ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Drone Warfare

478 Words2 Pages

The advancement I am looking at today is that of Unmanned warfare of as I have heard it said “The next best thing to dying there”. This is the concept of drone warfare. The use of a system that remote the risk to the soldier but still is effective in combat. The most known use of this advancement is the UAV systems like the “Predator” Drones. So first the benefits: A way to engage in conflict without placing your armed forces in harm's way, Using this advancement the combatant in charge of the unmanned weapon can be safe in a bunker on the other side of the world. Thus decreasing the physical risk to the combatant. The advancements needed to carry out this kind of operation are vast, real-time feeds to and from the control system to the weapon. The system to …show more content…

The advancement in this field has and is bringing advancements into many aspects of the daily lives of people around the world. Like the low drone monitoring of crops to find over watering and sending data to control the watering of crops to get the best yield. Now onto the negative impacts: On impact is the same as all new weapons of war, indiscriminate killing, miss use, and carelessness. Indiscriminate killing is perhaps the most negative impact. This could be due to the detachment of the act of killing or the fact that the death is so far from the person. This type of weapon is ripe for misuse and carelessness due to its very nature of being out of sight and out of mind of the populace in general. When you can hide killing it is a place where those looking to gain power or dominion over another group. A more insidious impact might be the desensitization of the people that carry out the use of the weapon thus causing post-traumatic stress, That is unseen to the community at large. What can we do to decrease the impact of this advancement? One we could place very clear rules and oversight on the use of this weapon

Show More
Related
569 Words | 3 Pages

safer by decimating terrorist networks across the world. Drones kill fewer civilians, as a percentage of total fatalities, than any other military weapon. Drone strikes are legal under international law. These are all points that get one thinking that drones are okay, but little do they know that there are thousands of innocent lives being killed by strikes that weren’t even supposed to be attacking them. The voters for using drones don’t fully know what’s on the other side of using them, if we use them this will trigger many people, victims of ones who got hit on accident and more.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

The War on Terror was effective. It improved security and made U.S. citizens safer against terrorism around the world. President George Bush worked to counter terrorist threats, and stop threats within the U.S. He implemented a foreign policy against terrorism around the world, improving homeland security. In Do Not Take the War on Terror’s Big Success for Granted, they show the success that the U.S. had.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

Another strategy of keeping dangerous guns from murdering truthful people is to boycott a whole kind of weapon. The AK-47 is a common illustration of that. Once more, the criminals still have restricted access to the weapon through underground markets, yet these banned weapons are powerful to the point that there is truly no reason for them in the homes or used for hunting. This can without much of a stretch be adverted by the regular criminal who knows anything about the way firearms are collected.

Read More
188 Words | 1 Pages

I choose topic B. My answer is: proceeding with the drone strike is the best choice regarding the severe juggernaut terrorism has inflicted on innumerable citizens, especially in the Middle East. Furthermore, according to the Washington Times, drone strikes conducted by the United States during a 5-month-long campaign in Afghanistan caused the deaths of unintended targets nearly nine out of ten times, which means the authority has always prioritized eliminating terrorism. Concerning the position as President of the United States of Barack Obama, he has escalated forces in Afghanistan, embraced the widespread use of unmanned drones to kill terrorists at the risk of civilian casualties, kept Guantánamo open, and killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

If we want Unconventional Warfare (UW) to be successful, many entities must invest. The investment is initially paid through the educational foundation and vested interest of SOF (including SF personnel and support enablers), policy makers (including top Army officials and political officials), and the Intelligence Community (IC). SOF works on the tactical level of a mission, but their influence can reach to the staff (division) level of a resistance movement or insurgency. Since we are the bottom branch of the totem pole, we see and hear the pulse of a resistance. I believe we may have problems hearing this pulse due to 15 years of relentless war where we honed our ability to teach small unit tactics while disregarding the roles of the underground and auxiliary through preparation of the environment.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

This type of gun should remain for military use only and not be an easy access to the

