ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of International Whaling

728 Words3 Pages

I believe that the Japanese and the Norwegians have a very valid point on the permitting of hunting of non-endangered species of whales. The global community has jumped on the whaling issue for various reasons. Some might include the fact some whales are becoming endangered as a result of the whaling industry, but I believe that a lot of the reason lies in the fact that the western world finds the concept of whaling disturbing simply because of the size and the human like qualities that we place on the animal. This argument then becomes a question of one culture versus the other. One culture sees whaling as barbaric and believe that it should stop the other culture sees whaling as normal since it has been a part of their culture for a long time.

Instituting a worldwide whaling ban means that an international organization is basically walking into a sovereign country and telling them which things they can and cannot do. That is definitely a threat to a nation’s sovereignty. Sovereignty allows a nation to make its own rules and decide how to enforce those rules. However, if an international organization walks …show more content…

In theory, this would be the ideal. In an argument between nations, a neutral party should come in and intervene. However, would an international panel actually be neutral? Who constitutes the members of such a panel? It is the same people who have been raised in cultural contexts that would not understand the context of the two nations requiring a whaling ban to be lifted. Because of this, it is uncertain whether such a panel would actually be able to be fare in their judgments. In order to achieve some level of fairness, such a committee should contain persons from all over the globe, from cultures that are against whaling as well as those who are for it. This way, the points and arguments of both sides stand a chance of being heard and

Show More
Related
1280 Words | 6 Pages

He compares the mass extinction of various animals 65 million years ago (Glavin, 2013, p. 167) to the depletion of big fish in the sea. This presents a false analogy fallacy (Henderson, 2013, p. 52), as the extinction of dinosaurs and near disappearance of cod have very little in common, and appears to exaggerate the situation regarding the exhausting populations of fish. Furthermore, the article later goes on to discuss sustainability in fisheries (Glavin, 2013, p. 168-169), veering off the topic of defending seal hunting. The author makes references to how the Marine Stewardship Council and their "eco-label" are forcing fisheries to take up more sustainable practices (Glavin, 2013, p. 168-169). This information appears to be encouraging the reader not to boycott seafood because the seafood is becoming more and more sustainable.

Read More
1400 Words | 6 Pages

The Notorious Interventionist: Paul Watson Whaling has always been a part of human culture, and still is in some parts of the world, though in most places, it has been outlawed due to declining whale populations and the efforts to protect and conserve marine life. Many conservation societies exist, like Greenpeace and WDC (Whale and Dolphin Conservation society), and they all aim to protect the natural environment and the animals that reside within them. Paul Watson, founder of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, is a self-proclaimed interventionist. His anti-whaling efforts have led some to agree that he is only an interventionist, though others call him a criminal or terrorist.

Read More
1576 Words | 7 Pages

Although more than two-thirds of the Earth is covered in water, there is still a general misunderstanding of the ocean by the public. This misunderstanding of wonderment and misunderstanding has led to movies portraying the ocean as a “final frontier” with tremendous, mythical beasts as demonstrated in the recently released movies of The Meg (2021) and Underwater (2022). Although, the most acclaimed works are based on real-life events such as Moby Dick and Jaws. In both of these books, the characters go through trials and tribulations in quarreling with these deep sea monsters in the process suffering their limbs and lives. On the contrary, however, it is humankind who has become the ocean’s monsters.

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

What needs to be addressed regarding the release of captive whales is their survivability in the wild6. Many killer whales are bred in captivity now, and thus have depended on humans for the entirety of their lives7. If a captive bred whale were released into the wild, it is likely that he or she would approach humans which could be dangerous for both the human and the whale. Captive bred killer whales would also likely have difficulty hunting, as their food was always provided for them by humans.

