“Education is the key to success” is a common phrase said by many of our millennial cohorts. The idea that education is a critical component of acquiring an eminent lifestyle has dated back since premodern times. Individuals are now constantly enrolling in postsecondary institutions in hopes of attaining endless opportunities along with the implied benefits that results from a college degree. Nevertheless, a college education is, unfortunately, not accessible to all people. In “The Diploma Divide,” Kassie Bracken explores the major disparity among low income students and their affluent counterparts on obtaining a postsecondary degree in the U.S. With the employment of an alluring appeal to one’s emotions, a use of despondent word choices to establish a dispirited ambience, and a distinguished platform to elucidate the author’s thoughts, Kassie effectively promoted her argument on how a college education is not attainable for all individuals.
After the American Revolution the American society had been fundamentally changed. The Revolution changed the American society in the political, social, and economic fields. After breaking away from what appeared to be a corrupt government in England, American leaders formed the concepts of their ideal society. The American Revolution succeeding in accomplished the securing of rights for the citizens of America, however by not creating a sound economic base, the Revolution failed by not ensuring that the new government would be strong enough to protect rights.
Lowrey achieves greater efficacy in delivering her point when she mentions the financial aid award letters. “Non-standardized financial aid award letters might be the biggest problem.... But comparison shopping is difficult when you're weighing apples and oranges.” The colleges turn a simple process into a challenging task by preparing award letters that are vague, deceptive and labyrinthine. All colleges strive to offer some basic information to students, which includes cost of the year in college, financial aid the school provides, costs contributed by a student and the prospective gaps fulfilled through other sources.
With free college can be unbalanced since more rich students attend college than poor students at an early age. According to Bruenig,“At age nineteen, only around 20 percent of children from the poorest 2 percent of families in the country attend college. For the richest 2 percent of families, the same number is around 90 percent. In between these two extremes, college attendance rates climb practically straight up the income ladder: the richer your parents are, the greater the likelihood that you are in college at age nineteen(113).” He analyzed, that within college more rich student will likely attend college at age 19, than a 19-year old student from a poor background.
Recently, many have begun to attack and degrade higher education in the United States. In the book How College Works, authors Daniel Chambliss and Christopher Takacs claim, “As state support has eroded, and as more students attend college in an increasingly desperate attempt to find viable jobs, the price to students of attending an institution of higher education has gone up, especially at more selective institutions” (172). So is college even worth it? Caroline Bird’s excerpt from her book Case Against College “Where College Fails Us” is an adequately written article that agrees with those who question whether college is a good investment. Bird argues that although some students would benefit from college and succeed, many fall short, wasting
Even though the cost of college increased, the student debt did not. Exploring that thought, Mann proclaims “intelligence is the grand condition”. To receive intelligence, one must receive an education. Financial aid provides students with the resources to receive that education. Education prevents being impoverished As well Hoxby and Avery conclude that selective colleges cost “less” due to “financial aid”.
Throughout the articles, the authors reflect on their college experience. Hanks writes, “By some fluke of the punch-card computer era, I made Chabot’s dean’s list” by taking classes he found enjoyable, challenging, and divergent (Hanks 2). The author mentions a range of classes to illustrate the unpredictability of academic success, to prove the significance of personal preferences in shaping educational outcomes. Furthermore, Aguh asks a rhetorical question on how his parents achieved the American Dream, to which he responded, “It was my parents’ ability to come to the United States of America and study in its amazing public universities debt-free—my dad at the University of Texas-Austin and my mother at Rutgers—that changed their lives” (Aguh 1). Here, he contradicts common beliefs about low-income families, proving that affordable education promotes socioeconomic advancement and success.
Once again these officials are responsible for admitting the most talented and qualified applicants to maintain the integrity of their respective schools’ application process and to uphold the reputation of the institution as an equal opportunity provider. Getting beneficial treatment due to status and wealth occurs in society, but it is detrimental to those students who coast through life on the status of their family. The college admission process should be a merit and achievement based process, so every average student can remain motivated to become successful. Allowing people to buy or influence their way into college takes away the pureness of the ideal that opportunities for education should be fair and equitable for all
Although it is pointed out to the president that “community college tuition is already is free for low-income students” there is still an issue for those families make a good income amount and still don’t have the sufficient amount of money to pay for college tuition. Multiple low-income students have qualified for for grants such as the Pell grant and have benefitted from it because they end up being able to use about “$5,730 to cover books and living expenses” beyond having free tuition (Jacobs). Although many people say that starting off at a community college puts you at a lower advantage, that it not the case. Deborah Santiago, who is works with the nonprofit organization Excelencia in Education, advocates for students who are typically first generation. Within the article Ms. Santiago states that the “free tuition message could have ‘a powerful impact’ on first generation students, they need more support to compete college”.
Education is an essential component of personal and societal growth, and higher education has been shown to have a positive impact on both individuals and societies. Free college tuition is a contentious issue that raises important questions about the accessibility and affordability of higher education, and while there is so much to support the idea, there are also some drawbacks that must be considered. The topic of free college tuition has been debated for quite some time now. Those who are all for free tuition say having tuition-free colleges will help with higher access of education, help reduce student debt and can help the workforce’s numbers. Those against free tuition state that college is already or nearly free and that tuition free
With all the controversy surrounding the recent Supreme Court decision to end race-based affirmative action in college admissions, attention has been drawn to another form of bias rampant in admissions. Legacy admissions, also known as affirmative action for wealthy and connected students, is an unfair practice that should be banned from the college admission process. Similar to the race-based affirmative action that was recently banned, this practice gives a significant advantage in admissions to students based merely on who the applicants’ family is, which is a type of nepotism. There are arguments on both sides of this issue. The colleges that support legacy admissions seem to do it primarily based on monetary interests.
However, the increasing cost of college education has become a significant burden on the families of students and the students themselves. The factors contributing to the rising cost of college education include increasing tuition prices, room and board expenses, unnecessary fees, higher salaries for university staff, and the demand for higher education. Despite these challenges, states have yet to contribute more funds to help lower-income individuals achieve their higher education goals. The rising cost of college education is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted solution. It is essential to address factors such as administrative spending and the need for better policy in college administrations.
Many people dream of a life filled with riches, but that dream is hard to obtain without a college degree. It is somewhat ironic how people dream of being a successful student and going to college but the cost of tuition turns that dream into a horrible nightmare. It is not a shock to most people when they that college tuition is expensive, but in the past few years it has increased to an all-time high. Lower and middle class students have now begun to realize that college tuition is holding them away from their dreams. Even though college tuition could provide opportunities for job creation and economic growth, tuition is not affordable for the average American household which in effect, prohibits students from taking opportunities like going to college in the first place.
However, it is still an issue for students to cough up that money. The idea of making community college free to any student in America has been a dream for low income students for a while. President Obama’s desire to make the tuition of community college to everyone in the nation would only make it difficult for students to get a free education, limit them to essential resources, and discourage students from applying to four year universities. Granting free community college tuition to incoming freshmen will draw “more students to already crowded community colleges”. Along with the overcrowded campuses, a very long waiting list will soon form making it just as competitive to get into a four year university.
The disproportionately low number of black and Latino students – together which account for about 4 percent of the students in a county where they make up 32 percent of the student population-
