More handpicked essays just for you.
Should police officers wear body cameras essay
Should police officers wear body cameras essay
Why should the police wear body cams
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The first thing to consider is that cameras do not eliminate bias and multiple interpretations of the footage based on the viewer. As the footage will only show the situation from the first person viewpoint of the officer leading to a specific framing of the event. This could become a major concern during court trials considering that reliance on video recordings for evidence will greatly increase as body cameras become more standard in the police force. This will create a need for a documented chain of custody and secure storing for possibly hundreds of hours of footage recorded daily. That will need to be sorted, saved, or deleted as necessary.
Having a body camera recording all the time would not be very practical, but it would still capture everything that the officer does; holding them responsible for everything they do. Some could argue that there would have to be some instances where officers could turn the cameras off, but if the officers would be allowed to turn the cameras off they could get away with dreadful deeds. Body cameras could also be seen as an invasion of privacy, but nothing a police officer does while on the job should be private. As well as everyday behavior, the cameras would catch footage of defendants being arrested. The defendants may not wish to be recorded during these moments, but if they did not wish to be recorded they should not have committed a crime.
Additionally, it will protect officers from any false accusations. Secondly, having the cameras will instill trust. On several occasions, people have been killed by officers and the community started to lose trust in them. Now with a camera
Another child has lost their life to senseless violence and the officers have been slapped on the wrist. Body cams can prevent a tragedy and aid officers in building a better community and protect their image. Not only that the body cams are the only way officers can improve on the daily. Body cams are a way to prevent unneeded violence in the community and get the truth. The cams will allow every detail of the event to be recorded and played back.
Such videos like the videos recorded by dash cams in law enforcement vehicles get posted up to youtube all the time for everyone to see, and now with body cameras, more personal, up-close videos will be recorded and posted online. (Pearce, 2014). Supporters also argue that there are many advantages for law enforcement to be equipped with a body camera Including, more transparency on police and civilian interactions, and it is also beneficial for everyone on both parties, so civilians, cops, and the courts can see exactly what happened before, during, and after the interaction. Additionally, decisions made by law enforcement in the line of duty can also be reviewed by courts to ensure that the police officers are abiding by the same laws that they are enforcing. The cold hard evidence of a video immediately eliminates any possible lies brought by the citizen, the cop, or a witness who saw the
This will help the jury decide what happend so they can get more information on what to do about the case. According to thehill.com 88 percent of Americans believe that police should be wearing body cameras on them while working for safety. Why do body cameras help These body cameras help the jury by collecting enough footage of the case so that there is information to show what had happened. Wearing body cameras prevent costly lawsuits and help the police officers.
So many lives could be saved and so many police officers’ careers could be saved through the utilization of this idea and the reaping of its benefits. Whether it captures a citizen attack on a police officer or whether it captures a case of police brutality, the great possibilities outweigh the potential cons of police body cameras and make them a risk worth taking. Whether one takes the side of the citizens and believe the police are typically irrational or one takes the side of the police and believe they are only doing their jobs to the best of their ability, the incorporation of body cameras to the controversial police force would be extremely beneficial for
It will give everyone clear footage, and protect both the officer and everyone else. The footage given through the
Body cameras help address issues with inappropriate police behavior and police brutality. According to the article, “Body Cameras Worn by Police Officers Are No ‘Safeguard of Truth,’ Experts Say”, One officer in Phoenix, Arizona was fired after his body camera captured repeated incidents of unprofessional conduct. The video shows the officer swearing at suspects, calling them names, and insulting them. Continuously wearing body cameras would hold police accountable for their appropriate and inappropriate conduct. Body cameras could prevent cases like the Ferguson shooting.
After the police brutality attacks that have become quite popular and common within the United States, the affirmative action, requiring all police to wear body cameras, see that this procedure will alleviate and hopefully eliminate all counts of police brutality. These body cameras will be instituted to protect both parties since “the arguments in favor of police body-cams are simple. The videos would offer an accurate and unbiased record of exactly what occurred in each officer’s shift,” (Klabin, 2015). In order to protect our citizens, police officers have been entrusted with the immense responsibility of having the authority to use force within certain circumstances. But we are not being protected.
First, is letting the community know what the police are doing. Another, to find truth or false statements or accusations. First, of all, body cameras can show the community what the police are doing. First, if the community wants to know what the police are doing, body cameras are a great way to show it.
The video footage would not only be available to the community but to ourselves so we will be able to view our actions from the perspective that everyone else sees us. The footage captured from the body cameras is what Smith refers to as the impartial spectator that is always monitoring the behaviors from both citizens and police officers. Public access to footage from body cameras would also serve as a deterrence to excessive force from all parties. This as Smith states will allow for people to act virtuous at all times as they will need to be in control of their actions as they would always be monitored. Public access would also ultimately lead to what Bentham referred to as discipline that could be internalized in all situations not only those related to police encounters.
The use of previous videos can be detrimental to new cops because it can teach them how to deal with many different situations correctly that way they don’t put their career in jeopardy or the lives of their partners in danger. Everyone knows that there is always three sides to a story: what one individual says happens, what the other individual says happened, and what happened. With the execution of body-worn cameras, it would eliminate, the reduction seen in complaints filed and sustained against officers and videos can reduce the need for lengthy
It will give everyone clear footage, and protect both the officer and everyone else. The footage given through the past few years has been grainy and not good enough to see the things that need to be seen to help find out the truth. By wearing a body camera it can be filmed in real time. Other footage is given on smart phones, and can be edited to take out some of the footage to make it seem like the truth. Everyone will actually see the truth about what goes
“Although it was a crucial part of humans’ survival 100,000 years ago, hunting is now nothing more than a violent form of recreation.” (“Sport Hunting Is an Unnecessary Form”). Some feel that hunting for sport is enjoyable and a fun activity, while others find that it’s an arrogant and selfish form of murder. Sport hunting is unacceptable; it robs the animals of their habitats, decreases the population of the animals, and is simply inhumane.
