ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Federal Censorship

1377 Words6 Pages

Federal Censorship Needs to End Censorship in the United States has gone too far. Censorship is the practice of preventing access to information. This can be the removal of media to silencing individuals who are promoting ideas. The United States Government needs to restrict what it is censoring because it is a violation of its citizens first amendment rights, not censoring promotes free speech, and censoring anything can have negative effects on the citizens of the United States.
When the United States was founded, it had to write itself a set of rules. These rules are called the constitution. The constitution is the backbone of American government, for it is the rule of the land. The very first amendment added to the constitution starts …show more content…

One of the major problems that arise from any type of censorship is the way it negatively affects the citizens of the US. A great deal of censorship is seen online from the federal government and private companies alike. One way the federal government has censored private companies online is fines for if a platform is used for adult interaction. This act preventing this interaction is helpful for the general public, but an entire industry felt a hit (“Censorship”). Online communication made many of the “adult” workers safer and prerecord while working. The government should be a tool to help all citizens of the country, not some. This act had made the safety of using online services for their work unavailable. Censoring online has led to other problems. What happens when information is wrongly censored? In the beginning of the COVID pandemic, online sources had “platforms wrongly banned and suppressed information regarding the origins of COVID 19” (Hagerty). By suppressing correct information, media had withheld the truth of what had been happening in the world to those who use the internet as a tool. This idea of wrongly censoring leads to the general public to question if what they are being told is true or if what they are not being told is more important. It is the federal government’s job to assist its citizens, meaning they should be informing them the

Show More
Related
1517 Words | 7 Pages

Censorship is dangerous, and too much of it can lead to an inevitable destruction of our

Read More
1582 Words | 7 Pages

The rise of Google and other platforms forces people everywhere to wonder what's more important: protection of information through censorship, or the freedom

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

When Bradbury wrote about the danger of censorship, the world may have been already been being censored with the events of World War II. If there was already censorship then and increasing, he had a lot to worry about for the U.S.’s future. Censorship is bad now, and it is only getting worse, which can make citizens rebel against it’s government and against the site where information may be getting censored. According to usnew.com, authorities will almost certainly have to step in, just as they did when credit bureaus were regulated in 1970 (Epstein). This states that this problem has been happening for a long time, prior to the 70’s, which as time will prove, its just gotten worse over time.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Keep censorship out of the picture unless a dire situation comes up in which it is absolutely necessary. Censorship should only be justified for security reasons. Censoring the general public is not a good idea. The public in the United States of America has the right to free speech and to say what they think without filters, which some people dislike. Although, people dislike being censored even more.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

Government is called to dictate internet content when one incites people to violence with his speech, however, it needs to be a true threat which includes immediacy and an actual intent. For instance, during the Vietnam War, a man expressed that “if he got drafted, his first bullet would be for President Johnson.” The Court detected no threat nor any real intent in the context, therefore, the government had no need to monitor what was being said. If the speech did not pose any likely threats but was regulated by the government, one’s freedom of

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

Government cannot censor the people of the united states. We have amendments for a reason. They went through all those wars and tragedy for us. For us to have Freedom of speech. The first amendment.

Read More
1326 Words | 6 Pages

The legality of these orders was challenged in court, with courts ultimately blocking the ban from going into effect. These debates highlight the ongoing tension between free speech and regulation, particularly in the context of new and emerging technologies. While the First Amendment provides protections for freedom of expression, the challenges posed by social media and other online platforms raise important questions about how to ensure that these protections remain relevant in a changing media

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

When a journalist wants to report an article, interview, survey, etc. they cannot report what people need and/or want to know, they can only report what the government wants the people to know (“Censorship Effects on Society”). They do not have the freedom to express what they really want to which deprives them of their rights. The United States and many other countries see the internet as a threat and a means of control which is why information of the World Wide Web is censored (Bennett). It is believed that the government censors as a way to have control not to protect citizens; by knowing more, they have the upper

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

Two seven zero zero zero zero zero zero zero. Those numbers, plus a few commas, make up two hundred seventy million. That really big figure is the number of Americans who used social media apps in the past year. With the role of social media in our world growing, suppressing or prohibiting parts of it that some deem unacceptable, or a threat to their way of life, is quite common. Censorship, a word that has been tossed around a lot, is the act of hiding parts of something considered to be corrupt or menacing from a particular audience.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

Censorship can be very harmful to society but it also has the power to save it from creating negative

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

The government is constantly attempting to take total control over society and its citizens, by regulating what is available, what can and cannot be done, and more. In America, it is believed that the citizens ' First Amendment right to freedom of religion, assembly, press, petition, and speech protects them from being able to be censored by the government and other figures with authority, but that is incorrect. The federal government has censored press on various occasions throughout history, contemporary censorship is practiced in non-governmental organizations and corporations, and in schools, as well as public libraries, books are continuously challenged in hopes of them being removed or banned. Censorship, and the government taking total control of what readers can and cannot read is a danger to society because censorship places limitations on the knowledge and creativity of citizens, hinders their right to freedom of expression, and shelters citizens from the harsh realities that are present in today 's world. Censorship places limitations on the knowledge and creativity of citizens.

Read More
1927 Words | 8 Pages

Who and where can the government use its power? Is there any organization to keep the government in check? These are all questions that the nation is trying to address. Either way, as proven by history, government censorship is necessary; however, the limitation to its censoring power must be clear and a system to prevent the possible abuse of this power is crucial. Overall, censorship should exist only for speeches that contained clear and dangerous intent and information published by media that contained a true threat to national security.

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

In June, 2008, there is a unbelieveable news topic was posted on ‘One News Show’ which is “Homosexual eases into 100 final at Olympic trials”. The truth is that; ‘One News Show’ was using automatic filtering system that switches an American Olympic medalist, ‘Tyson Gay’ into ‘Tyson Homosexual’. They soon edited the article but that ridiculous topic would be a great example of immoderate Internet Censorship.(Arrieta) Not individual group is censoring the internet, but also a government is censoring the internet under the guise of protecting their citizen from noxious informations like pornography or websites containing too much violent contents. Especially, a lot of Asian Countries are listed on the ‘Enemies of the Internet’ list by ‘Reporters

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Furthermore, in many developing countries or in those with oppressive regimes, government actions are more important than the Internet in defining how information is produced and consumed, and by whom. There are so many counties that use strict censorship in their media. “Present-day examples include Russia as a territorially shrunken successor state to the former USSR, China and North Korea” (Höchli, 2010). Censorship in North Korea is known to be the most intense among the world. With a government such as theirs, they are able to take strict control over communications.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Federal Censorship

Related Topics

Open Document