Rothman et al (2017) implicates a sense of urgency in relation to survivor identification. Asserting current calculations and scholarly research do not represent the true realities of human trafficking. Implying data obtained from criminal justice systems rarely pinpoints exact results as many traffickers avoid detections and dedicated hotlines most often report inadequate or overestimated cases. Suggesting more accuracy and precision is warranted.
To articulate more precise representation Rothman et al. (2017) encourages the use of statistical measures derived within sampling studies to capture and recapture necessary data and themes. Resulting in the delivery of credible estimates that policy makers use to evaluate for effectiveness within prevention and intervention efforts.
Respectfully Rothman et al. (2017) argues that once health and human services and criminal justice proponents understand the cost burdens associated with trafficking they will move towards clarification and prioritization of preventative measures. Again, without sound estimates of prevalence and incidences; program advocates cannot wage the net cost of trafficking on individuals and communities or properly assess resource allocation
…show more content…
This challenges public entities and law enforcement to expand upon detections going beyond prostitution or commercialized sex and forces agents to understand the hidden dynamics associated with forced labor. To dispute masculine myths associated with trafficking, Tien (2013), suggests that males should be aware of program accessibility and treatment options that are much more significant than one’s perceived masculinity or social status. Tien urges that once identified, males should be afforded shelter, medical health care, counseling services and employment assistance equitable to their female