Meyer, a social scientist, that did a report on income that involved “paternity fathers”. He noticed that after a father’s income increased from paternity establishment after several years. He failed to realize that the child support collection policy was based off of fiscal considerations, leaving a major flaw in his report. Instead of helping with income, the child support collection policy made it harder for parents that had a child outside of marriage to make money. The report also fails to address the cost efficiency of child support collection and the diminishing returns for enforcement against absent parents with little to no income.
You are a male worker of a retail store that satisfies your current way of life. Generating around eight to twelve dollars an hour. After finding out your spouse is pregnant, your expenses on food supply increases. A few months later, your housing and utility bills arrive, eventually your auto bills are in the mail and you still have to file your taxes. That one job you have been working for isn’t meeting the requirements thus you decide on getting a secondary job at starbucks.
AO4 - Government responses to social issues and welfare needs Introduction Tony Blair came into power in 1999, he then declared that child poverty should be eradicated from the UK by the year 2020. The Child Poverty Act was introduced and recognised in 2010; it was made legislation to meet four targets for child poverty by 2020. These targets are to reduce the amount of children living in relative poverty to less than 10%, the second target is to reduce the amount of children that live in a low income household and material deprivation to less than 5%, the third target is to reduce the amount of children suffering from persistent poverty and lastly, to reduce the amount of children living in absolute poverty to less than 5%. The legislation involves the state considering a new child poverty strategy every three years, where policies are set to attempt to meet the targets established. Child poverty fell to 2.3 million in 2010/11, however this did not meet the Governments target of halving child poverty, this number remained consistent up until 2012/13 (Kennedy, 2014).
Yes, they will have the money to feed and care for these children, but having a loving and caring environment is also a major thing for children. If a child has an unstable home, has a mother that is unfit to care the him/her, or lives in a dangerous environment that would create a bigger conflict. Bruenig is making seem like if low-income mothers are given this allowance they would be able to take care of their child and that their only option would be taking this allowance and not having an abortion which can cause some trouble in these women’s lives. Financial stability should be taken into account, but the home that the child would be living in should also be questioned. Many low-income mothers-to-be can’t provide shelter for their babies therefore putting the babies at risk.
There is a startling 17.6% of youth under 18 in poverty (Baca Zinn, 2009, p. 195). The younger the child is the greater the probability of living in poverty is for them. Children in working poor households tend to have their parents more absent from their life. Working poor parents have to make ends meet, even if that means working day and night. This is an even more prominent problem for single parents because this means they need to find another source of childcare.
This amount arranges almost 50% of all households’ poverty. Furthermore living in poverty is 6% in the single aged person family, 4% in the aged couple family and 7% in the
Often times, these are attributed to poverty. According to the 2005 census, 17.6% of children are living in poverty. The rate increases to 42% for children raised by single mothers (DeNavas-Walt, 2010). Policymakers and researchers have long recognized that low income families are substantially more likely to come in
According to Hodgkinson et al, there are “disparities in poverty rates depending on age, race or ethnicity, family structure, and geographic location. Although the largest number of poor and low income children are white, minority children are disproportionately affected, particularly African American, American Indian, and Hispanic children. In 2013, Hispanic and African American children were ~3 times more likely than white and Asian children to be poor. Children raised by single parents and children raised in the South or West are also more likely to be poor or low income than children residing in the Northeast” (Hodgkinson et al, 2016). Children and youth are a vulnerable population because they have no control over their situation or environment;
In the article, “Changing the Face of Poverty” it is stated that “more than [thirty-five] million Americans – one out of every seven – are officially poor. More than one in five American children are poor and the poor are getting poorer.” (George 676) Among racial and ethnic groups, African Americans had the highest poverty rate, followed by Hispanics and whites. According to The State of Working America, 45.8 percent of young black children live in poverty, compared to 14.5 percent of white children.
According to the PBS Frontline video “Poor Kids” 2012, more than 46 million Americans are living beneath the poverty line. The United States alone has one of the highest rates of child poverty in the industrialized world. It is stated that 1 out of 5 children are living in poverty. The video documented the lives of three families who are faced with extreme hardships and are battling to survive a life of being poor. All three families have more than one child and could barely afford to pay their bills and purchase food for their household.
When a child is living in poverty there are many values and principles which need to be underpinned. The child must always be put first and their opinions must always be considered. The child is going to know what they want so they should always be asked first. The child’s rights should always be promoted. When working in partnership with the child’s parents, their contributions should always be respected, sometimes the parents contributions can help benefit the child the most because they know the most about their child.
As our economy, family dynamics, poverty levels, and population changes, there is a need for social changes as well. Programs aimed at poverty should be evaluated on a constant basis to ensure they continuously meet the needs of the public. The poverty level must
McKeen (2006) explains that the framework of the current child welfare approaches was directed from the dominant discourse of ‘national children’s agenda’ initiatives. Since then, there have been many major changes happened in the mainstream social policy in child welfare sector. The national and global political influences and world economic pressure forces federal and provincial governments to control the social security and welfare programs and it reflects in child welfare system too (McKeen, 2006). Politics in Canada has a serious notion on key ideologies while restructuring child welfare policies (McKeen, 2006). Ontario’s Child and Family service Act 1984, was developed on the principle of minimal family intervention with a view that children need to be protected in their own homes (Dumbrill, 2006b).
Child Poverty in the U.S About nine months after conception, newborns come out of the wombs and come to the world. The newborns must be the most beautiful gift the mothers have ever received. It is always moved that the mothers finally see their babies after have waited for long time. The newborns start their new journey in the world. Meanwhile, the babies will embody tomorrow’s world.
The children are greatest gift of almighty to humanity and personal as well as public assets. The young people are the foundation of the society because the future achievement of the society lies in their hands. The period of youth is mostly an important because the manner and values formed during this time may be fixed for the rest of one’s life. The outline of the future human society shall be determined by their mental and physical well-beings. The Children (young people) should be allowed and provided likelihood to grow up to become robust and obedient citizens, physically well, psychologically alert and morally healthy, capable with skills and activations needed by the society at large.