Read More
1697 Words | 7 Pages

As we have seen, weapons are utilized as a part of an expansive number of wrongdoings. Be that as it may, how might we decrease the measure of weapons utilized as a part of perpetrating wrongdoing, while in the meantime keeping in place the privileges of the regular resident? One of the approaches to do this is require everybody who wishes to buy a firearm to take and pass a weapon wellbeing course. Many states that permit hid weapons require this kind of test before issuing grants. This would be a one-time test and would include a historical verification of the potential weapon purchaser.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Drone make America less safe “Evil comes on many colors” Our government is going out of hand with these drone strikes, killing many innocent civilians. Even though drone strikes puts America less safe, government should not use drone strikes because is creating a culture of fear and hatred and many innocent people are killed. Drone strikes puts America less safe “It’s true that when there’s a drone attack the terrorist are killed… But 500 or 5000 more people rise against it and more terrorism occurs.”

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

Military grade weapons are made for one reason and one reason only—to kill human beings. There is no reason for ordinary people to have access to this type of weaponry, especially semi-automatic rifles. More weapons, especially more semi-automatic weapons, does not mean less crime; semi-automatic weapons are not convenient for personal protection, and banning these weapons could help lower the number of mass shootings that occur in this country today. In 2016 alone, approximately 39,000 Americans were killed by guns, most of these deaths were caused by semi-automatic weapons (Lopez).

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

In this essay will discuss the pros and cons of drone warfare considering the current moral and ethical debate. It will firstly discuss what drones are, they’re pros and cons, and will cover several aspects linked to the current debates with regards to drone usage and the implications of either following correct procedures or using drones for illegitimate reasons. Autonomous weapons and their relation to drones will also be discussed. Drones can be described as machines which can operate without there having to be an individual manning them but they are operated with the use of remote controls by a pilot at a further destination. These pilots make decisions with regards to when they fire the weapons.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

A weapon in the wrongs hands is the maximum danger humanity can face. Nowadays, violence and delinquency in society are viewed as the maximum problem solver. Humanity is full of chaos; hate and envy seize our souls. Guns are the ultimate security for some citizens but for others, these add to a feeling of defenselessness. Throughout history, any topic related to guns means a plethora of problems.

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

Drones have killed over a total of 467 civilians in the past two years. All of these deaths were caused by a drone dysfunction. None of these accidents have ever received an apology from the drone operator or the president themselves. Drones are armed aircrafts used to protect the country. The fact is that Drones are not good at protecting the people inside this territory.

Read More
257 Words | 2 Pages

There is a high percentage of civilian casualties involved in the use of drones. While this is not a premium circumstance, sometimes there are no ways around such casualties. It truly is a shame and is unavoidable in many cases. When troops are boots on the ground to combat terrorism they will often suffer casualties and also cause civilian casualties within these compounds. Ergo, the drones are ultimately avoiding more causalities than necessary.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Recently, the controversy over the future of these weapons has sparked an interest in many debates, whether to allow them or outlaw them. The result of these disputes can affect our nation, so it is of the utmost importance to create an analytically acceptable solution. To this degree, it is critically important to properly implement a solution before causing an erroneous mistake. A reasonable approach to dealing with such arduous challenges is to properly understand its benefits and the risks that caused by this debatable, but

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

When we think about drone or UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), first thing comes to our mind is; frightening, alien looking unmanned aircraft that has been involved with so many bombings and targeted killings. In “Drone Home: What Happens When Drones Return to America”, from Time, Lev Grossman wrote drones are dreaded all around the globe, and possibly they have gotten this fear through the United States Military. Drone technology has been greatly improved last decade, now third of entire Air Force’s fleet is unmanned. U.S Government is sending drones to many war zones to eliminate high-ranking enemies or do surveillance successfully. Even though this rapidly growing technology is changing our perspective of war, it also changing our everyday life drastically to help our community.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Drone Warfare

Related Topics

Open Document