ipl-logo

The Most Dangerous Game Compare And Contrast

696 Words3 Pages

Shipwrecked. Stranded on a desert island. Human prey. There is nothing that will get your attention more than that. The Most Dangerous Game tells a tale of a man who was involved in a human hunting game. The book was later written as a movie. Although the base of the movie was similar, the characters and their adventures slightly changed in comparison to the book. The ending, on the other hand was dramatically different. Sometimes reading a book and watching a movie can tell two different stories, such is the case with The Most Dangerous Game. “There are two types of people: the hunter and the hunted.” This was a famous quote from the story. Although Robert Rainsford thought he was a hunter, The General classified him as the hunted, along with all other humans who passed through the island. Rainsford discovers that General Zaroff hunts humans when he does not agree to hunt with Zaroff. Rainsford becomes the next target. Rainsford and Zaroff have three days to hunt each other, and Rainsford is on a mission to kill him. Rainsford’s …show more content…

Rainsford is still looking after Eve, and their time for the hunting game is up. Everyone, including Zaroff, remain alive. Rainsford and Eve head back to Zaroff’s house, and Zaroff begins to attack them. Rainsford kills the last of Zaroff’s servants then fights Zaroff. During Rainsford and Zaroff’s struggle, Rainsford kills Zaroff by stabbing him with an arrow. This is when Rainsford escapes the house. He gets Eve, and they find the boat that Zaroff said they could use if they won. When they were in the boat leaving, Eve notices that Zaroff is still not dead. He is about to shoot them with his bow and arrow, but since he had already been stabbed, he lost his balance and ends up falling out of the window. Rainsford and Eve now continue on their journey home. In both situations Rainsford was a brave man. He fought for his life, and, in the film, he manages to keep Eve safe along with

Show More
Related
616 Words | 3 Pages

Rainsford was a hunter but he became a hunted. Rainsford is faced with the challenge in the middle of the story. Also, the importance of empathy is shown through the changes that occur in Rainsford in the beginning, middle, and end of the story. Moreover, it seems that Zaroff considers himself a god who can snuff out life as he pleases.

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

“The Most Dangerous Game” Contrast paper The most dangerous game by Richard Connell states that there was a guy named General Zaroff who believed in hunting humans. Also there was a man named richard who was a book writer and they both had different opinions. But what the General didn 't know was that rainsford was that was very very smart.and that the book and the movie had two different sides to the story. There is a movie and and a book and the book and the movie are very different. In the movie some people will say that rainsford was dumb founded because when general Zaroff was about to hunt them rainsford

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

Rainsford also exhibits courage by doing anything to survive. During Rainsford’s first meal with the general, Zaroff tells of his hunts, expressing the rush he gets from his kills. Rainsford is appalled, telling him it is murder, and would not take part in what Zaroff planned. Of course, he had limited options and ultimately was forced to participate as the newest quarry. However, when the third day of the hunt was nearing completion, Zaroff, Ivan, and his hounds were hot on Rainsford’s trail.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Do you like action-paced stories? Well, if you do, you will love these two stories. "The Most Dangerous Game", released in 1924, was a very action-paced story. It's about a sailor who crashed his boat and is stuck on Ship-Trap island, about to get hunted. Along with this theme, is another story, High Noon.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Though "High Noon" and "The Most Dangerous Game" are two different stories, they have some comparisons within the context, such as the characters, settings, themes, and the conflicts in the story. In the the Most Dangerous Game written by Richard Connel, a hunter learns how it feels to be hunted while be stranded on an island. In High Noon a retired sheriff learns the true meaning of responsibility and trust when he has to face a group of gunners, alone. In this essay, I will compare and contrast the stories and see what they they have and don't have in common to see how it affects the story.

Read More
1342 Words | 6 Pages

Although comparing and contrasting brings new depth to stories ' elements, the true adventures lurk deep within the core of the tales, such as in The Most Dangerous Game and High Noon. In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, written by Richard Connell, the main character must survive on an isolated island for three whole days while learning what it is like to endure nothing but fear, such as an animal being hunted. The movie, High Noon, written by Carl Foreman, is a Wild Western film swarming with guns, horses, and sweet, sweet revenge! Will Kane, the main character, is obligated to serve his town since he is the marshal, but when his enemy, Frank Miller, returns to town to kill him, Kane must face his death sentence alone.

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

[then] an idea that held a wild chance came to him” (651-654). Connell further creates a sense of hopelessness and dread with the phrase “postponing the inevitable” since it is only a matter of time before Rainsford gets brutally murdered by Zaroff. This phrase also gives the reader a glimpse into Rainsford’s thoughts and makes sure that the reader understands the situation. The fact that Rainsford thinks of an idea with a slim chance of success can only mean that he is on the verge of giving up and succumbing to Zaroff and his dogs. Rainsford commits to his plan and starts running until he reached “the shore of the sea.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

Your strength and stamina against mine’” (10) Zaroff is challenging Rainsford to the

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

At this time, Hollywood was always trying add dramatic twists to movies. To begin with, they added a girl to the movie. The girl also has a brother who is lured into playing Zaroff’s game and is eventually killed. Rainsford and this girl seem to be intimate. Also, Rainsford doesn’t fall off of his yacht.

Read More
653 Words | 3 Pages

Hunters believe animals are not capable of reasoning and they see them as something lesser than humans. Throughout time, these positions can change. The short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, consists of General Zaroff being the hunter and Rainsford being the hunted. During the story, their positions change to the complete opposite.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

"The Most Dangerous Game" statement of The world is made up of two classes -- "the hunters and the huntees" is a great statement that makes sense. The Most Dangerous Game is about a man named Zaroff who lives on an island by himself. The people that come to the island get trained to get ready for the game. The game involves people going through the jungle, hiding from Zaroff as he hunts them. Both the hunters and the huntees have a different view on the conflict.

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

“‘You have won the game.’ Rainsford did not smile. ‘I am still a beast at bay…’Get ready General Zaroff’” (20) He doesn’t kill Zaroff for any reason other than revenge. By beast at bay Rainsford is saying he doesn’t have anywhere to go, so he wants to fight Zaroff, until someone dies which is ironic because Rainsford states that he is against killing another human being when he first meets Zaroff at the beginning of the story.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Tanner Toussaint In the short story The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff. One of the reasons why Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff is on the island the only way to live is to hunt or to be the one being hunted. Secondly, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because Zaroff wanted to die. Lastly, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because killing Zaroff is going to be the only way Rainsford will escape the island from a psychopath.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Here in the story General Zaroff is injured by a trap that Rainsfords set. “But he was not quick enough, the dead tree crashed down and struck the general.(232) This quote shows Irony when in the start of the hunt General Zaroff thought that this was going to be an easy kill and he could continue on. Throughout the story Zaroff and Rainsford both exert arrogance.

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

He had to fight himself to stay on track. He was so scared in the jungle while the General was trying to hunt him. On page 186, it says “He could not say where he was. That was suicide.” This shows the reader that Rainsford may be thinking of what could go wrong, and is not thinking on the positive side of things.

Read More

More about The Most Dangerous Game Compare And Contrast

Related Topics

Open Document