ipl-logo

The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas

1054 Words5 Pages

Do you have an answer? Great. Now change the word you to the people of Omelas from Ursula Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” and Klondike Bar to the happiness, beauty, and success of Omelas and its inhabitants. The answer to the question now is to keep a single child trapped in “abominable misery”, never freeing it or even speaking a kind word to it. Despite using a child as a sacrifice so the majority of the city can live an untroubled life the narrator, who serves as the main character, never says a negative word about the people of Omelas. From the lack of criticism of those who stay, to the absence of guilt felt by Omelians, and finally to the anonymity of the story leads to the claim that Le Guin feels as if those who stay …show more content…

On the surface, it seems as if the ones who walk away are being courageous when in truth they are cowards. Although as Sarah Wyman states nearly all people would focus on the one “incarcerated lost soul” and claim freeing the kid is the more ethical choice than the belief that the needs of the many outweighs the needs of the one. No matter which option, a person chooses, by making a choice they are at least acknowledging the child and it’s suffering.The ones who leave remove themselves from the situation so they do not need to make the decision of whether to help the kid and damn the rest of society or preserve the “prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas” and keep the status quo regarding the child. By letting the child remain in it’s horrible situation and then not even acknowledging that it is in that situation for them, the one who walk away are truly cruel people of …show more content…

One example includes the Holocaust where the people being held in concentration camps and killed are the child trapped in a basement, the leaders of the Allies after WWI are the ones who leave Omelas, and the rest of the world are the ones who remain in Omelas. The Jewish people were being treated increasingly poorly, but the world had just finished a world war and no one wanted to dive back into another conflict so by ignoring the suffering a few the majority could live, at least comparatively, joyous lives. Just like the ones who walked away, the leaders of the Allies avoided taking action while pretending to be concerned at the treatment of others. The people left over are the citizens of Omelas on the grounds that despite knowing of the horrors going on, the knowledge of said horrors is pushed aside so they could keep their pleasant lives. The ones who could have done something for those who were suffering but didn’t, the presidents, prime ministers, and kings were not the superior one, they were the cowards who left. One other instance, as mentioned by Wyman, is when “contemporary Western capitalist society” serves as the ones who walk away and less developed countries symbolize the child. The third world countries undergo appalling conditions in order for the more developed

Show More
Related
878 Words | 4 Pages

In her article “Live Free and Starve,” Chitra Divakaruni explains why the United States House should not have passed the bill which prohibits the importation of products from factories where child labor is used. As a consequence, she mentions this bill will negatively affect the lives and livelihood of children and their families in Third World countries. Divakaruni uses multiple persuasive appeals by providing a personal anecdote and by using multiple examples, which enables the reader to relate to an emotional experience of how this bill will adversely affect these children. Divakaruni opens her argument by seeming to agree with the bill. She writes, “My liberal friends applauded the bill,” (428) stating that the bill was a triumphant advance

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

The Omelas' people only see things as that they are happy and the whole city is happy and that’s all that matters. The child is a mere sacrifice that they are willing to pay, and not a living, breathing, and damaged child. The people who see the child as a child, and not a sacrifice are free to leave the society without question. These people rebel against the idea of overlooking a child who is suffering and scared.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

I viewed Frontline a documentary series, which episode was entitled Poor Kids. The frontline personnel spent time with three children Kailey, Johnny, and Britany along with their families as they all struggle financially. We perceive a glimpse of what it is like to live below the poverty line in America through a child’s eyes. While observing the documentary, I became consciously aware that children who are considered poor or living below the poverty line were more mindful of the responsibilities of life. The children were worrisome of the lack of employment for their parents, bills, and in Britney’s case; how they would accommodate their way of living to support a new addition to the family.

