More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis statement embryonic stem cell research
Ethical debate on embryonic stem cell research
Ethical debate on embryonic stem cell research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thesis statement embryonic stem cell research
Search for literature or research that will help you answer this question. Summarize and cite it here. Explain Lo, Bernard, and Lindsay Parham. " Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research."
The deliberation of bioethics in human cell and stem cell research has flip-flopped altercations between whether stem cell research corrupts the future or if basic ethical uses in clinical research are being held to its standards. The idea of having genetically altered drugs and cells sits with people the wrong way, and with that they have come to the decision that cell research will cause more problems than it stopping them. However, while a majority of people and scientists believe genetic engineering is an evil corruption of nature’s course, genetic engineering has the greatest potential to do something great for our future, but it is our moralistic responsibility to follow the rules of bioethics. The author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta
The essay “Best Hope Lies in Privately Funded Stem Cell Research”, states the importance of stem cell research and the effects it can have on curing disease more effectively than any other method. Written by Sigrid Fry-Revere, PhD, director of bioethics studies at the Cato Institute; the author of the paper emphasizes the importance of funding programs for stem cell research on highlights the government holding out on funding due to ethical reasons. Revere claims that the government is threatening the private investing of stem cell research organizations and are trying to put a stop to production of research. This essay is targeted for people who are academic/bioethics orientated and the future of the world disease control and abolishment.
However, many find this research unethical because of the method of collecting stem cells. Like Victor Frankenstein’s experiment,
Over the years, there have been many controversial issues surrounding medical research, but one of the most arguable topics of all time is the use of embryonic stem cells. Some individuals believe that extracting stem cells from unborn babies will be useful to create new medications or, in most cases, help regenerate damaged cells. Although, many people disagree with the process scientists use to obtain these stem cells. By continuing embryonic stem cell research, scientists are denying an unborn child the chance to live, they are not letting nature take its intended course, and they are not adhering to the religious or moral beliefs of many people.
Embryonic stem cell research was established in the early 80’s and has since sparked into a highly controversial issue involving religious debates over the use of human embryos. Embryonic stem cells are considered to be unspecialized cells, which can be manipulated into specialized cells such as a skin cell or a heart cell. The specialized cells could potentially cure conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cystic fibrosis, and spinal cord injuries. Despite the large amount of ethical complications that come along with the utilization of stem cells, I advocate that stem cell research should be expanded and developed more widely in the medical field.
In recent years, several competing viewpoints have emerged about embryonic stem cell research. All of this debate raises an important question, Should embryonic stem cell research be conducted for treatment of present and future diseases? People who believe that an embryo should not be destroyed tend to say that embryonic stem cell research should not be conducted. On the other hand, people who believe that embryonic stem cell research creates means of curing diseases reply that the research should be conducted. Embryonic stem cell research “uses special cells found in three-to-five day old human embryos to seek cures for a host of chronic disease” (PRC).
It took seven years of research, but in 1988, it was determined that human embryos did in fact contain stem cells (“Stem Cell Basics III”). Since this discovery, embryonic stem cell research has been thrust to the forefront of medical research. Scientists claim embryonic stem cells’ potential is unimaginable. The stem cells obtained from embryos are truly pluripotent, so many believe they could be the cure to many horrible diseases. There is just one problem with the research of embryonic stem cells: it raises a huge moral and ethical dilemma.
Acts whether careless or unintended can have consequences that can forever change a life. One such event began on the early morning of June 1, 1995. The man many have grown to love as Superman had fallen victim to an ill-fated accident while horseback riding leaving him paralyzed. Could Stem Cells have returned Christopher Reeves back to Superman? Stem Cells are one of the leading departments studied in the medical field for cures and treatments for a variety of diseases.
https://stemcells.nih.gov/info/Regenerative_Medicine/2006Chapter1.htm http://www.newhealthadvisor.com/Pros-and-Cons-of-Stem-Cell-Research.html The use of human embryos for medical research has been put in debate for many years and is creating a drift in politics and scientific research. Having this research and experiment conducted should be gone ahead with because not only will it save many lives and help people in need but also reduce the amount of organ donors and also giving a chance at science to be advancing at the same time. I am in favor of this because people in wheelchairs are supporting such research believing that this could give them a quality of life back. Such people are waiting for the opportunity to be granted the use of embryonic stem cells to help pick them up on top of their feet even if there may be a few risks involved.
Some researchers believe that by using stem cells we will be able to find cures for many diseases and common ailments. The primary ethical concern is where the stem cells are coming from. In 1998, the work of Dr. James Thomson at the University of Wisconsin and Dr. John Gearhart at Johns Hopkins University used privately funded laboratories to isolate and culture human embryonic stem cells. The problem with human embryonic stem cell research is once the stem cells have been harvested, the embryo is destroyed, and so is the potential human life. (Heather, J. K., 2002)
The majority of people are generally astounded to observe all the scientific and technologic developments accomplished over the past 50 years. Needless to say, we are currently using up-to-date techniques, having convenient and comfortable lifestyles, and enjoying brand-new types of multimedia. However, just as every coin has two sides, there are also many disadvantages behind these drastic developments. Eventually, the worst problem appears from the scientists’ lack of morality. They tend not to take responsibility or action for scientific discoveries without completely acknowledging the influence they might create.
Though technology at some point will likely make this possible, “human cloning is scientifically distant at best” and “the scientific community has universally condemned it” (Acost and Golub 429). Without the support of the possible creators of this technology, there is no way that this would ever come about, and it remains irrelevant to the known information about the benefits stem cell research would have on the world of healing medicine. At the center of the controversy lies politics and the continuous battle between being supportive of the research and respecting the beliefs of American groups. Starting in 1995, legislation took on the topic of stem cell research by creating the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.
There are 10,000 known diseases in the world, but there are treatments for only 500 of them (McCarthy). While new diseases keep getting discovered, the number of cures isn’t growing proportionally. However, embryonic stem cell research could potentially change these trends and alter the face of medicine completely. Stem cell research provides hope in finding treatments and cures to diseases thousands battle worldwide, regardless of the extensive ethical concerns about social justice associated with it.
Destroying these embryos in research would not deprive them of a valuable future. It would be unethical, under whatever circumstances to practice wanted embryos for research. Human animal chimera, an experiment was conducted using the genetic material from human convey to an animal. In addition they argue stem cell research paid minor contemplation to the potential of the umbilical cord. The therapy point out that no medication have been yet produced.
