ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Chemical Warfare

729 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Thesis for ww2 chemical warfare

Chemical warfare is different from the use of conventional weapons or nuclear weapons because the destructive effects of chemical weapons are not primarily due to any explosive force. (Wikipedia the free encyclopedia) It has been known that the use of chemical warfare dates back to Ancient times. Ancient Greek myths about Hercules poisoning his arrows with the venom of the “Hydra monster” are the earliest references to toxic weapons in Western literature. The importance of getting these chemical weapons away is so that they can’t turn and use them against my country and home. With the right amount of chemical based weapons they can destroy an entire city instead of just setting off small bombs. We as the United States need to find a way to …show more content…

(IBN CNN LIVE ) I don’t want my country to sit back idly and let this continue because before I know it this war can be dropped on my front porch. This is a country that has no remorse, they don’t care about how gruesome and they even go to points where they send videos of horrible actions like killing and beheading people. (IRAQINEWS.COM) They also have hacked into our government sites posting up things as important as our military and their families living areas and addresses. This battle has gone on long enough and its time that we find a way to end it. I think that we need to stop wanting to make peace or make a compromise with them and at least get them into a cease fire. I have stood back long enough and watched these people kill and destroy innocent human beings. I feel we need to go in there with more aggression and stop worrying about whose toes we are going to step on. We need to go to homes and question each person in these homes to see who will give up where most of the Isis group is hiding. We need to let all countries know if you are joining Isis assuming that you are joining a great cause you will be prosecuted as any other member of the Isis

Show More
Related
575 Words | 3 Pages

It is more focused on conveying the views of individuals and their political ramifications, rather than confronting the facts that were brought to lights only a year earlier by the same publication. This kind of writing is detrimental to history, because it chooses to skew the reader to one side rather than show both sides of the argument. Only a year earlier another author by the name of C.J. Chivers also wrote an article for the New York Times titled The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons which took first hand accounts of soldiers running into caches of chemical weapons buried in Iraq that date back to Saddam’s reign. In this article it states there are at the least six incidents in which soldier came into contact with chemical weapons caches and needed to be brought into a hospital for treatment.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

First off, not disagree with the decisions of the president to drop atomic bombs in Nagasaki, Hiroshima. The reason why I disagree with the atomic weapons that were drawn in japan is because there were thousand of people who were killed, innocent peoples who died in that bomb drops. there were military men who died, but at the same time is was acceptable for united states to fight, and win the war. United states were discomforted the lost thousand of people, including military, 48,000 people from the united states, military, and innocent peoples. It was grave that the united states had thousands of life that are why they proposed the attack besides japan.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

Chemical warfare was very dangerous and caused many deaths in WW1. There were three different types of gases used in battle mustard, chlorine, and tear gas which was the least deadly. Western nations had a treaty against poisonous weapons but the british broke the treaty when they deployed tear gas on german soldiers. Soon after German soldiers struck back with chlorine gas, which was very deadly if exposed to lungs or eyes. The french allies did not expect nor know how to prepare for a gas attacks.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

In 2013, 65% of Americans supported launching “airstrikes in other countries against suspected

Read More
1666 Words | 7 Pages

Chemical weapons are weapons that are used to induce mass destruction to many victims leaving them in a state of agony often resulting in death. Gas masks are used to provide some protection for the chemicals. Next, the destruction of the chemical weapon was very vast as can be seen through the death and the environmental changes. Chemical weapons may be any toxic chemical that can cause death, injury, temporary incapacitation or sensory irritation through its chemical action. In Remarque’s

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Chemical warfare contributed to less than 1% of deaths in World War 1. Ottoman Empire introduced gas warfare to the Gallipoli battle in August 1915, but it wasn't effective. The Allies also attempted gas warfare later in September, but it had limited success. Overall, gas warfare failed and caused many casualties for both and was banned at the end of the

Read More
2139 Words | 9 Pages

At the same time, many Americans are exhausted, resigned, demoralized. Our military forces—mighty, brave, determined—were sent into Afghanistan and Iraq, two winnable wars that became quagmires. Materially, the Islamists are far weaker than the enemies we faced in World War II. Then, we eliminated the threat to our lives and freedom in less than five years. Since 9/11, however, we’ve been told that this must be a “long war.”

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Should the U.S. have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Some people believe that the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan, while others believe that the U.S. did the right thing by dropping the bombs. One thing both sides should agree upon is that the atomic bombs dropped on Japan ended the war faster than it would have if the U.S. did not drop the bombs. The atomic bombing on Japan was necessary for the war to end because it stopped the fighting and additional casualties that would have occurred if the war had not ended. The U.S. did the right thing by dropping the atomic bombs because they prevented the additional casualties that would have occurred.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Ana Cecilia Viana Miss Nardi ENG1D1-h 6 June 2023 The concept of speaking up and its relevance in The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas Speaking up is something that may come easily to some but not to others. It is something many know they have to do but do not do it because of fear. In the novel, The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas, Starr Carter discovers that using her voice will strengthen her fight for justice in her community because she learns that speaking up promotes inclusivity, confidence, and a more educated society.

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

The United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, on August 6th and August 9th of 1945, respectively. This event resulted in the death of an estimated 200,000 Japanese people, a lot of which were civilians, and it remains as one of the most controversial topics in world history. People are divided on the belief that it was necessary or that it was unnecessary, each with their own valid points to back up their reasoning, yet, the bombing of Japan had more pros than cons and therefore was most definitely a necessary action in World War II. Most view the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese as the reason for the bombing of Japan, there are a multitude of overlooked factors that were also partially the cause of the

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

One way of warfare during WWI was chemical warfare. Chemical warfare was first used when gas was just released from large cylinders and carried by the air and wind into enemy lines. This eventually evolved and other gases were loaded into the shells The shells were then blasted into other enemies trenches and forts. People did wear gas masks to try and protect themselves from the gases but soldiers could not fight as hard with a gas mask on their face. Another type of warfare used during World War I was trench warfare.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Today the the effects of toxic gas in warfare ripple throughout our culture. Most countries condone the use of chemical warfare, and rarely is it seen being used

Read More
368 Words | 2 Pages

It differs from person to person and it’s based on what they see is morally right or wrong. We as a society could and do base almost all our morals on the greatest good for the greater amount of people, otherwise known as majority rules. However, I find there are flaws in that system of thinking. To say that the greater amount of people get what they want due to the fact that the amount of people in one group surpasses the amount in another, seems illogical.

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

According to the FBI website, and under the 18 U.S.C. §2332a, weapons of mass destruction constitute disease organisms, radioactive material or anything made to disperse radiation, explosives, gaseous poisons, and toxins/chemicals (WMD, 2017). There have been numerous definitions for the concept of weapons of mass destruction each with a different twist that makes it suitable for whichever agency it is

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, the International communities should renew and reinforce the regulations of chemical weapons immediately, because until now there are some countries still use chemical weapons to face their wars and internal conflicts, although they are the members of the Chemical Weapons

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Chemical Warfare

Related Topics

Open Document