The Pros And Cons Of Non-Traditional Families

1743 Words7 Pages

As our society develops so does the typical family, now instead of the nuclear family model being the norm a more diverse make up is coming the surface. Instead of a mother and father many families only have one parent present, or have two same sexed parents. This change has caused a lot of speculations about how the family composition can affect the outcome of the children. This idea of the nuclear family model being the norm is long gone according to ABC News. Saying that only 25% of families fall along the lines of a traditional family with fathers being the bread winners and moms staying home. There is a steady decline according the popular press source, in the 1950’s the nuclear family applied to 60% of American households. The article “New ‘Non-Traditional’ American Families” Encourages people to accept blended families moving forward because its becoming the new norm. The article goes in depth talking about how to approach and accept families different from your own. It also highlight that although the nuclear family model isn’t …show more content…

This is due to the divorce rate increasing, one NY times blog reports. Fathers being left to raise children on their own is usually due to divorce and it has become very common across the untied states. The blog claimed that 30% of families were run by single parents. The blog also stated that single dads make more than single mothers which cane be correlated to the persistent wage gap. Even though fathers have to take time off for their children they still are able to make more. With that in mind children raised only by their fathers face the same issues as children just raised by mothers According to the author Belkin. The children of these families tend to have lower economic standing, drop out of school earlier, an aren’t as satisfied with their overall life. (Belkin