. Hamilton speaks of three main criticisms: “Congress is run by lobbyists and special interests”, “Congress almost seems to promote total gridlock”, and “There’s too much money in Politics” (Hamilton 2004). For each of these criticisms, Hamilton explains these thoughts and his opinion on the matter. The strongest point of Hamilton’s argument was in defending the lobbyists in Congress. Hamilton (2004) said the public opinion of lobbyists is that “Congress is manipulated by powerful wheel-dealers who put pressure on legislators and buy votes through extensive campaigns and other favors” (p. 83).
In the article “Learning to Love our Lobbyist Friends”, Frederick Allen argues that lobbyists are an imperfect necessity to democracy. Allen argues that Americans adore the lobbyists who represent them, yet despise the ones who represent causes they oppose. Allen examines the history of lobbying, and how their transparency has changed over time. Lobbying has changed from a shady and secretive system composed of bribery and scandal to a much more open and heavily regulated system whose lobbyists are well-educated and dedicated to their causes. Although scandals and cases of bribery still do occur now, various pieces of legislation have been passed over the past century to make lobbying more transparent, with registration for a lobbyist being
Samuel Sierzega 10/7/2015 BUSN 118 Lobbyists: Kings of the Hill The United States ' political system has been abused by years of corruption. This corruption is not hidden by cover ups or even conspiracy theories composed by nuts wearing tin foil hats, it is in plain sight. Corporations, lobbyists and congress have been engaging in a vicious cycle of corruption. Congress has abused their power of public servants by accepting this legal bribery. An amendment to the constitution needs to be added so money can be taken out of politics to provide fair elections to elect congressmen that stand for the people, and not special interest groups.
Knowing the audience that would read this article would feel enraged by the enormous amount of money. By bolding and underling key words that support his emotional approach he emphasizes words to cause a reaction such as failed, idle, special bonus, lobbying, biggest donor, top donor, series, enormous flop, lavished policymakers, manipulated, and never-ending spiral. These carefully chosen words are brought to the reader’s attention. The amount of money being wasted is in bold $1.7 billion, $700 million, $2.2 billion, $230 million, and $40 billion. By bringing these words to our attention he knew it would cause an emotional response from the reader.
Judson Berger argues that “Whereas colonists back then were revolting against, among other things, unfair tax policies, the impetus now lies in federal spending and intervention that many fear will lead to a crushing tax burden”. Washington is filled with “Lobbyist” whom make use government officials for their best interest. Many Lobbyist, were previous government official, therefore they have great knowledge on how the government works and have personal connections in Washington. Career politicians must do whatever they can to
Some famous lobbyists are people such as Daniel Hodge, Andrea Williams, And dean McWillams. Let’s start with Mr. Daniel Hodge, Hodge's moved away from Abbott's office to a career in lobbying propelled him to the pinnacle of Texas lobbyists, thanks to his close to power. He is employed at Strategic & Public Affairs Consulting and, at present, holds no contracts funded by taxpayers and now “The Chickasaw Nation is his top client”.
The following analysis will expand upon one of the congressional caricatures observed in Hamilton 's article: the act of lobbying misrepresents the public 's opinion and should not be endorsed. Hamilton proposes a precisely balanced approach to lobbying. He states that lobbyists are principled people who play a large part of focussing the public 's attention on significant issues and are key to helping Congress members stay informed. He emphasizes that those who practice lobbying do so, in the open, as part of "the broader policy debate" (as cited in Stinebrickner, 2015, p. 117). As a previous member of congress, Hamilton 's opinion on the matter is soon justified and I agree with him.
Today, we still find significant concerns for how vast and powerful interest groups and their associated PACs have become over the past few decades, and their far reaching ability they have to affect even the highest court in the
Congress’s processes for reviewing and debating proposed legislation may be streamlined because, with the executive branch, the constituents, and the interest groups, it can help the process run smoothly. It should be streamlined because the executive branch aims at improving the function of the departments or agencies that Congress already has created as the constituents make telephone calls, respond to public opinion polls, and send faxes to keep in reach with their elected officials. Individuals and groups seek to influence members of Congress and legislation through lobbying, which they have to be well informed, knowledgeable, organized, and cooperative in order to convey others. The values that are served by streamlining is it helps to
Interest groups in Texas are relatively powerful actors in the political process. Organized interest groups and their representatives, also known as “the lobby” participates in the policymaking and political processes in Texas. Interest groups provide critical channels for Texans to communicate their political preferences and attempt to influence government actors and their fellow
A Congressman is influenced to vote a particular way from a variety of sources, including the general public, lobbyists, interest groups, the media, and other politicians. It is hard to say exactly, if it is the news media that has influence on what congressional hearings take place, or is it the other way around, and congressional hearings influence what the media is reporting. Riots, Police, Weapon Control, Child Abuse, Prisons, Illegal Drugs, Organized Crime, Juvenile Crime and Criminal Code all fall under the Law, Crime and Family Issues title. This subject matter was compared between the years of 1946 and 2005, with the percentage of congressional hearings and the percentage of news reports in the New York Times. This study shows similar trends in percentages, but a higher influence of media coverage on the number of congressional hearings.
4. They are source of ideas and innovations. Lobbyists can’t introduce bills, but they can introduce an idea to and politician who will be eager to attach the lobbyists name