ipl-logo

The Perils Of Indifference Speech Similarities And Differences

891 Words4 Pages

Comparison Between On the Right of Women to Vote and the Perils of Indifference Speeches “On the Right of Women to Vote by Suzan B. Anthony and “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel are among the most popular and significant speeches in the United States of America. Suzan B. Anthony made this speech in 1872 when she was accused to vote illegally. Elie Wiesel made his speech in 1999 where he was invited as intellectual to participate in Millennium Lecture Series. Although these speeches have some apparent similarities, the differences between them are also remarkable. Both On the Right of Women to Vote and The perils of Indifference were addressing social welfare problem and were addressed composed in almost similar rhetorical form. On …show more content…

This is was social welfare problem because everyone has the right to vote who leads him or her. Thus, having women with no rights to vote is violating their social welfare. Alike on the Right of Women to Vote, The Perils of Indifference addressed social welfare problem. Elie made this speech in 1999 after 54 years from world war two where social welfare were highly violated(Wiesel, 1999). Many Jews were tortured and killed by Nazis during the Second World War. These Jews were accused by Hitler to be of inferior race and meaningless. This was social welfare violation because there is no superior and inferior race apart from the bad myths of some societies. Alike, Elie, Suzan used repetitive words to emphasize on a given point. For instance, the world gratitude was used more than three times in “The Perils of Indifference” to emphasize on how he really appreciate gratitude. While the word oligarchy was used more …show more content…

Suzan B. Anthony started her speech by directly mentioning what was the problem. She mentioned that she is accused of illegal vote and that she is going to prove wrong those who accused her. This directly tell everyone the intention of the speech. In addition, from the beginning up to the end of her speech, Suzan was showing the ineffectiveness the system where only men were allowed to vote. Contrary, Elie started his story thanking USA army to the extent one might think the speech is all about appreciation. But the story become different in the middle of the speech where he mentioned how Americans turned a blind eye on Jews during the Second World War with reference to St. Louis case. In addition, at some extent Elie used to put himself in the audience by using pronoun “we” to avoid directing anything to someone. An example can be seen in the conclusion of his speech where he said “And together we walk towards the new millennium, carried by profound fear and extraordinary hope”. Different from Suzan speech’s conclusion, Elie Wiesel’s conclusion was a bit persuasive. In his conclusion, Elie mentioned that it is his opinion by saying “I think” and then provided his opinion. This is different from Suzan conclusion because it was a bit dictating and mentioning what mentioning what she thought as a true statement. This can be clearly seen

Show More
Related
345 Words | 2 Pages

Before August 18th, 1920, only men could vote in the United States. One person that helped to right this wrong was Carrie Chapman Catt. In Carrie Chapman Catt’s address to Congress on women’s suffrage, she uses logos, pathos, and other rhetorical devices to convince Congress to give women more rights. One tool that helps make this speech as effective as it is is logos. She demonstrates logos when introducing the second reason as to why women’s suffrage is inevitable.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

Susan B. Anthony Susan B. Anthony was a suffragist who fought for the right to vote for women. Anthony had several reasons for why a woman should not be deny the right to vote. Some of them being that women are also humans and as humans the constitution secures their rights and those rights could not be taken away. First, when they denied women’s right to vote it implied that they were not humans like every other man.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Seventy four years ago, Elie Wiesel was taken from of his town and forced into brutal concentration camps, where he lost his family, was starved, whipped, beaten, and made to witness the executions of many innocent Jews. After three years of unimaginable struggle and hardship, he survived the Holocaust and went on to write Night, a memoir about his horrific experiences, and “Perils of Indifference”, a famous speech. Both of his works have the same powerful message: We cannot ever allow an atrocity such as the Holocaust to occur again. Elie’s message is very important, but which of his works conveys it more effectively? Night has few ways of effectively delivering Elie’s message.

