ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

1141 Words5 Pages

Criminals don’t follow laws.

Gun control laws are more oppressive on citizens than criminals, which is literally someone who has broken, or is breaking, a law. Why are some gun control laws and rulings so heavily pushed? Especially considering that the majority of these laws have very little actual basis aside from the “guns are scary and bad” train of thought. This is going to be going into why most of these laws, current, and proposed, make no sense such as the Magazine Capacity bans that some states are putting in place, the entirety of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA), and the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban(AWB). There isn’t a clear definition for so-called “Assault Weapons”, magazine bans aren’t going to stop a criminal, and for what reason is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE) enforcing, and still modifying a document from the 30s?
A large portion of gun control laws are completely nonsensical and aren’t going to impact someone trying to harm. If the definition of a criminal is that they are breaking the law, why do they think one will follow these laws? One of the terms that are commonly thrown around by anti-gun advocates is the term …show more content…

One of the major acts that the BATFE passed was the National Firearm Act of 1934 (NFA). It was passed due to the large number of violent criminals in the United States during, and following, the prohibition era in the United States. Even though the NFA was made to stop criminals from getting these firearms, you can still pay the ATF $200 tax stamp and get it anyway. Within the NFA there are a few classifications for what is considered an NFA item, but the major ones are Short Barrelled Rifles (SBR), Automatic Firearms, Suppressors, and Any Other Weapons

Show More
Related
1569 Words | 7 Pages

Before and after the Revolution many gun control laws came into existence to keep the guns away from the blacks. Gun control is not only a crime issue, but it is a constitutional right issue. According to the second Amendment in the Constitution every citizen has the right to own a bear arms and gun control is a clear violation. The citizens who obey the laws

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

The Brady Act would be strength based if there were not loopholes in the law for getting guns such as not requiring background checks for private sellers, online gun dealers, and trade shows. However, new laws that close the loopholes and tighter gun control laws that include several laws are strength based because they do lower the death rates and violence caused from firearms. Research studies show a correlation between states that do have strict gun laws compared to others that are lax. One study done by the “researchers at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard School of Public Health, uses a measure of state-by-state legislative strength of gun control policies tracked by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence,

Read More
281 Words | 2 Pages

Gun control laws should be more strict because there has been to many shoot outs all over the world, this has caused many people to die. The most recent shoot outs have been in turkey and many other places. With stricter gun laws there would not be as many shoot outs. Not only shoot outs but other killings. There should be way more strict gun laws because it would make better communities and better neighborhoods.

Read More
1850 Words | 8 Pages

Gun control has been a prominent topic of debate in recent years, as concerns regarding mass shootings, gun violence, and public safety have increased. The conversation around this issue has been characterized by strong opinions and divergent perspectives. At the forefront of this discussion are two prominent organizations: the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Administration (ATF). Both the NRA and the ATF have significant influence over gun laws and regulations, and they often find themselves on opposite sides of the debate. One of the primary arguments put forth by the NRA is centered around the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Read More
1906 Words | 8 Pages

In order to understand the impact of proposed gun control laws, it is vital to understand gun control itself. Gun control laws are regulations of the owning, manufacturing, and use of firearms. In the United States, some see gun control as needed and others see it as a form of tyranny. This divide in beliefs is what has caused gun control to be such a highly discussed issue. The emotional connection that surrounds it, due to shootings and gun violence, also leads people to misjudge the impact on crime that the proposed laws may have.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

‘In the late 1980s, gun control groups realized that they had failed in their original goal—getting handguns banned—and began campaigning against semi-automatic firearms they called "assault weapons," most of which are rifles’(“A ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime”). From 1994 to 2004, the Federal Assault Weapons (F.D.A) banned semi automatic weapons from having more than 10 rounds. The easiest way to define gun control is by saying it a government regulation sale of any type of handgun, or assault rifle. It’s just a certain style the government sales firearms, if you have a criminal background or criminal history you are not allowed to purchase a firearm due to gun control. I personally think gun control doesn’t cause any harm to today’s society, considering the fact that i’m constantly around guns and I have no violent urge to put anyone in danger.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

Although guns have been used to harm, injure, and kill our fellow brothers and sisters, gun control laws should not be enacted. Gun laws are the regulation of the selling, owning, and use of guns. We as a nation are built on the freedom of not being controlled by the government. When more and more gun laws are enacted, more and more of our freedom is taken away. Slowly our nation will crumble and fall beneath us.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

As Marco Rubio often proclaimed during the primary campaign: "My skepticism about gun laws is criminals don 't follow the law.” People won’t follow laws. People will find ways to bypass laws and commit

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Basically gun control laws that restrict guns from being owned will not stop a criminal from getting a gun. These laws will only take guns away from people who buy them legally and enjoy them safely, this isn't very fair to law abiding citizens. Opponents of less gun control laws might say that background checks will help to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them. However criminals can still take them from people who have bought guns legally and passed background checks.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

The ones who are committing gun related crimes have typically purchased a firearm from someone who did not do a background check and didn't care who they were selling to. What actually is gun control and what does it mean? Efforts to regulate or control sales of guns is the denotative definition of gun control. In this essay I will talk about how that definition had shifted into something that we know and tolerate today. Gun control dates back to the 1930s.

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

People are afraid that the government is trying to take away the ever sacred second amendment, and that without weapons, the ordinary man cannot protect himself. This, however, is not the case. Creating these laws would mean that criminals would be less able to commit gun related crimes, and those who abide by the law would still have proper protection. Even if criminals acquire weapons, people can still find protection in their weapons that they have. No matter what certain citizens view and believe, there are few critical downsides of gun control laws; on the contrary, the laws will provide more protection for the American people, and will ultimately show criminals that this country can stand up for

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

This way of thinking is understandable because if we don't get weapons, then how are we supposed to protect ourselves. I also disagree with this because if the laws are more strict then there will be less crime and this will make them not want to do the right thing. Some argue that making gun control laws more strict is not the best way to go. ( Sheldon Richman) argues that gun control is ineffective at preventing crime.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

It makes sense; however, we know that gun control laws are only good in theory, it does not show any evident of decrease in crimes due to stricter gun laws or total ban on guns. Why? Well, let take a look at the 1976 the ban on all handguns in Washington, D.C. The laws ruled that no one other than law enforcement has the right to bear arms.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

Gun laws simply penalize and restrict honest citizens while criminals continue to find ways and loopholes to arm themselves. Gun laws currently established serve their purpose rather poorly as criminals unceasingly buy guns even after they are said to be forbidden. History serves as a clear example of how guns protect the rights and liberties of individuals as it was private guns that aided colonists in fighting the British and gaining America’s

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

Related Topics

Open Document