ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Entrenchment

1050 Words5 Pages

Entrenching a charter of rights into the constitution violates the fundamental principles of democracy because it reduces the likelihood that it can be changed. Entrenchment can be defined as establishing something so firmly that it is very unlikely that it can or will be altered. Democracy can be defined as ruling by the people; citizens of a country that are eligible will vote a selected representative to run the federal, provincial, or municipal government. Democracy is about change as the people want it and, by entrenching the charter of rights into the constitution, the government is essentially revoking the citizens right to vote on specific issues regardless of what the people of the country want.

Some people may argue that entrenchment …show more content…

The second is a proportionality analysis in three parts. Once the government passes the first part of the test where they decide if it is pressing and substantial, they must go through a proportionality analysis. First they have to decide if limiting the individuals right is rational in relation to the purpose, for example, it would be unfair to limit a person’s right if they were charged with a smaller crime. If it is not proportionate to the crime, it does not pass the test. The second step of the second part is minimal impairment; this means that the government can only limit the right as little as possible. The last part states that the crime committed and the goal of limiting the right must be proportionate (Dyzenhaus, Reibetanz, Ripstein, …show more content…

Section 33 allows the government to override any rights outlined in section 2 for an amount of time no longer than five years (Johansen, Rosen, 2008). In the simplest terms, this is sufficient to overcome entrenchment being anti-democratic because this clause means that the charter is not written in stone, it can be changed for up to five years. After the five years, however, it can be renewed indefinitely (McAdam, 2009). If the population of a country wants change in the charter for whatever reason, for example gay marriage, the notwithstanding clause allows it which is a democratic

Show More
Related
1393 Words | 6 Pages

“Why should we change a constitution that has served and continues to serve us well?” (Dahl 2003). This question was deeply challenged in the book, How Democratic Is the American Constitution? by Robert Dahl. In his book, Robert Dahl analyzes the United States Constitution, revealing its potential antidemocratic aspects, and arguing for greater political equality among citizens.

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

The only difference in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms from the Bill of Rights

Read More
1907 Words | 8 Pages

In the 1800s, calls for change erupted from the public after numerous events broadcasted what mismanagement of natural resources can lead to. In 1871, the Peshtigo Fire in Wisconsin sent a message to the public that change was necessary, which was further reinforced through the after effects of smoke filled skies of industrial areas and degraded lands once beautiful now overgrazed to their roots. The cries of the public rendered new initiatives calling for better management of natural resources, as well as valuing these resources at more appropriate levels. These changes lead to the birth of conservation and preservation, and through this the means for advocates like George Catlin, John Muir, George Marsh and Theodore Roosevelt are provided for gaining public support for new management.

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

The Bill of Rights, the document that gives us our rights, and helped formed today’s society. But it wasn’t always as spread out and fundamental as it is today. Over the years, the Supreme Court has extended our rights in many ways. The Miranda vs. Arizona and Gideon vs. Wainright are just a few examples of the Bill of Rights’ extension. First and foremost, the Amendments addressing rights related to court weren’t always fundamental, but were only in use for federal hearings.

Read More
366 Words | 2 Pages

“...nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...” (pp. 28 & 671). This is to ensure peoples protection over their rights. Due process “a course of formal proceedings (as legal proceedings) carried out regularly and in accordance with established rules and principles”

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution Act of 1982 was exceedingly important in reshaping Canada’s constitutional arrangements. It consists of seven parts, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Aboriginal Rights, and Constitutional Amendment Rights. The Act codified and affirmed common-law rights based on centuries of British judicial precedent and statutes. It served as a solid foundation for the judiciary’s reviewing of legislative and executive actions, and allowed Canada to change its constitution without the approval of the British Parliament. Most importantly, the Act finally put an end to the Canadian parliamentary supremacy that was extant before the Act was entrenched, which granted the legislative branch the utmost sovereignty over all

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, an article written by Robert Rector, Katherine Bradley, and Rachel Sheffield for the Heritage Foundation, states that all means-tested from federal and state sources combined were $956 billion. This $956 billion in annual welfare spending is distributed among as many as 100 million people which average about $9,500 per beneficiary. I am in agreement with the article in Discover the Networks intitled; “The Welfare States’s cost to American Taxpayers” that says, “If converted entirely to cash, these benefits equal more than five times the amount of money needed to lift every poor person in the United States out of poverty” (2012). The Federal Income Tax returns filed in the United States is approximately 143 million.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Civic Reflection Issue 1- Change in Point of View The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights which outlines and protects the basic rights and fundamental freedoms that all Canadians have. These include the fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, equality rights, language rights, and Aboriginal and treaty rights. The Canadian Charter of Rights is extremely important to the citizens of Canada as it has given important meaning to the protection of our rights. It makes sure that minorities and vulnerable groups are protected through equality rights.

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

The Bill of Rights gave Americans basic rights as a citizen of the United States and showed them that the government can’t take away these natural rights. Without the Bill of Rights, the government could do whatever they wanted to the citizens because the Constitution did not state the rights of the American people. To conclude, the new Constitution created more flaws than benefits for Americans. Although it did help America unite as one nation, it also could’ve fixed simple errors that we have today. The new Constitution made the national government too strong, it gave the President too much power, and it didn’t include a Bill of

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

This corrupt system as some refer to it has many people confused and wondering what benefits are for Canadians. A specific case of the Charter being ineffective is the case Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

He explains that only when the legislature does not act in the best interest of its citizens or if they “endeavour to invade the property of the subject,” do the citizens have grounds for rebellion (). Following from the previous paragraph, when governments attempt to address inequality without the expressed consent of the governed, they may be dissolved. Focusing so singularly on the protection of property and therefore the protection of inequality will directly contrast with

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

None of the results from the quiz surpies me one bit, our society if buildt upon capitilism, which is meant for the few to successed while others must fail. Which lead to other social problems that are country failes to do anthing about it due to our political differences. Just looking at the high unemployement rate of younger people of color and people ask why is crime higer and education lower in those typical area, well someone has to fail and usually it's the poor and if their poor and a person of color there's less emphases on fix the issues, which in turn work for lower wages with less benefits and the corperations pay less and increase their profit margins. More so, the people who are working thoese low wage jobs have a difficult time

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

Their focus did not adequately pertain to the actual implementation of these laws. He places emphasis upon the relationship to democracies. He details how in a democracy, it is ruled by all the population, and people elected by them. It is thus full of compromises.

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

1) Government may intervene in a market in order to try and restore economic efficiency. One of the ways the government intervention can help overcome market failure is through the introduction of a price floors and price ceilings. If prices are seen to be too high, price ceiling or a maximum price could be imposed on a market in order to moderate the price of the product. This policy is often used when there are concerns that consumers cannot afford an essential product, such as groceries. The effect of a maximum price could create a shortage as it could lead to demand exceeding supply for that particular good.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

This means that citizens can vote for different rules and laws so people are equal. If there were no rights certain people would suffer more from not being able to do things such as not being able to drive, or having to do things such as going to military training, but if everyone agrees you may be able to change laws and rules by voting. This is in order to live a happy life. Another reason to be civilized is so the

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Entrenchment

Related Topics

Open Document