ipl-logo

The Most Dangerous Game Rhetorical Analysis

364 Words2 Pages

Most Dangerous Game Argumentation Paragraph The story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is about Sanger Rainsford ends up on an island with General Zaroff, who hunts humans. Rainsford ends up playing General Zaroff’s game and becomes the huntee while Zaroff is the hunter. Zaroff loses the game and gets killed by Rainsford. Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. During the time Rainsford is in Zaroff’s house they have a conversation about hunting. Zaroff tells Rainsford about him hunting humans. Rainsford says, “I can’t believe you are serious, General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke........... what you speak of is murder” (Connell 5). Rainsford is very astonished by this, if you couldn’t tell.The reader can infer that this isn’t the only time that Zaroff has killed a person because he made a game of it. Usually, when someone commits a murder, they are punished …show more content…

If I find him, the general smiled, he loses” (Connell 5). In this section of the story, Zaroff is explaining the rules of the game to Rainsford. When Zaroff says “If I find him…..he loses,” you can highly infer by this that when he says “loses” he means they die, so he’s practically saying that is Rainsford loses, he dies. Typically, when one knows they are going to die, they do what they can to save themselves, which is what Rainsford did. Since Zaroff is hunting humans, one of them is most likely to die. Murder can not go unpunished. Rainsford would most likely have died if he didn’t kill Zaroff. Some may say that one should never kill no matter what. Well, if Rainsford himself never killed Zaroff, he would have died. He was defending himself by killing Zaroff. It is highly understood that one should not kill but what would you do if someone was hunting you and trying to kill you? Would you let them or would you kill them to save

Show More
Related
214 Words | 1 Pages

The short story “The Most Dangerous Game’’, Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff . Rainsford is a hunter who fell off a yacht at Ship Trap Island where he meets General Zaroff. General Zaroff is a hunter too. He stays on the island and hunts. Rainsford and General Zaroff are fighting to their death because General Zaroff wants to hunt Rainsford.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

Zaroff had this theory that Rainsford was trying to kill him and he was right but for a good reason. Rainsford walked up to the

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

One of the most important conflicts in “The Most Dangerous Game” is man versus self with General Zaroff being overconfident, resulting in his own death. In the story General Zaroff, in multiple occasions has the upper hand and could kill Rainsford, it keeps him alive because he believes that he could just hunt him again later. That plan fails and Rainsford with his instincts outsmarts Zaroff and kills the hunter when he least expects it. General Zaroff gets himself killed by prolonging his hunt for Rainsford when he could have killed him on multiple occasions. “The hunter shook his several times, he straightened up and took from his case one of his black cigarettes; its pungent, incelen like smoke floated up to Rainsfords nostrils.

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

After having no other option than to play the game, Rainsford starts playing it by the rules to prove how honorable of a man he is. The latter comes very close to killing Zaroff using one of his cunning three traps. After escaping the third trap, Zaroff and his pack of hounds continue their chase. Rainsford then smartly gets away from the hunter by leaping into the sea and making his was back to

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

“The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell, is a narrative about Mr. Sanger Rainsford, a celebrated hunter, who finds himself on a secluded island after falling overboard a yacht. Rainsford locates a large building on the island and meets General Zaroff, who invites him to rest and replenish his health in his home. After Zaroff explains that he also enjoys hunting, he also reveals that he has discovered a new, more dangerous animal to hunt: humans. Zaroff forces Rainsford to become the hunted in order to win his freedom and return to the mainland. Connell’s central idea suggests that instinct does not always yield to reason.

Read More
217 Words | 1 Pages

Implying the Gen. Zaroff is going to kill Rainsford, so Rainsford killed Zaroff in self defense. My second reason is that Zaroff killed people. On page (25-26) Gen. Zaroff described his perfect animal humans. That was one of the main reasons that Rainsford killed Gen. Zaroff. My last reason is that no more sailors would be lured to the thought of safety by a lighthouse which is described on page (26-27) of how sailors

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

The next element used in the story is irony. Irony is used to make readers think about the story and or it can emphasize the central idea. In “The Most Dangerous Game” Connell uses irony quite a few time. The irony of the main conflict is that Sanger Rainsford is on the the world’s best hunters, yet he ends up being hunted by General Zaroff. “‘ We’ll have capital hunting, you and I,’ said the general.”

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Man vs Man; the winner survives, the loser dies. High Noon and "The Most Dangerous Game" both demonstrate that in excellent ways. The 1952 movie High Noon is about a town marshal named Will Kane who arrested a man named Frank Miller. Miller wanted revenge so he returned to the town to try to kill Kane.

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

“Hunting people is not murdering”. This shows General Zaroff 's problem , he hunts humans like animals . Most dangerous game is a short story where General Zaroff sets people up to land on his island , where he keeps them captive and kills them . General zaroff should be prosecuted for hunting humans . He kills innocent people , he sets them up so the people can land on his island and he feeds his victims to his dogs .

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

When you’re in a tough situation, you should always do what's right even if it creates enemies. “The Most Dangerous Game” Takes place on Ship-trap island the island is man made by General Zaroff the feeling the is dark, dense, and terrifying. A well-known hunter named Rainsford is going to hunt in Rio get kill jaguars. On his way there he fell overboard and ended up swimming to Ship-Trap Island witch Zaroff owned. Zaroff is another hunter but he moved out there because there is more game out there and they put up a better fight.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

His short story, "The Most Dangerous Game", features two men, Rainsford and Zaroff, both very experienced hunters with two completely different mindsets. Rainsford was traveling by boat when a large storm knocked him overboard. He began to swim to an island he had seen earlier the night, it was on this island that he met Zaroff, and older man with a passion for hunting and a craving for adrenaline. Zaroff explains that he grew

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

Rainsford’s only way to do this is to not only get through Zaroff’s traps but to defeat him. The only option Rainsford has is to kill Zaroff which means he has to put his new beliefs aside on how hunting men is wrong, Rainsford says, “Hunting? Good God, General

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

In The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell suggests that the hunter is not that different from the hunted when the big game hunter Rainsford becomes general Zaroff’s prey. Rainsford believes that hunting is a game because he doesn’t value the lives of the animals he hunts. When conversing with his hunting companion Whitney, Rainsford presents his view of the subject by stating that, ”You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”(92). Contradicting his superior’s opinion, Whitney suggests that “they understand one thing—fear. The fear of pain and the fear of death.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

In general, people tend to shy away from teaching children about difficult times in history such as the Middle Passage, the Trail of Tears, and the Holocaust. This is understandable since they are children and tend to have other interests like playing games with their friends. What if one could combine education of these difficult topics with the allure of a kid friendly game? Brenda Romero did just that. In her Ted Talk, “Gaming for Understanding,” Romero mentions that she has been making all sorts of games since she was fifteen.

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

However, it does not change for the better. In the middle of the story when he finds out Zaroff hunts fellow human beings, to Zaroff's surprise, Rainsford’s thought and reaction is utter shock and disbelief. “‘But you can’t mean-’ gasped Rainsford. ‘And why not?’”(10). Zaroff knowing Rainsford was a great hunter he hoped that Rainsford would accompany him on a hunt; however, Rainsford accuses him of being a cold-blooded killer.

Read More

More about The Most Dangerous Game Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document