The Myth Of Sisyphus Response Paper

700 Words3 Pages

The Myth of Sisyphus In "The Myth of Sisyphus," Albert Camus illustrates his philosophy of the absurd, which is founded on the assumption that life has no inherent value or purpose. According to Albert Camus, this absence of meaning causes a state of existential crisis, which can lead to discouragement or even suicide. However, he states that there is a way out of this crisis by embracing the absurdity of life and finding happiness in the struggle. In this response paper, I will look at two statements from Camus' work that indicate his views on the absurd. First, I'll assume the role of a believer and explain why Camus is correct. Then I'll pretend to be a doubter and explain why Camus is wrong. According to Camus, absurdity emerged from the conflict between our human desire for meaning and purpose and the universe's essential meaninglessness. According to Camus, "There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide." "Judging whether or not life is worth living amounts to answering the fundamental question of philosophy" (Camus, 1955, p. 3). In other words, if life is ultimately pointless, why bother living? As a believer in Camus' philosophy, I believe he is correct in his judgment of the absurd. The human pursuit of meaning is an essential aspect of our existence, yet the universe appears to offer no intrinsic meaning or …show more content…

While this may be a valid perspective for some individuals, it is not necessarily the only way to approach the absurd. Some individuals may find meaning and purpose in religion, spirituality, or other belief systems that offer a different perspective on the universe and our place within it. As a doubter, I would argue that Camus’ philosophy is too narrow and does not take into account the diversity of human experience and