Read More
1885 Words | 8 Pages

His speech can fall under the belief/value category because he refers to virtues and morals throughout the speech. For example, Wiesel says, “What will the legacy of this vanishing century be? How will it be remembered in the new millennium? Surely it will be judged, and judged severely, in both moral and metaphysical terms.” This statement shows that Elie believes that the century will be judged and it is important to correct the mistakes of the past century, while entering the new one.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Today, millions of women can implement their rights to vote in all elections in the united states of America, but this (rights) did not come easily to those women who sacrifice their lives to make this happen. In the speech “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, Catt delivered her message for women’s right from a firsthand account of what she had experienced as a woman living in the United States of America in the 19th century. She advocated for the rights of women to vote because she believes in equal rights and justice for all citizens. The speech was very successful because of the use of ethos, pathos, and logos.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Therein, she expressed her ideas about women 's suffrage. She gave a talk to encourage American men and women to give political rights to women. In her speech, she states that both men and women are created equal and hence due to this equality women should have political rights too. Throughout her speech she emphasizes the discrimination against women, using the right to vote, the roles in marriage, and unequal wages as her evidence.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

How they couldn’t vote and how they didn’t have the rights that white men had. But throughout the whole speech, she is trying to convince people to start a big ordeal on how white men are not the only ones able to vote. In conclusion, the author is speaking to her fellow women and the to the wrong white men of the United States. Her purpose of making this speech is that woman have just as much right to vote as white men do.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

In 1986 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Elie Wiesel, makes two strong statements in his acceptance speech. Wiesel was 15 years old when he entered the camp in Auschuitz. His mom and little sister got killed as soon as they got to the gates. His father went into the gates with him the first time. He moved in January 1945 to Buchenwald in a cattle car.

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

In her speech she continues to say, “And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republic government -- the ballot.” (Anthony,1)

Read More
1168 Words | 5 Pages

This movement not only involved with white suffragists, but also with the black suffragists; the whole event was concentrating on sex and racial equality. "As Stanton consistently put it, the republican lesson of the war was that popular sovereignty, the equal political rights of all individuals, preceded and underlay government and nations.... The belief that the right to vote was the individual 's natural right made the case for woman suffrage much stronger." (Dubois, 91) Stanton believed that through the lesion of equal political rights and individual’s natural right made the woman suffrage even stronger.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

Susan B. Anthony, a woman who was arrested for illegally voting in the president election of 1872, in her “On Women's Right to Vote” speech, argues that women deserve to be treated as citizens of America and be able to vote and have all the rights that white males in America have. She begins by introducing her purpose, then provides evidence of how women are citizens of America, not just males by using the preamble of the Constitution, then goes on about the how this problem has became a big problem and occurs in every home in the nation, and finally states that women deserve rights because the discrimination against them is not valid because the laws and constitutions give rights to every CITIZEN in America. Anthony purpose is to make the woman of America realize that the treatment and limitations that hold them back are not correct because they are citizens and they deserve to be treated like one. She adopts a expressive and confident tone to encourage and light the hearts of American woman. To make her speech effective, she incorporates ethos in her speech to support her claims and reasons.

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

Woman Suffrage Women's right activist, Carrie Catt, in her speech, “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, explains how woman suffrage in inevitable. Catt’s purpose is to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. She adopts a confident tone , uses direct quotations, and appeals to logos in order to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. A confident tone is adopted by Catt throughout her entire speech to congress. Catt opens with “Woman suffrage is inevitable.”

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

For a very long time, the voting rights of the citizens have been a problem in the US. It started out with only men with land being able to vote, and then expanded to white men, and then to all men. However, women were never in the situation, they were disregarded and believed to not be worthy enough to have the same rights as men. They were essentially being treated as property, therefore having no rights. But, in Susan B. Anthony’s speech, she hits upon the point that women are just as righteous as men.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

This piece of evidence shows that Elie rebelled against the SS to be with his father, which takes tremendous courage. Furthermore, in the earlier chapters of Wiesel’s novel he was beaten by a Kapo named Idek because he was in a bad mood. A French woman showed courage by giving Elie a mini speech in perfect German, a language no one knew she spoke, in order to pass off as an Aryan. Years later they meet

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Nowadays our world is changing hourly – its political, social and economic global picture depends on the decisions (more or less important, but still important), which are taken every minute. Sometimes it seems that all significant events have taken place, moreover it was a long time ago. At the same time we forget that there are areas of life, our daily lives, which have been completely different recently. In modern Western societies the right to receive education and to vote for women is natural part of life, contrast to the Third world counties, where women still do not have opportunity to take part in decision-making and influence various spheres of life in their countries. Skeptics may wonder: “What is so special about the fact that women are allowed to vote?”

Read More

More about The Perils Of Indifference Speech Similarities And Differences

Related Topics

Open Document