ipl-logo

The Negative Aspects Of Propaganda During World War II

424 Words2 Pages

“Propaganda is used to promote a particular agenda or point of view. The goals of propaganda can vary, but common goals include shaping people's opinions, convincing them to support a particular cause or political candidate, or encouraging them to behave in a certain way.” (How Does Propaganda, 2022)

“Leaflet propaganda dropped by balloons and planes was used heavily in both world wars by all sides. In World War II, special bombs were developed to disperse airborne leaflets. Used as a form of psychological warfare, these leaflets were dropped in enemy-controlled territory to incite fear, coerce surrender, or turn the populace against their leadership. This tactic proved to be largely ineffective, except when morale among troops was extremely …show more content…

This concept has been painted with a negative paint brush. However, in its essence, the word propaganda is neither bad nor good; what is imperative is how it is practiced by the perpetrator. The concept can be negative or positive depending on the motive of the person, institution or government that is orchestrating the message.” (Positive Propaganda, 2022) Propaganda is often used by the government and other organizations to promote positive messages and lifestyles. For example, messages about healthy eating habits, drunk driving, effects of smoking, drug use, vaccine programs, violence against women, etc. are often conveyed through propaganda. Propaganda can also be used to promote unity, solidarity, and harmony among people during conflicts. Thus, propaganda can be positive, if it is used to help people and promote positive change in the society.The objectives of the propagandist are sometimes positive. The Smokey Bear Wildfire Prevention campaign is a form of propaganda. These advertisements make an emotional plea – don’t be careless with fire or cute woodland creatures may be harmed. The campaign was incredibly successful in preventing forest fires, but it may also have contributed to the public’s aversion to controlled

Open Document