ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Human Gene Editing

685 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gene editing cons and pros

During this month of December a summit was hailed in Washington DC to discuss one thing, human gene editing. This is a very important topic as of right now as scientist reach closer and closer to playing god when it comes to gene editing. That is why there needs to be boundaries of what is okay to alter and what is not. There is even a possibility of completely changing the entire human genome for the future with this. Gene editing could be used for good as like helping cure cancer and diseases that are genetically passed down. But there could also be a possibility of this being abused and causing certain things to change that might cause negative ripples for the future. This is also an ethical issue because what scientist are doing could be seen as …show more content…

Human gene editing could affect society in a very big way. It could drastically change how humans even look like and what they could get. This could have some ripples into the future because as we all know, evolution changes species. This process could take thousands and thousands of years. But with editing the human gene it could actually accelerate this process by altering humans and different species in just a few generations. Wither or not you are for or against it you need to realize as well that this could help accelerate humans. What this science issue is trying to answer is that how this could be used for the greater good but it also needs to be regulated. Like with editing we could uncover more scientific discovers that could help us better understand the human genome and also prevent diseases and certain features that would be consider not wanted. Scientist also implanted test animals with certain human diseases to see how it reacts in the molecular level and treatment to fight it off. But another hurdle to overcome is safety because there is also a possibility a scientist could slice the wrong DNA and it can cause major side

Show More
Related
1048 Words | 5 Pages

As a society we are adapting, changing, and growing every day. Genetic modification is happening; many people are just not aware. Genetic engineering is great for society because it can cause many new advancements for the as in world with no diseases and a world without hunger. “There is a good case for exploring all ideas relevant to our current concerns, no matter where they lead” (Pinker 533). Although no one knows how far genetic enhancing and cloning could go makes it a dangerous idea, does not mean as a society that we ignore it.

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

This allows for the cure of DNA mutation diseases, along with elimination of diseases from the human species. The opposition of CRISPR’s use states that technology is risky, will permanently change the human genome, and open the path of designer babies. The risk of CRISPR is minimal. Thus, the lives saved will for the greater good will outweigh the possible side effects. The worry of altering the genome can be viewed as not an issue as the elimination of diseases will increase the quality of life for people.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

("New Developments in Human Gene Editing Face an Ethical and Regulatory Quagmire in the

Read More
2373 Words | 10 Pages

The first step to making this safer should be germline editing in a dish to understand how to reduce risks such as targeting the wrong gene, off-target impacts (which create new problems), and mosaicism (when all copies of the gene were not changed) (Bergman). Given how much is unknown about germline gene editing, it was a shock to the world when a news leak in 2018 revealed Dr. Jiankui He, from the Southern University of Science and Technology, used gene editing to disable CCR5 (a gene involved with the HIV infection) in early embryos. The embryos were then implanted, and twin girls were born. Dr. He’s experiment was criticized for the lack of transparency (National Academies). While most scientists do not support the experiment done by Dr. He, many do support

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

Also, if we make things genetically changed they will mess up the natural order of the environment. " Human genetic engineering is coming. Science is about to solve some of the worst problems that can happen to people: cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, Alzheimer's and the many other devastating results that can come out of the random genetic lottery that is reproduction. But that power means we are also about to set the bar on what it means to be a person and have a productive life.

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

Also the technology isn’t 100% safe yet as it’s only in the experimental stage still. Therefore I don’t think we should be allowed to genetically modify our children because there’s a greater possibility of accidentally “killing” the offspring than having them as the parents mix of their own

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

Centuries before humanity was able to tell stories through motion picture or photography, artists wished to tell a story visually. This is especially true within the Pre-Renaissance Era of the Middle Ages. Artists would take inspiration from written manuscripts and create art based on their story or message to the audience. For example, illuminated manuscripts, in particular, were literal manuscripts that artists embellished with beautiful decorum or illustrations to heighten the delivery of the storyline. This practice of storytelling carried on into the Early Renaissance and was revolutionized by Giotto di Bondone (1267-1337).

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

What does the future hold for genetic engineering? Imagine living in a world with no disease, no disabilities, and nothing that holds back a person. “Humans who have had their DNA genetically modified could exist within two years” (Knapton). That means any birth defects that have to do with the genes can be fixed. People could quite literary design the “perfect child”.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

Altering one's DNA may be seen as unnatural. Perhaps they argue that natural selection is the only way. However, the natural selection argument has flaws. In fact, Charles Darwin himself noticed severe imperfections in human nature and noted that its methods are, in fact, quite ineffectual in many ways. Moreover, curing genetic disorders and diseases, like Down Syndrome, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s, through means of waiting for natural selection would not be as effective as using genetic modification because natural selection follows no plan or design for evolution, so there is no guarantee that anything will ever be cured, and natural selection is a slow, painful, and imprecise process, so why waste time when we can expedite the process with genetic modification and help the people here today.

Read More
1753 Words | 8 Pages

The Rise of Human Genetic Modification? There are many controversial issues throughout time that have risen and led countries to disagree to with one another worldwide. Eugenics and genetic engineering on humans is a topic that many believe crosses a major ethical boundary. Many scientists and ethicists believe that gene editing on human genes is unethical at certain degrees and it should not be done until the proper precautions have been overlooked and restrictions are made.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, genetic modifying can allow people to live longer. You may think that this is good that people would live longer, but there some negative aspects to this. Life would be very boring of course, but more importantly, overpopulation would happen and humans would be in competition with one another since everything would now be limited. While some aspects of genetic engineering should appealing, they all most likely have a dark secret hiding within

Read More
1211 Words | 5 Pages

Genome editing offers a great deal of control and accuracy in how DNA sequences are changed. It can provide improvements in healthcare by saving lives. If the procedure is successful then there is a newfound permanent solution to prevent genetic diseases. However, it does create disruptive news to the public of whether it is ethical or an unethical choice.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

The researchers then combine the broken gene with a healthy gene. This new healthy gene is now modified and free from the mutation it had before. Although many individuals’ ethics and morals stand in the way of gene editing, this technology affects society in many different

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

We have already used technology to alter a lot of things in in this world that has resulted in great advancement, using technology to manipulate biology should not be thought of as anything more than advancement and an opportunity to adjust what could not be adjusted before. We have always thought that the gene or the nature of a child

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

Gene editing is the alteration of a person’s genetic material to delete undesirable traits or to create desirable new ones. Scientists can identify a defective DNA strand to be cut out and changed, then they use a protein that acts like scissors to cut out the improper gene and cells, then a healthy strand of DNA is inserted at the cut site and enzymes repair it (Crow). The goal of gene editing is to treat genetic disorders. Gene editing could potentially decrease or even

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Human Gene Editing

Related Topics

Open Document