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

The grey whale population in 2001 was about 26,000, although this is the highest it’s ever been, is it a valid reason for them to be hunted? Animal activist groups think the hunting of grey whales is inhuman. Whereas the Makah, a tribe who hunt whales, believes it is part of their culture. This is the root of all conflict, multiple groups with opposing opinions. Some of the reasons this conflict arose is because of whale population, treaty rights, and most importantly the break the Makah took from whaling.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

I think killer whales should not be kept in captivity because when killer whales are kept in captivity they live an average of 13 years whereas in the wild they live around six times as long. Also, they have to spend ¾ of their life in a small metal box, and get fed an unnatural diet of thawed fish.

Read More
1560 Words | 7 Pages

The only whales that should be kept in captivity are injured whales; whales that would never make it on their own. There are some rare instances when they need humans to survive. “Springer was an immature and sickly killer whale who lost her pod in 2002 and began to associate with humans in Puget Sound near Vancouver” (“What to do about a killer whale”). Springer was “nursed back to health and returned to the wild quickly” (“What to do about a killer whale”). If a whale needs help, then humans should do everything they can to get them healthy again and nothing more.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

What Whale Poaching Really is By: Logan B I believe whale poaching should be outlawed around the world. Bans have warned people to stop hunting the whales but still over 2,000 whales are killed each year. In 1958, thirty eight thousand whales were killed since then, the amount of whales killed has dropped to thirty six thousand whales from that time.

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

47 out of 50 states of the United States hunt for whales. Those states are Japan, Norway and Iceland. They still hunt since whales give them profit. As a result, Japan, Norway, and Iceland have often refused the idea of ending whaling even though they have many different resources that could still provide them. “It's one way that counties can earn profit."

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Whaling is a business that many people believe belongs in the past. Although it is going on in more countries inside and outside the international whaling commission (IWC) than is generally recognised. Public debates have given the impression that we only find this activity in Japan, Iceland and Norway. Whaling is a senseless act that needs to be stopped. Once it came to light the number of whales being killed was putting the whale populations under threat, a ban was introduced.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

First of all, The whaling commission tried to ban or lower the amount of whales for example, “The International Whaling Commission regulates the whaling industry, they have banned commercial whaling in 1986, it has been banned since then although whaling is still legal for scientific purposes.” In conclusion, The International Whaling Commission regulates the whaling industry, they have banned commercial whaling in 1986, it has been banned since then although whaling is still legal for scientific purposes. Second of all, The International Court of Justice wants to ban whaling programs. For example, “In 2014, the International Court of Justice ruled that Japan should stop its Antarctic whaling program because its purpose was not scientific as previously claimed”. In 2014, the International Court of Justice said that Japan is going to stop hunting whales in Antarctica because its purpose is not scientific as it was claimed to be.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Whaling Issue I completely agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on permitting the hunting of non-endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption. The hunting of whales has been sensitive subject in recent times. In fact, the previous global dependency on the oil from whales led to the significant decrease in whale population. At one time, the US contributed to the rapidly decreasing populations of whales. Many countries depended on whale oil for many different reasons such as light.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

As long as human lives are not in danger and no species are being threatened to be endangered or extinct, I see no reason to interfere. Citizens within their own country should be the only ones on the panel deciding what is best for their community. I define cultural activity as an act that is practiced which represents ones country and religious beliefs. Another example of cultural activity would be Native Americans hallucinating from peyote while praying to their gods. Most people and countries would disagree with this type of religious act but the Native Americans were doing this long before their lands were stolen.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

The Norwegian and Japanese positions and arguments to be permitted with the hunting of non-endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption should not be considered. According to the Whale and Dolphin Conservation, “the whaling industry is in decline and the demand for meat is falling” (WDC, n.d.). Given this statement, I would support the ban of whaling worldwide. In addition, it would be difficult and costly to monitor the whaling activity that is taking place in waters where whales frequent.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

This should be allowed insofar as the killing of whales is essential for the continued survival or basic-well being of the group of people that hunt the whales. International organizations such as the WTO (Anonymous, 2015)

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of International Whaling

Related Topics

Open Document