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

An example of this is on lines 79-83 in “Perils of Indifference” it states, “The political prisoner in his cell, the hungry children, the homeless refuges - not to respond to their plight, not to relieve their solitude by offering them a spark of hope is to exile them from human memory. And in denying their humanity, we betray our own.” To summarize this quote, All of these people were suffering but were not helped. Humanity ignored them. They could have helped but didn’t ,therefore; humanity betrayed them.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

“Children in dingy basements, without air, food, without proper care, being forced into child labor for all these hours of the day” (Children Freed From Sweatshop Article). The children were restricted from living a fulfilling happy life; they had little food, love, or sleep. They were no longer children, they were a human machine, an assembly line, used to make profit. Another example of dehumanization in the modern world in happening in the Philippines. Leader of the country, President Rodrigo Duterte, has put into action the genocide of drug users.

Read More
159 Words | 1 Pages

If that children was set free, everyone else would be cursed, so to say or would then themselves live a terrible,miserable life. The ones that walk away are people that have been affected by the child anf realize it is wrong. I beleive they walk away because they can't take the guilt they feel for causing this

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

Many people of the city chose to leave the city, because they didn't believe in the act of hurting that child. “The trouble is that we have a bad habit, encouraged by pedants and sophisticates, of considering happiness as something rather stupid. Only pain is intellectual, only evil interesting. This is the treason of the artist; a refusal to admit the banality of evil and the terrible boredom of pain.” (Guin pg 444)

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

The Black Death In 1347 twelve Genoese trading ships docked at the Sicilian port of Messina. They just arrived after a long journey through the Black Sea. When the ships arrived The Black Death was unknowingly released to the people who have gathered to greet the ships and sailors. However when the ships arrived most of the sailors were dead and the few that were alive were deathly ill.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

The author gives the reader the question of if he/she would be able to live in their perfect utopia if they had the knowledge that a young child was having to suffer in exchange. The possible political stance behind this work leads one to question it more and wonder if there is such thing as our own Omelas in maybe a smaller less harsh form. “The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas” is a very powerful work, and once analyzed, could potentially lead to questions about our presence in the world that we live in

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

Over a few years, twenty-five thousand babies would be left out on the streets by their mothers(c). Jacob Riis described the mothers who would abandon their child on the street to die as "wretched(c).” Mothers, who are too afflicted with misery and poverty to make sure their child is taken care of. Murder is what he calls the women's action, as most babies picked up on the street later die in hospitals(c). He documented many other acts of cruelty against children.

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Children are viewed as pure and full of potential, they are the future, so when he gives testimonies that their finical status already limits one child at such a young age concerns his audience because of the lost potential. Moreover, society has this belief that children have the right to be nurtured, especially in the United States, so Gladwell focuses on displaying the lack of care from the community for these children taps into the audience’s concern and desire for

Read More
136 Words | 1 Pages

In ""Omelas"," the narrator describes that the child faces agony so that the rest of the population can live happily, but no rational clarification is given as to why this should be so and thus, Collins writes, Le Guin is able to make her reader question "a similar failure of Western capitalist theodicy": there is no good reason, despite the "historical, economic, political, racial-genetic-physical, geographical and religious elements" that Western readers may use to describe the "radical inequalities" of "`our ' world," as to why certain groups must suffer so that others can have a high standard of living. Le Guin 's ending, in which some individuals leave Omelas for a place "even less imaginable to most of us," points out finally that the

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

These ones who walk away are still in part guilty of not helping the child, though at least they are not reaping the crops of a human being’s

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

The basic needs in life are considered as water, food, and reproduction, and the simple wants are “central heating, subway trains, washing machines, and all kinds of marvelous devices” (p.2). The destruction to society could be one’s remorse for the child’s suffering. If one shows sympathy for the child and it is released from the basement, the city’s beauty and happiness will vanish. The child could represent selfless because its sacrifice is for the prosperity of Omelas. Le Guin explains that the society is a bargain between happiness and

Read More
1464 Words | 6 Pages

Poverty is universal but does vary within countries, even neighborhoods. According to society poverty is hunger, lack of shelter, not having the ability to see a doctor when necessary and limited education. In third world countries, it is very common for parents to conceive a high number of children as a source of labor. Not only do these kids frequently receive slight or no education, but large families in these countries are the main contributor to global overpopulation. These children are not privileged with the same basic opportunities given to an American child.

Read More

More about The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas

Related Topics

Open Document