Could you imagine a bunch of young boys on an island by themselves? Picture naked boys running around everywhere. The boys would be looking around frantically for food. The young boys would have to become hunters to survive the starvation. Lord of The Flies shows how chaotic something like this could turn out. The movie Lord of The Flies follows most of the book’s storyline. Although, the movie strays away from the book in places. There were some important objects that played a big role in both the book and movie. While the characters are still the same they have subtle changes throughout the book. Some of the little things in the book was changed in the movie. “A stone?” “No. A shell.” “Suddenly Piggy was a-bubble with decorous excitement.” This conch shell was an important figure in both the movie and the book. The shell brought all the boys together for the first time on the island. It called all …show more content…
The boy with the mulberry birthmark on his face that died in the first fire in the book was never mentioned in the movie. When the book started the pilot was nowhere to be found in contrast in the movie the pilot was with the boys. The pilot was delusional and injured, but he was still there. The pilot ran away and faked his own death. He went to live in a cave, yet Simon found him on accident. When Simon went to inform the boys, there was no beastie he was mistaken for the beast and killed. This happened in both the book and movie. Although in the book it was the pilot that came down with a parachute when his plane was hit, and killed him. Which goes back to Simon in the book Simon was talking to the pig’s head when he found the pilot; although in the movie he was just staring at the head. The twins Sam and Eric were captured by Jack’s new tribe in the book although in the movie they joined Jack’s group. Not only was some of the characters different, but there were little changes in objects in