ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

1101 Words5 Pages

Throughout human history, crime and violence has existed and will never cease to exist. As time passed, more and more different kinds of weapons were created to help deter crime and its related violence. The invention of guns was the most successful as they are used by a large majority of people. Along with their invention came the gun crimes. Guns are the best means of defense as they are so lethal and due to this fact, the want for restrictive gun control laws has been a constant subject of debate. Most of society believes that the more restrictive the laws get, the safer it is for everyone. However, based on the information and research provided within the articles between 2001 and 2014, laws that severely restrict the ownership and access …show more content…

This in turn puts the idea that their victim is armed through their heads. In an article written by Mark Gius, he states that “Violent crime is, unfortunately, part of American society. My research has indicated that assault weapon bans have had no significant effects on gun related murders but that permissive concealed carry laws, as opposed to restrictive ones, may actually reduce gun related murders” (Gius 8). Gius also states that states with restrictive gun carrying laws had around a 10% higher crime rate. Another author, Mark Duggan, also believes CCW laws can help reduce crime rates. CCW laws permit the ownership of concealed weapons and allows the owner to carry their gun around for self-defense. Duggan states “CCW legislation has reduced the crime rate by increasing the likelihood that potential victims would be carrying a firearm” (Duggan 1088). In this statement, the author is referring to the fact that gun ownership deters criminals and reduces crime rates. Jens Ludwig also suggests that permissive concealed gun laws reduce crime rates. He states that his findings have “figured prominently in recent debates about concealed carry laws in states such as California, Colorado, Kansas, Minnesota, and Missouri” (Ludwig 355). What the author means by this statement is that the states he listed all have permissive concealed carry laws and they all have lower crime rates compared to states with restrictive

Show More
Related
391 Words | 2 Pages

As Americans we are no longer safe. Instead of more gun control, we need to strongly look at concealed carry laws. This law has the potential to reduce crime, and prevent mass shootings. Most importantly, it is our constitutional right. First and most importantly, it is clear that concealed carry laws reduce crime.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

For the past 232 years, Americans have had the right to defend themselves against crime, tyranny, and victimization through the rights given to us by our founding fathers. If these rights were restricted or even taken away from Americans, the crime rate would soar, and the safety of the people and families of America would be put in jeopardy. If these rights were restricted, the generations to come would be brought into an environment of violence and crime. (Purpose Statement) While many think that gun control can fix the rate of gun homicides and crimes and mass shootings, it will most likely have the opposite effect and will restrict our right to defend ourselves.

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

According to John R. Lott Jr., PhD. “When states passed concealed carry laws during the 19 years we studied (from 1977 to 1995) the number of multiple- victim public shootings declined by 84%. Deaths from these shootings plummeted on average by 90% and injuries by 82%. In fact FBI crime data by economist and political commentator John R. Lott Jr, calculated that 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults, and 12,000 robberies could have been prevented between 1977 and 1992 if concealed carry could have been legal in every US state during that time period,”(ProCon.org). This proves that, by passing concealed carry laws, the percentage of crime has decreased ,and states have become safer due to restrictions but still allowing people to protect

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

An article in the Patriot Talon states that the right-to-carry gun laws have been “linked to an increase in violent crime.” Now this shouldn’t be a surprise; the more cars you have on the street, the more likely there is to be an accident. The same goes for guns. However, unlike driving, carrying a gun is not a necessity and gun extremists in America don’t believe this to be true. An opinion article in The Daily Beast shows that not everyone thinks open carry is a bad thing.

