ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

668 Words3 Pages

Do you like having to wait? Nobody does. The government is trying to get rid of net neutrality, which is when the Internet companies have to be neutral and not charge you more for visiting certain sites over others. Also, net neutrality allows you to access them at the same speed. Removing net neutrality will force you to wait on sites you love. Today, I am going to discuss net neutrality, how removing it could negatively affect everyone, and how we should make sure the government keeps net neutrality.

Net neutrality is necessary and will affect us if we don’t have it. According to ACLU, a nonprofit dedicated to preserving our rights, no net neutrality could affect gamers and other online users. Net neutrality is where all networks treat all sites the same, and they all work at the same pace. The site states that “Without …show more content…

The ACLU says, “Without Net Neutrality, network providers could charge you more to download your favorite videos or music, or to use services such as Rhapsody, YouTube, Napster, and iTunes. Network providers can also tell you which download service you have to use, charging you a toll if you decide to use one of their competitors”(ACLU). This information is important if you are trying to update your computer or other device. Also, this is detrimental for phones while downloading apps, because if the apps take too long to download or load, then you can’t get on that site. At HowStuffWorks, it says that “The Internet, as it exists today, is an open forum for free speech and freedom of expression. Websites publishing both popular and unpopular viewpoints are treated equally in terms of how their data gets from servers to screens”(Roos). This information is important because if we don’t have net neutrality, then nobody will have freedom of speech. Without net neutrality, most people will have to pay to give their

Show More
Related
1022 Words | 5 Pages

Though they both can agree that the internet creates a loss, they see it as two different losses, in which Carr’s argument complicates

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

The Patriot Act is one of today’s most controversial laws. The law’s official name is the USA PATRIOT Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. The law was passed in 2001 after the September Eleventh terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. The act greatly increased the power of the government in preventing terrorism, but it also increased the amount of surveillance that the government performs on citizens.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

As Carr asserts, the internet has begun to negatively affect how people think, from distractions in online articles, to creating negative shortcomings upon users’

Read More
1197 Words | 5 Pages

The National Security Agency also known as the NSA, it's an intelligent organization of the United States government who monitors foreign countries and collects information of people. The NSA is economically beneficial towards the government of the United States some reasons consist of the prevention of dangerous terrorist attacks, funding's in the government, and the prevention of hackers taking over the system. Though at the same time the NSA should be stopped because they have invaded the privacy of many people without their consents. Currently, the United States has been facing terrorist attack, which has caused many deaths and tragedies not only to the United States but as well towards the world.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

The Patriot Act is unsafe, unconstitutional and should be banned from the United States of America. According to source, three president Bush created the Patriot Act in 2001. He signed off on the act after the tragedy of nine eleven to try and monitor terrorists in the United States. Although the act was created to try and keep the country safe, it also has caused several set backs. There are sources that oppose and support the Patriot Act; moreover, the act violates the individual privacy of citizens, can falsely charge innocent people, but can stop terrorism.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

On September 11th, 2001 two planes horrifically struck the world trade center killing 2977 Americans. The President, Senate, and House of Representatives enacted the Patriot Act in response to this horrendous act of terrorism. This act allows the United States Government to track suspected terrorists' phone calls, purchases, and suspicious activities. The act has provided new ways to fraught the plans of terrorists before they can come into action. Since the passing of the Patriot Act, the NSA has been able to stop major attacks before they even happen.

Read More
2024 Words | 9 Pages

“The Internet, an immeasurably powerful computing system, is subsuming most of our other intellectual technologies. It’s becoming our map and our clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and TV” (Car). Still the internet isn’t becoming everything. The internet doesn’t give us access to print out our clothing or our food and beverages. We physically have to go out and get it ourselves, or order these online through the Internet.

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

Shant Sahakian, in the informative and opinionated piece, “Repeal of Net Neutrality is bad for Education, Business, and You,” written in Los Angeles Times, on November 30, 2017, argues that repealing, therefore ending net neutrality would be detrimental and “the end of the internet we have always known and loved”, and that ending net neutrality will be bad for education, business, and anyone who believes that the internet should be free and equal to use by all persons who use it today. Sahakian’s evidence consists of various references and indications to the fact that ending net neutrality will be the end to internet freedom and equality as wells as an end to the fairness and equal opportunity that net neutrality gives us today. Sahakian also

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

Net neutrality is one thing that citizens and businesses of many countries are supporting to help keep the internet free for everyone. There are many reasons why I am in support of net neutrality. The first is that I do not think that corporations have the right to throttle content. Another reason is that freedom of speech could be at risk if net neutrality were not enforced (1). Finally, the arguments against net neutrality are weak.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

The internet is a big part of our lives. It can change our lives and ruin them at the same time, that’s why you have to be careful. Many students are using it for school and parents use it for work. Internet access can change your life by giving you a chance to learn new things and explore and view different things that you’ve never heard or seen before. The internet

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

There is a chance that internet providers will realize that if they charge for everything that they will lose customers and therefore profits. If providers realize this then only the unnecessary sites will be blocked and the informational and useful sites will remain unblocked. With the option to make a few more dollars the providers may not take that option though. In the Verizon vs FCC court case ruled that the FCC didn’t have authority to only allow a certain part of the internet to common carriers. If the FCC wants to restrict what they can give providers, then providers will try to sell everything they can to as many people which means one bill for all internet access.

Read More
2033 Words | 9 Pages

Since its inception the internet has stood by a simple rule, all data is equal. Through the implementation of legislation and policies this simple rule may however be changed so that certain data may be prioritized. This would exclusively benefit telecommunications corporations while diminishing the ability of the general user. Total net

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

No Net Neutrality: If there is no net neutrality, Internet service providers will have power to create their own internet traffic, so that they can extract more benefit from it. For example the service providers can charge more for companies for the services like YouTube, because it consumes more bandwidth comparing to normal websites. As we know without Net Neutrality internet will not exist, instead of free access to the websites the service providers will charge more for the customers.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

The day after it launched, again, its net traffic was up by 45% (most of them being curious newcomers) and it eventually helped to boost the website’s growth and popularity. What did governments gain by this stunt? Nothing worthwhile, I

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

Related Topics

Open Document