The Pros And Cons Of Climate Change

One of the most talked about issues in the world today is climate change. Climate change poses as a huge problem because of its many impacts that endangers our world everyday, such as, lifting water levels, putting wildlife at risk, endangering human health, and many more. There are various campaigns that are trying to find solutions to permanently put this issue to rest. This essay aims to argue that at this point in time nuclear energy is the best solution to the problems caused by climate change. Firstly, this essay will demonstrate the issues that are triggered by climate change. Then, it will move on to explain the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing nuclear energy as a solution to these problems. After that it will suggest alternative

Presently there is adequate confirmation that these climatic changes have Impacted the world in great measures. One of the many examples of these impacts is the effects of climate change on human health. the World Health Organization appraises that approximately 150,000 lives have been lost every year for the past 30 years due to the changes in the temperature. There are numerous human diseases that have been connected to the change in climate, from cardiovascular mortality and respiratory illnesses because of heatwaves, to adjusted transmission of infectious diseases ( Patz et al. , 2005). That is only one of the many reasons that climate change is considered to be a major issue that needs to be

The use of nuclear energy can be very beneficial to our world in various aspects. Firstly, the use of nuclear energy does not discharge any CO2, which in turn makes it highly more beneficial to the environment ( Dresselhaus & Thomas, 2001). Another advantage of using nuclear energy as source is that it has low operating costs and that it is considered relatively safe. Huge nuclear reactor merchants have created adjusted reactors that offer both enhanced security and lower expenses. One of the inventive plans being the pebble bed modular reactor (PBMR) created by the south African utility ESKOM. The key idea of the configuration was to develop a plant that has no physical procedure which can bring out a radiation affected hazard outside the site limit. Therefore the possibility of it being a "core melt " situation is along the lines of zero. With the capital expense of creating ten modules being at approximately $1000-1200/KWe, it is considered to be the cheapest and safest design ( Sims, Rogner & Gregory, 2003). Another reason that indicates that nuclear energy is the best solution is that unlike other alternative such as solar and wind, nuclear energy reactors do not need a ton of space. Hence, nuclear energy does not have any geographical