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, some may have less gun laws, yet may see a decrease in crime. Just because the stricter rules that are placed in one country may lead to a decrease in crime, it does not meant that the implementation of stricter laws in the United States will lead to prevention of crime. In essence, the claim presented by those who advocate stricter gun laws is rather weak because it fails to bring into consideration any data that speaks about the rates of homicide in other countries with different degrees of gun control

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

In 1993, after passing their conceal carry law, Florida’s homicide rate fell from 36% above the national average to 4% below the national average (Golden CO: Independence Institute Issue Paper). If all states passed concealed carry laws they would enable law-abiding citizens to make their community safer. With the passing of conceal carry laws in all states, it would help further the decline of crime, enable the government to do background checks on all people with a permit, enable law-abiding citizens to be able to protect themselves, and a large portion of the population supports the idea of being able to carry a weapon. Conceal carry laws have been proven to further the decline of crime in states.

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

Violent crimes reported on the news while still surprising to hear and see has become very common. While the numbers seem to be overwhelming, statistics share violent crimes are at an all-time low. While the numbers of crimes are decreasing, gun ownership is increasing. Begging one to ask if the right to conceal to carry reduce

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

To begin with, viewpoint on prohibiting concealed weapons in certain locations will reduce crime and ensure that the location is free of gun violence. The threat to public safety if “concealed carry” goes national. Firstly, the National Rifle Association has enabled millions to go armed into public places. For example, The Editorial Board, from New York Times, Shares president Donald Trump’s campaign celebrated the N.R.A.’S fantasy idea. By telling citizens they can protect themselves by having a shootout (Board).

Read More
96 Words | 1 Pages

The concealed weapons law stops crime quite significantly. The law has reduced murders, rapes, aggravated assaults, and robberies. Murders by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robbery by 3%. More research was conducted on why this law helps deter crime and between 1980 and 2009, states with more restrictive laws for concealed weapons had gun-related murder rates that were 10%. Also, before Florida passed the concealed weapons law, they had 36% higher crime rate than the nation average.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Although mass shootings have greatly increased from 2001, bring in stricter gun laws is not a simple solution(Schmidt 2014). Throughout the years statics show that despite the fact that bring stricter gun laws seems like a good idea, it is often worse for the community. For example, California is known for its very strict gun laws, ranking at number one in the US, and this is a key factor to why crime rates are some of the highest in the country (Hartvigsen 2013). Statistics also show that from 1993 to 2013 guns per person has arisen and gain control per person has lowered (perry

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Out of 62 mass shootings in the U.S between 1982 and 2012, 49 of the shooters used legally obtained guns. 143 guns were possessed by the killers with about 75% obtained legally. Essentially, gun control laws ineffective. In addition, In a 1998 publication by John Lott PhD, he outlined the many benefits that concealed carry offers, including reducing crime significantly. According to Lott, there was an 8.5% reduction in homicides, 7% in aggravated assaults, 5% in rape, and 3% in robbery following the passing of gun rights or laws.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

“…during the years in which the D.C. handgun ban and trigger lock law were in effect, the Washington, D.C. murder rate average 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law, while the U.S. murder rate average 11% lower”(Agresti & Smith, 2010). Since gun ban law, the murder rate in D.C. went up even though American rate went down. Many people do not realize that since 190, forty-four states have passed CWP laws that allowing

Read More
1169 Words | 5 Pages

Alexis Clarke Professor Frank English 110 29 October 2015 Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime The big issue of gun control in the United States, is that many people believe that it takes away the 2nd Amendment rights, which is the right to bear arms. Citizens of the United States are promised the the right to bear arms in the Constitution, and by applying gun control laws takes away that same right. Crime is high enough in cities with very few laws pertaining to gun control, but taking guns away from people who are registered with license will not solve the problem either. Placing more limitations on gun owners, particularly responsible gun owners, will not reduce gun violence.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

Moorhouse, John C, and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Ebscohost, 1 Jan. 2006, web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=db378b8b-d9e7-4ee7-b26c-460bc1177bd4%40sessionmgr4008. Moorhouse and Wanner, in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, studied whether or not gun control reduced gun violence in individual states. The overarching theme throughout the individual states is that gun control doesn’t reduce gun violence and is very ineffective.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

Related Topics

Open Document