ipl-logo

The Name Of First Selected Interpretation: Free Access To Libraries For Minors

968 Words4 Pages

Raina Yang
INFO 234-Intellectual Freedom
Library Bill of Rights Assignment
September 13, 2015

Part One: First Interpretation
Name of first selected interpretation: Free Access to Libraries for Minors
How can librarians uphold the principles in Free Access to Libraries for Minors?
Article V of the American Library Association’s Library Bill of Rights stated, “A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background or views.” The “right to use a library” includes free access to, and unrestricted use of, all the services, materials, and facilities the library has to offer (ALA, 2010). Librarians and their services in the library should uphold the principles of free access to minors. Therefore, minors …show more content…

A librarian could violate the principles by limiting collection development based on personal biases and opinions. For example, librarians may put up signs that states “Adults Only.” This can make minors feel restricted in that area. Minors should have the freedom to seek, receive and impart information in any form or by means of their choice. It is not in the authority of the librarian to decide whether contents in the library are appropriate or not. Ultimately, it is the decisions of the parents and guardians to decide what is appropriate for their children.
In addition, librarians can violate equal access to minors by restricting age limits for participation in library events. Sunnyside Regional Library held a “Make your own short graphic novel” event and the age restriction was 14 and up. Therefore, the age ranges from teens to adults. The objective of the event was to have patrons create their own stories and illustrate them. This limits younger adolescents from participating and expressing their ability to be creative or worst, their access to library …show more content…

According to ALA, librarian have the professional responsibility to be fair, just, and equitable and to give all library users equal protection in guarding against violation of the library patron’s right to read, view, or listen to materials and resources protected by the First Amendment, no matter what the viewpoint of the author, creator, or selector. If librarians violate this responsibility, then the librarian is also violating the principles put forth in the Library Bill of Rights regarding diverse collection development. It’s the librarian’s sole responsibility to protect the library’s collections from losing materials based on prejudice against certain materials. If a librarian is putting their own views ahead of these principles then they are doing a disservice to their patrons and their library in which they work. Lastly, librarians who do not work hard to provide adequate materials that meet the library community’s needs by following standards and by using established review and selection procedures are also violating these

Show More
Related
830 Words | 4 Pages

The day ended with the heavy scent of oily smoke instead of the cool tropical breezes usual to Hawaiian weather. The hard wails of ambulances and clamor of emergency crews replaced the soft crash of waves against serene beaches and calming music of a ukulele. Deep colorful sunsets of paradise vistas were replaced with the dark crimson of make-shift hospitals to treat the multitudes of wounded and dying. On 7 December 1941, The Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) attacked Pearl Harbor. President Roosevelt accurately captured the sentiment of The United States when he addressed Congress, “Yesterday, December 7, 1941—a date which will live in infamy—the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

Brennon, Jr. said,” If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” • Also, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas said, “Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us. • The Office for Intellectual Freedom of the American Library Association says in the Library Bill of Rights, that “Librarians and governing bodies should maintain that parents-and only parents- have the right and responsibility to restrict the access of their children-and only their children- to library resources.” • Censorship by librarians for any reason, is a violation of the first amendment

Read More
1539 Words | 7 Pages

Not only will this limit the student’s freedom, but their imagination as well. A new world is discovered in reading, whether it is a non-fictional or a creative fictional world. Taking this away from the students can limit their creativity and imagination a book can offer (Graff). According to Mark Hemingway, many parents still do not seem to grasp the idea that the problem of needless confrontational children’s entertainment is now present in text too, and not just on television. Hemingway also states that children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics in school or public libraries.

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

Banning books in school libraries takes away students academic freedom. “Academic freedom is the right and responsibility of educators and students to study, investigate, present, interpret

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

The best solution, in this case, would definitely be the first alternative. Using the Library Bill of Rights to argue against the fact that libraries should be exempt from this kind of ruling as it violates the librarians’ intellectual and academic freedom. Librarians similar to college professors in which they should be allowed the same amount of freedom to speak and publish in the areas of their expertise. Vigilance would be the Walker Public Library's best defense for protecting these rights. For starters, the library staff must uphold ALA’s statement, "resisting abuse of governmental power, and to support those against whom such governmental power has been employed”, as they plan to fight for getting their rights back.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

So why not let them better prepare themselves by reading a more challenging and mature book. Therefore, I believe that school board members should not ban books from the school library because, students can get more of a challenge from certain books, you also can get many life lessons from a more mature book, and students also get more of a choice which means more books to read. So I think it is completely wrong to ban books from the school

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

By adhering to the Child Internet Protection Act (CIPA), King County Libraries are allowing the federal government to restrict access to certain content on the internet for minors. The ALA code of ethics states that “we uphold the principles of intellectual freedom and resist all efforts to censor library resources”, and while the United States Supreme court may not find CIPA to be in direct violation of the First Amendment, it appears to be a violation of the ALA code of ethics and in direct contrast with the ALA’s Freedom to Read statement. However, if the King County Library system decides to not adhere to CIPA’s required restrictions, we would lose $503,902 in federal funding and discounts. According to the FCC the Children’s Internet Protection

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

“the positive outcomes of reading included enjoyment, knowledge of the self and other people, social interaction, social and cultural capital, imagination, focus and flow, relaxation and mood regulation, as well as improvements in communication abilities and longer-term education outcomes.” (“The power of reading: how books help develop children’s empathy and boost their emotional development”). This statement talked about how the books that are prohibited are really enabling children to advance in school. This statement additionally discloses how kids associate with the books. " fiction causes us see how other individuals feel and think.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

Censoring books in libraries is a controversial topic. Some may think all books should be available to be read ,while others believe some books are too inappropriate to be placed in libraries.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

Intro 1: What if your young child is looking through a book at your public library and comes across a topic that was way too mature for their mind set. Would you be okay with it? A big controversial issue that has been going on in the past year is if books should be banned. Now, no one is trying to banish libraries across the globe but people have requested to ban books that are inappropriate. This matter has grown to be worse because everyone has an opinion.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

Children’s literature is the body of written works and accompanying illustrations produced inorder to entertain and instruct young people. The fundamental goal of children’s literature is to instruct and entertain. It covers various diverse themes such as mystery, fantasy and war. Some themes are discernible to the young reader, whereas some are more likely to be understood by an adult reader. This means that children’s literature is accessible to all ages, with different pieces of information within the text becoming clearer each time it is read.

Read More

More about The Name Of First Selected Interpretation: Free Access To Libraries For Minors

Related Topics

Open Document