Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justification of atom bombs
Justification of atom bombs
Justification of atom bombs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justification of atom bombs
Justification of atom bombs
Justification of atom bombs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Japanese were ruthless and brutal when it came to their militaristic decisions and motives. Dropping the atomic bomb was our final hope in stopping them from performing further harm. Either way, lives were going to be taken. The question we must ask ourselves is whether we wanted those lives to be those of Americans or the Japanese. President Truman had to make a vital decision, and using nuclear warfare was the only way to stop Japan without killing American soldiers.
The other argument was that the United States should not have bombed Japan. People believed this because the atomic bomb was considered by some to be a crime against humanity. Some citizens believe that the bomb should
This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.
The doubts about the U.S. decision in 1945 have been discussed, analyzed, and there are still many controversies. In August 1945, the U.S. decided to use both of its two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war between them during WWII. The atomic bomb has killed about 200,000 people in the Japanese community and brought destruction to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even though the bomb had terminated the war by Japan surrendering, there were many who were against the action of using the bomb. The reason behind that perspective is that many innocent people have died, and Japan was near surrendering, so there was no need for a major event.
A former Ohio representative, Dennis Kucinich in the web article, We Didn’t Have to Drop The Bomb published on the 70th anniversary of the Japan bombings addresses the topic of the use of the atomic bomb and passionately argues that the use of nuclear weapons were not necessary in order to capitulate Japan by listing many quotes from high ranking government officials and giving his own personal opinion. Kucinich supports his claim by using factual quotes from credible sources such as Admiral William Leahy, who believed in that Japan would have surrendered without the use of atom head of staff; therefore, proving to the audience that others also believe in his cause. The author’s overall purpose of writing this article is to persuade the American
“Dropping the atomic bombs on Japan saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of U.S. soldiers and some believed it was the only way to end the war quickly.” in Dropping the A-Bomb Saved Lives. As a result of dropping the bomb Japan lost lives of soldiers, civilians and land. Japan also lost power in their government because of the bombs, and many business, houses got destroyed and created some tension between the governments. The U.S. only had a few choices since Japan wouldn't surrender the U.S. had to do something.
In Document 2, Admiral Leahy says, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” Some Americans felt as though the weapon should not have been used because the Japanese were ready to give in. COME BACK Not only were the Japanese ready to surrender but it was morally wrong to bomb multiple cities without realizing what the outcomes may be.
was not justified in dropping the bomb on Japan. In the first place, the bombing was not meant to be a harmful weapon, instead it was meant to protect people. According to the article, when the bomb was created, the purpose of it was to be a deterrent and to intimidate other countries, so they would not attack the U.S. This proves how the bomb was supposed to be a defensive weapon for any possible attack on the U.S.. In addition, the bombing was an inhumane to do.
The decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified because, in war, death will happen no matter what, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with Pearl Harbor, they had it
However, this is a weak defence when taking Japan’s imminent defeat and peace efforts, as well as the likelihood of Japan’s surrender before the land invasion, into consideration. Furthermore, the usage of the bombs only accelerated the surrender of an already defeated enemy and resulted in high civilian casualty rates. This, along with the ulterior motives in the bomb’s usage, undermines any kind of justification even further. The usage of the atomic bombs was both highly immoral and militarily unnecessary, and had no function in bringing the war to an
Critics have stated that Truman’s decision was an act of barbarism that brought upon long-term negative ramifications to the United States. A new generation of nuclear terror led to a desperate competition of who has the biggest and baddest nuclear weapon. Some military analysts dictate that Japan was already on the verge of surrendering and the decision to drop the bombs was simply unnecessary (The Decision to Drop the Bomb.). Some even accused the Unites States government of racism on the premise that we would have never used such a terrifying weapon against white civilians. Other critics argue that U.S diplomats had other motives.
Imagine the sudden loss of 70,000 lives: 70,000 futures obliterated, 70,000 bodies decimated, and 70,000 families grieving. That was the impact of the bombing of Hiroshima. Similar results happened at Nagasaki. The decision of whether or not the United States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been heavily debated for decades. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima was not a military necessity because there were other options, it was ethically wrong, and the United States was already winning.
Imagine a world where World War 2 took two more years, four million more people died, and the U.S. didn’t drop the atomic bomb. All of this would have happened if we didn’t drop the atomic bomb when we did. The U.S. did the right thing by dropping the bomb because if we didn’t drop it more lives would have been lost, we would have ran out of supplies, and finally Japan attacked the U.S. first with zero warning. Many people think the atomic bomb shouldn’t have been dropped but our group thinks it was necessary to do to save our country. - Ben First, the U.S. should have dropped the bomb on Japan because without the bomb, more lives could have been lost from both sides.
The US used the A-bomb to save its soldier, which could have been lost. Japan planning to surrender to the Russian but only if there can keep their emperor making The atomic bomb pointless. With many military leaders on point, agreeing that dropping the atomic bomb was unnecessary. Only president Truman could have made the choice to try to save American lives but in saving them, he will be kill millions of innocent people. Imagined being in President Truman shoes try to make the choice of whether or not to press the big red
My argument is that I am for the decision of the atomic bomb drop on Japan. The atomic bomb save millions of American lives that stop them from doing D-Day-style on Japanese homeland and islands. These island invasion cost a lot of American casualties, and the Japanese soldiers are willing and very determine fight to the death. They see suicide as an honorable alternative to surrender. The whole population of Japan are willing to die to fight the Americans, if the U.S. didn’t dropped the bomb on Japan, then the war will dragged on and the Americans will lose a lot of casualties and Japan will lose almost all the population.